Bug#558426: atl1e performance problems with native IPv6

On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 02:29 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 21:08 +0100, Joerg Pareigis wrote: > > Package: linux-image-2.6-686 > > Version: 2.6.26-19lenny2 > > Module: atl1e > > > > IPv4 traffic runs perfect with 100Mbit/s. > > Receiving data with IPv6 is also OK. > > But sen

Bug#558426: atl1e performance problems with native IPv6

On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 21:08 +0100, Joerg Pareigis wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6-686 > Version: 2.6.26-19lenny2 > Module: atl1e > > IPv4 traffic runs perfect with 100Mbit/s. > Receiving data with IPv6 is also OK. > But sending data is horrible like a 9600 modem line. > tcpdump on the receiving

Bug#558721: Please update sfc driver from 2.6.33/net-next-2.6

Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist As part of my day job, I've submitted an update to the sfc driver which has been accepted into net-next-2.6 for inclusion in Linux 2.6.33. I believe this should be included in squeeze because it adds new hardware support. Since squeeze is intended to use 2.6

Processed: tagging 504391

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 504391 + pending Bug #504391 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] Please enable CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Processed: retitle 504391 to Make CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME a run-time option, tagging 504391

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > retitle 504391 Make CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME a run-time option Bug #504391 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] Please enable CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME Changed Bug title to 'Make CO

Processed: tagging 558011

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 558011 + pending Bug #558011 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: several missing modules Bug #557996 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: Missing ath5k dr

Processed: tagging 558023

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 558023 + pending Bug #558023 [firmware-linux-nonfree] firmware-linux-nonfree: please, include radeon/RV635_pfp.bin firmware Added tag(s) pending. > End of message,

Re: Linux image packages going to depend on python

Hi, On Sun, Nov 29 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > Find attached an initial attempt to use shell only. Let me know if you > are interested. > > The script is configurable, so a sysadmin can decide to re-rewrite fstab > using DM/LVM names rather than UUID, or volume LABEL, or legacy /dev/hd* > names

Re: Linux image packages going to depend on python

On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 13:56 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 28, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > The Linux image packages needs to do some modifications to core > > configuration files like fstab in the future to allow newer kernels to > > work. To do this and the planned further extension I intend

Bug#558612: linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: ..modprobe -v em28xx succeds, but fails to create /dev/video0 on at least 686 and amd64, upstream bug?

Package: linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64 Version: 2.6.32-rc8 Severity: normal ...celcius is a Fujitsu Celsius H240 w T7200 cpu on linux-image-2.6.32-rc8-amd64: celsius:~# modprobe -v em28xx ;ll /dev/video* ;dmesg |tail insmod /lib/modules/2.6.32-rc8-amd64/kernel/drivers/media/video/tveeprom.ko insm

[fwd] RFC: organising focused BSPs

Hey, [sorry for the cross-post. please don't reply to all lists] I've sent the attached mail to debian-qa, and would be interested to have the opinion of maintainers of other big (sets of) packages. Cheers, Julien --- Begin Message --- Hi, First a bit of background: I spent yesterday going thr

Re: Linux image packages going to depend on python

On Nov 28, Bastian Blank wrote: > The Linux image packages needs to do some modifications to core > configuration files like fstab in the future to allow newer kernels to > work. To do this and the planned further extension I intend to make all > linux image packages depend on python. This is not