Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 511419 linux-2.6
Bug #511419 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] Please apply
upstream patch for unbreaking /proc//pagemap on 32bit systems
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.26-1-686' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No l
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Upstream bug became a mess of different reports and was closed
> UNREPRODUCIBLE, so not actually fixed
> tags 486346 - fixed
Bug #486346 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: lid switch hangs and resets
laptop
Ignoring request to alter tags
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Upstream bug became a mess of different reports and was closed
> UNREPRODUCIBLE, so not actually fixed
> tags 486346 - fixed-upstream
Bug #486346 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: lid switch hangs and resets
laptop
Removed tag(s) fixed-u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 538372 + pending
Bug #538372 [linux-libc-dev] header failure including netlink.h (or uio.h)
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 511419 2.6.28-1
Bug #511419 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] Please apply
upstream patch for unbreaking /proc//pagemap on 32bit systems
There is no source info for the package 'linux-image-2.6.26-1-686' at version
'2.6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 511419 + pending
Bug #511419 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] Please apply
upstream patch for unbreaking /proc//pagemap on 32bit systems
Added
I've posted the details to linux-scsi in case this is known or being worked
on.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 508649 + pending
Bug #508649 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64] Please cherry pick fixes for V4L
ioctl_compat32
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fixed upstream in 2.6.28
> fixed 508649 2.6.28-1
Bug #508649 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64] Please cherry pick fixes for V4L
ioctl_compat32
There is no source info for the package 'linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64' at version
'2.6.28-1' with architect
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 508599 + pending
Bug #508599 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Increase
power_up delay to fix TI readers
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 508599 2.6.30-1
Bug #508599 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-686] linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Increase
power_up delay to fix TI readers
There is no source info for the package 'linux-image-2.6.26-1-686' at version
'2.6.30-1' with architecture ''
Unable
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 23:18 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr [2009-03-07 22:59]:
> > I'm not sure we want to fix this for 2.6.26 in lenny since the
> > second patch is quite large. (I considered putting these two patches
> > into the kernel independently of your email but decide
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 19:23 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 01:05:12PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:35:06PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
> > > Version: 2.6.26-11
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Tags:
Your message dated Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:43:04 +0100
with message-id <1255056184.2519.56.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: linux-kernel-headers: please revert addition of typedef
for __kernel_dev_t in linux/types.h
has caused the Debian Bug report #415095,
regarding linux-kernel-headers: please
Unfortunately, the patch doesn't solve this problem, at least not by itself.
Are there any other options besides bisecting 2.6.30 to 2.6.31? I don't mind
doing a bisect, but it's likely to take more time than I have available in the
near future.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ.
dann frazier wrote:
> hmm.. wonder if this would help:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9d2e9d66a3f032667934144cd61c396ba49f090d
>
> Would you be able to test that?
I'll test it against 2.6.31.3 in the next few days.
Maybe it will also app
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:54:49 -0600
dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 08:17:30PM +1100, Jason White wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > After upgrading to 2.6.31 from 2.6.30, I get the following, quite
> > frequently, in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 522828 + pending
Bug #522828 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.29-1-686: ath5k resume regression with
AR2413
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #522828 to the same tag
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #526406 (http://bugs.debian.org/526406)
# * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian
FYI: The status of the linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.30-1
Current version: 2.6.30-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the linux-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.30-6
Current version: 2.6.30-8
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rec
FYI: The status of the linux-latest-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20
Current version: 21
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the linux-modules-extra-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.30-3
Current version: 2.6.30-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a da
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:12:58PM +0200, Philipp Hübner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this bug is definitely present in up2date Lenny.
There are optional, more up to date kvm modules in lenny.
Are you using those? Does the problem go away if you do?
This sequence of commands should build/install them for yo
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 08:17:30PM +1100, Jason White wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> After upgrading to 2.6.31 from 2.6.30, I get the following, quite frequently,
> in my log.
>
> Oct 8 19:15:03 jdc kernel: [34919.532016] sd 6:1:0:0: stra
Your message dated Thu, 8 Oct 2009 09:58:26 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id
<2136181987.7791181255010306649.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com>
and subject line linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390 will not boot!
has caused the Debian Bug report #523942,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390 will not boot!
to be m
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 14:42 +0200, Paolo Sala wrote:
> Hi Ben, why you say that the hd is failing? Smartctl doesn't agree with you:
> > proDFS:~# smartctl -H /dev/hda
> > smartctl version 5.38 [i686-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen
> > Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
Hi Ben, why you say that the hd is failing? Smartctl doesn't agree with you:
> proDFS:~# smartctl -H /dev/hda
> smartctl version 5.38 [i686-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen
> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
>
> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
> SMART overal
By way of follow-up, I think I should be able to use netconsole to obtain
(non-visual) access to the kernel oops which this bug causes.
I should have time before the end of the year to work on it by upgrading to
kernel 2.6.31 and conducting some tests. this machine is not my current laptop
anymore
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
After upgrading to 2.6.31 from 2.6.30, I get the following, quite frequently,
in my log.
Oct 8 19:15:03 jdc kernel: [34919.532016] sd 6:1:0:0: strange observation,
the
queue depth is (64) meanwhile fw queue depth (65)
Oct 8 1
31 matches
Mail list logo
