Re: Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Bastian Blank wrote: > This means that Debian will get uninstallable on the following CPUs: > - Intel i486, There is new hardware sold today that is (only) compatible to the 486 SX instruction set. But it runs at 300 MHz. So it would be a pity to loose support for such hardwar

Re: Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:18:39PM -0600, dann frazier a écrit : > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux > > kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose > > a change of

Bug#526406: bugzilla update

2009-05-24 Thread Alex Samad
Hi seems like there is a bugzilla for this now http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13375 Alex signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-24 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Bastian, On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux > kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose > a change of the default machine type setting used by the compile

Bug#514418: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...

2009-05-24 Thread David Miller
From: Julien Cristau Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:52:20 +0200 > I plan to revert it for lenny r2, and if time permits I'll try to > make the xserver-xorg package generate an xorg.conf with Driver set > to fbdev instead.. Indeed, that's likely to work much better. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Re: Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-24 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2009-05-24, Bastian Blank wrote: > I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux > kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose > a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler. IMHO you got to explain why you want to mak

Re: Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-24 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Bastian Blank may or may not have written... > I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux > kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose a > change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler. WRT squeeze, pre- or

Re: Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:18:39PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: >On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> Hi folks >> >> I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux >> kernels in the i386 port to

Bug#530426: fglrx-modules-2.6.26-2-686: Module is older than fglrx-driver in testing

2009-05-24 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
Package: fglrx-modules-2.6.26-2-686 Version: 2.6.26+8-12-2+lenny1 Severity: grave File: /lib/modules/2.6.26-2-686/nonfree/fglrx/fglrx.ko I've got both fglrx-modules-2.6.26-2-686 and fglrx-driver (1:9-2-2) from testing. From the X11 log: (II) fglrx(0): Kernel Module Version Information: (II) fgl

Re: Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-24 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux > kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose > a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler. > >

Raising minimum CPU requirement for i386 kernel

2009-05-24 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the shipped Linux kernels in the i386 port to i686 (with cmov). For now I will not propose a change of the default machine type setting used by the compiler. This means that Debian will get uninstallable on the following CPUs: - Intel

Raising minimum CPU requirement for s390 kernel/port

2009-05-24 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks I would like to raise the minimum CPU requirement for the s390 port to z900. At the same time the 31-bit kernel (-s390) will be retired because it lacks upstream maintenance. This means that Debian will get unusable on the old 31-bit-only CPUs (G5 and G6), as used for example in the Mult

Bug#530402: marked as done (linux-2.6: please enable raw1394 in kernel configuration)

2009-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 May 2009 19:15:15 +0100 with message-id <1243188915.16597.93.ca...@deadeye> and subject line Re: Bug#530402: linux-2.6: please enable raw1394 in kernel configuration has caused the Debian Bug report #530402, regarding linux-2.6: please enable raw1394 in kernel configura

Bug#530402: linux-2.6: please enable raw1394 in kernel configuration

2009-05-24 Thread Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist ffado is part of debian now, and it needs the raw1394 driver which is not enabled in the packaged kernel. I'm aware that this is incompatible with the new 1394 stack, so it's probably not feasible to close this wishlist item until raw1394 (or equivalent)

Ga. Mgother Seeks Harry Potter Ban

2009-05-24 Thread Haroutunian
<>

Re: Proposed changes to linux-2.6

2009-05-24 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 22:57 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 04:41:16PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:32:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > I intend to do the following changes to linux-2.6: > > > * Change i386/686(-bigmem) to include generic op

Bug#514418: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...

2009-05-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 13:41:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 12:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 01:21 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > No, I would have said that if time is tight at least we can use > > > "fbdev" as the Xorg driver for PCI devices

Bug#530376: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: concurrent MD devices recovery => message flood in dmesg

2009-05-24 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-13 Severity: normal Starting situation (all RAID arrays are Linux Software RAID, from the CONFIG_MD driver): /dev/md1, a (degraded) raid5 array made of /dev/sdb6 /dev/sdc6 /dev/md0, a (degraded) raid1 array made of /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdc5 The sit

Bug#529870: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: I can confirm the bug also exists in 2.6.26-2-686

2009-05-24 Thread Hasse Hagen Johansen
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686 Followup-For: Bug #529870 After upgrade to 2.6.26-2-686 the kernel panics when selinux is enabled -- Package-specific info: -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2

Re: Proposed changes to linux-2.6

2009-05-24 Thread Jens Peter Secher
2009/5/23 Bastian Blank : > > Some of this changes affects D-I. > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:32:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> I intend to do the following changes to linux-2.6: >> * Remove i386/486. Some VIA mini-ITX boards only work with the i486 flavor, last I checked. I have such one in