Bug#545231: reportbug on linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64

2009-09-05 Thread Martin Millnert
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.30-6 Severity: normal I have also made a video recording of the console log while the kernel boots. Don't know if that can be useful to you. It does provide more information than the below kernel log, though the format of said information isn't op

Processed: merging 545231 545232

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 545231 545232 Bug#545231: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: 18 minutes wait until X is ready to launch, instead of normal ~45 sec Bug#545232: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: 18 minutes wait until X is ready to launch, instead of normal ~45 sec Merge

Bug#545231: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: 18 minutes wait until X is ready to launch, instead of normal ~45 sec

2009-09-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 22:57 +0200, Martin Millnert wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 > Version: 2.6.30-6 > Severity: important > > > When booting linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 my system takes some 18 minutes to > boot > through up until X is ready to launch. > Normal for my system, for

Bug#539406: linux-image-2.6.30-1-alpha-smp: fails to load fw for 1st scsi adapter

2009-09-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
If the issue is really that your system is so much slow that it is unable to load the firmware before the 60 seconds timeout expires, and I highly doubt it, then just set /sys/class/firmware/timeout to a much higher value (just do it at the top of /lib/udev/firmware.agent and then rebuild the initr

Processed: tagging 544194, severity of 544194 is normal

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 544194 unreproducible Bug #544194 [linux-2.6] linux-source-2.6: compiles kernel but fails to make .deb package Added tag(s) unreproducible. > severity 544194 normal Bug #544194 [linux-2.6] linux-source-2.6: compiles kernel but fails to make

Bug#545232: Acknowledgement (linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: 18 minutes wait until X is ready to launch, instead of normal ~45 sec)

2009-09-05 Thread Martin Millnert
Hi, sincere apologies for this duplicated report of #545231. Unfortunate user error. Please handle as appropriate. Regards, -- Martin Millnert signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#545232: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: 18 minutes wait until X is ready to launch, instead of normal ~45 sec

2009-09-05 Thread Martin Millnert
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.30-6 Severity: important When booting linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 my system takes some 18 minutes to boot through up until X is ready to launch. Normal for my system, for example on my current kernel linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64, is some ~45 sec. I

Processed: severity of 545229 is important

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 545229 important Bug #545229 [linux-image-2.6.30-1-parisc] linux-image-2.6.30-1-parisc: panic on boot Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. De

Bug#545231: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64: 18 minutes wait until X is ready to launch, instead of normal ~45 sec

2009-09-05 Thread Martin Millnert
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.30-6 Severity: important When booting linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 my system takes some 18 minutes to boot through up until X is ready to launch. Normal for my system, for example on my current kernel linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64, is some ~45 sec. I

Bug#545229: linux-image-2.6.30-1-parisc: panic on boot

2009-09-05 Thread James Bottomley
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-parisc Version: 2.6.30-6 Severity: critical Tags: patch Justification: breaks the whole system -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: hppa (par

Bug#544194: linux-source-2.6: compiles kernel but fails to make .deb package

2009-09-05 Thread Flavio M Matsumoto
Ben Hutchings escreveu: > It works for me, though I have to run "umask 022" first due to a > separate bug in the deb-pkg rule. Even after typing "umask 022", "make deb-pkg" still refuses to work in the fakeroot environment. Things has changed however, now under root ownership (using either su or

Bug#544592: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: sometimes failed to boot)

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:38:24 +0100 with message-id <1252179504.3494.9.ca...@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#544592: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: sometimes failed to boot has caused the Debian Bug report #544592, regarding linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: sometimes failed to boot to be ma

Processed: notfound 544592 in 2.6.30-6

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 544592 2.6.30-6 Bug #544592 [linux-image-2.6.30-1-686] linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: sometimes failed to boot Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.30-6. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#544592: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: sometimes failed to boot

2009-09-05 Thread Davide Prina
Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 22:17 +0200, Davide Prina wrote: Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:44 +0200, Davide Prina wrote: sometimes the boot fail: after grub I see: "Loading, please wait ...", but the hard disk is not used. After a while busybox appear; here I c

Bug#510695: marked as done (type in included config file for cman initscript)

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#510695: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #510695, regarding type in included config file for cman initscript to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#528258: marked as done (please package 3.0.0.rc2)

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#528258: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #528258, regarding please package 3.0.0.rc2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#471398: marked as done (ccs: /etc/cluster/cluster.conf: file not found (broken on clean install))

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#471398: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #471398, regarding ccs: /etc/cluster/cluster.conf: file not found (broken on clean install) to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#487953: marked as done (fails to install)

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#471398: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #471398, regarding fails to install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#528419: marked as done (should recommend or at least suggest python-openssl)

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#528419: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #528419, regarding should recommend or at least suggest python-openssl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#528420: marked as done (/usr/share/fence/telnet_ssl not executable)

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:58:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#528420: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #528420, regarding /usr/share/fence/telnet_ssl not executable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#545064: initramfs-tools: "update-initramfs" fails to include "/lib/libc.so.6" and "/lib/libm.so"

2009-09-05 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:11:10PM +0200, Christoph Franzen wrote: > > Whenever a new RAM disk is created (for instance with "update-initramfs -u -k > all"), the above mentioned "libc" files are missing in the image. If I use > the package > "busybox", the kernel will panic because "libm.so" is n

Bug#545112: DV capture over firewire works for only a few seconds

2009-09-05 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 05:05:21AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 > Version: 2.6.30-6 > Severity: important > > I've been trying to capture some DV from tape using this kernel > version, and failing to get more than a few seconds. dvgrab keeps > running but stop

Processed: severity of 545064 is important

2009-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # at most > severity 545064 important Bug #545064 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: "update-initramfs" fails to include "/lib/libc.so.6" and "/lib/libm.so" Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 545064 to the same value. > End of message, st

Bug#540831: blacklisting pcspkr ruins beep(1), and icewm' mail beep

2009-09-05 Thread jidanni
> "JT" == Josh Triplett writes: Indeed, after doing # modprobe snd-pcsp #enables beep(1) # alsamixer -c 2 #first time I ever tried -c And changing Simple mixer control 'PC Speaker',0 Mono: Playback [on] to [off], beep stopped beeping. So I apparently have the organs, but I would rather reta

Bug#541169: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 : sis190 driver doesn't work with Ethernet Adpator

2009-09-05 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Hello, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 06:27:19AM +0200, Pierre Meurisse wrote: >> >> My Ethernet device is unusable with amd64 kernels (2.6.26 ... 2.6.30). >> When connected to a dhcp server, the system gets a IP address, but >> no connection is possible > > You might hav

Bug#540831: blacklisting pcspkr ruins beep(1), and icewm' mail beep

2009-09-05 Thread Josh Triplett
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 05:13:42AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > | jidanni, a few questions about your lack of a console beep: > Yes must insert modules to get beep(1) to work. > diff(1) shows amixer output is not affected by module insertion. > Left most control in alsamixer affects mplayer,