On Friday 10 July 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> Maybe the -fwrapv change?
Bingo. Makes a lot of sense too for an issue related to gcc version.
Reverting only that patch on top of -17 results in good boot too.
Gah! And it's even a known issue:
- http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13012
- ht
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686
Version: http weirdness
Severity: normal
cat /tmp/reportbug-linux-image-20090710-10929-GjawKA
Subject: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686: packet loss in http traffic
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2
Severity: normal
I'm seeing lots of wha
Hi Ben,
* Ben Hutchings [090710 11:56]:
>
> The MAC change operation seems to have been accidentally left out of
> this driver in a change to the way net device operations are set up.
>
> Please try applying the following patch:
>
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:13:53 +0100
with message-id <1247199233.21924.139.ca...@deadeye>
and subject line Re: linux-source-2.6.26: CIFS Buffer Overflow as Reported on
Full Disclosure
has caused the Debian Bug report #523365,
regarding linux-source-2.6.26: CIFS Buffer Overflow as Re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 532376
Bug#532376: r8169: network buffer overflow
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ben Hutchings
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
alloc_etherdev() used to install default implementations of these
operations, but they must now be explicitly installed in struct
net_device_ops.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
Stephen Hemminger caught most of these omissions. I think this covers
the rest.
This is applicable to 2.6.30 with sm
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 11:01 +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.30
> Version: 2.6.30-1
> Severity: normal
>
> After upgrading my kernel from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 I am unable to set the
> MAC address of my Prism 2.5 pci wireless NIC using the orinoco-pci
> driver. My interfaces file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # upstream fixed in 2.6.30
> fixed 532376 2.6.30-1
Bug#532376: r8169: network buffer overflow
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.30-1.
> # upstream reported as present since 2.6.10
> found 532376 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch2
Bug#532376: r8169: network b
Package: linux-source-2.6.30
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: normal
After upgrading my kernel from 2.6.29 to 2.6.30 I am unable to set the
MAC address of my Prism 2.5 pci wireless NIC using the orinoco-pci
driver. My interfaces file has a section like:
iface eth1-foo inet dhcp
wireless_key s:fo
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:32:45AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> > I'd suggest the CVE-2009-0029 fixes. Lots of arch-specific stuff in
> > there.
>
> Nope. Other suggestions welcome. I'll nail it down tomorrow.
Maybe the -fwrapv change?
--
dann frazie
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 23:46 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Here's what I currently know for certain:
> > * 2.6.26-13 built with gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-24) boots [2]
> > * 2.6.26-17 built with gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-25) panics
> > * 2.6.26-17 built with gcc-4.2 (4.2.4-6) b
On Thursday 09 July 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> I'd suggest the CVE-2009-0029 fixes. Lots of arch-specific stuff in
> there.
Nope. Other suggestions welcome. I'll nail it down tomorrow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:46:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Here's what I currently know for certain:
> > * 2.6.26-13 built with gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-24) boots [2]
> > * 2.6.26-17 built with gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-25) panics
> > * 2.6.26-17 built with gcc-4.2 (4.2.
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:50 +0100, Ben Whyte wrote:
> Package: linux-libc-dev
> Version: 2.6.30-1
Not this version.
> Severity: normal
>
>
>
> Preparing to replace linux-libc-dev 2.6.30-1 (using
> .../linux-libc-dev_2.6.31~rc2-1~experimental.1~snapshot.13905_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 536413 2.6.30-1
Bug#536413: linux-libc-dev: fails on upgrade
Bug no longer marked as found in version 2.6.30-1.
> found 536413 2.6.31~rc2-1~experimental.1~snapshot.13905
Bug#536413: linux-libc-dev: fails on upgrade
Bug marked as found in
On Thursday 09 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Here's what I currently know for certain:
> * 2.6.26-13 built with gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-24) boots [2]
> * 2.6.26-17 built with gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-25) panics
> * 2.6.26-17 built with gcc-4.2 (4.2.4-6) boots
Bisect... - the following all built with gcc-4.1 (4.1.2-
Latest upgrade of the kernel seems to have fixed the problem.
Thanks,
--
Nicolas DEGAND
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> reassign 536426 linux-2.6
Bug#536426: linux-image: CIFS in 2.6.30 may get EEXIST on temp file create
causing file creation flood
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
B
On Thursday 09 July 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:05:15AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Here's a simple rebuild from zelenka's lenny chroot:
> http://people.debian.org/~dannf/bugs/536354/
Thanks Dann. That paniced too.
After that I've managed after all to build a 4.1 cro
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: normal
Preparing to replace linux-libc-dev 2.6.30-1 (using
.../linux-libc-dev_2.6.31~rc2-1~experimental.1~snapshot.13905_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement linux-libc-dev ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-libc-dev_2.6.
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:09:50 +0200
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:55:59PM +0200, Manuel Tobias Schiller
> wrote:
> > after much delay (I'm sorry, I'm drowning in work) and a new batch
> > of ram chips (which greatly improved the stability of the machine in
> > question) I m
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:05:15AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 03:03:51PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > A user reported on d-s390 [1] that a Lenny installation on s390 failed
> > > with a kernel panic during boot. I could reproduce the panic on my
> > > Hercules system usin
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:55:59PM +0200, Manuel Tobias Schiller wrote:
> after much delay (I'm sorry, I'm drowning in work) and a new batch of
> ram chips (which greatly improved the stability of the machine in
> question) I managed to install the new 2.6.30 kernel from backports on
> the machine,
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:59:33 +0200
with message-id <20090709165933.ga16...@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: can't seem to reproduce this
has caused the Debian Bug report #445849,
regarding linux-2.6: NULL pointer exception after mounting a filesystem with a
SELinux contex
On Thursday 09 July 2009, dann frazier wrote:
> The buildd log shows that 2.6.26-17 was built w/ gcc-4.1_4.1.2-25. Is
> there a cross-compiler available w/ that version?
Unfortunately not that I know of. Packages currently available on emdebian
are incomplete.
And I've had very mixed results try
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 03:03:51PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > A user reported on d-s390 [1] that a Lenny installation on s390 failed
> > with a kernel panic during boot. I could reproduce the panic on my
> > Hercules system using the installer.
>
> Hmmm. This is fun. If I cross-compile the kernel
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > A user reported on d-s390 [1] that a Lenny installation on s390
> > > failed with a kernel panic during boot. I could reproduce the panic
> > > on my Hercules system using the installer.
>
On Thursday 09 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > A user reported on d-s390 [1] that a Lenny installation on s390
> > failed with a kernel panic during boot. I could reproduce the panic
> > on my Hercules system using the installer.
>
> Hmmm. This is fun. If I cross-compile the kernel myself it boots
> A user reported on d-s390 [1] that a Lenny installation on s390 failed
> with a kernel panic during boot. I could reproduce the panic on my
> Hercules system using the installer.
Hmmm. This is fun. If I cross-compile the kernel myself it boots fine.
I used my own cross-build system for this, no
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-17
Severity: important
A user reported on d-s390 [1] that a Lenny installation on s390 failed
with a kernel panic during boot. I could reproduce the panic on my
Hercules system using the installer.
I then installed the current Lenny kernel on my installed Hercul
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.30-1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.30-1) (wa...@debian.org) (gcc
version 4.3.3 (Debian 4.3.3-10) ) #1 SMP Sun Jun 14 15:00:29 UTC 2009
** Command line:
root=UUID=ac871eeb-c7ba-444
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: normal
As my plain old NVidia graphics card operates its fan normally at full fan
speed, I use a small script to set fanspeed temperature dependent via 'nvclock
-f -F' once per minute. When using kernel 2.6.30-1-amd64, every script
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 536333 linux-2.6
Bug#536333: kernel-package: do_initrd is undocumented
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 536333 linux-2.6
Bug#536333: kernel-package: do_initrd is undocumented
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.30-2
Severity: important
Hi,
2.6.30-2 crashes when used as a Xen domU kernel. 2.6.30-1 worked fine. Here
is what I get in "xm dmesg" output:
(XEN) traps.c:413:d70 Unhandled general protection fault fault/trap [#13] on
VCPU 0 [ec=]
(XEN) doma
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 536324 linux-2.6
Bug#536324: [linux-image-2.6.30-1] hard disk numbering is partially changed
from IDE to SATA
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.30-1'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.30-1' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stoppi
36 matches
Mail list logo
