Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 524125 important
Bug#524125: apt-get installing virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64 makes my
internet stop working!
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> reassign 524125 virtualbox-ose-source
Bug#524125: apt-get installing virtua
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686
Version: 2.6.29-2
Severity: normal
When passing the port option to mount.cifs (so that I may redirect my
mount to use the SSH tunnel for example), it is ignored. The option is
properly parsed, but it has no effect what so ever in the code. See the
following for m
This bug is fixed on my system with linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64 (currently in
unstable)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-15
Severity: normal
Kernel 2.6.26-2-686 does not recognize the Atheros AR2425 wifi card in
my EeePC 904HA. dmesg shows no indication of any wifi capabilities.
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
APT prefers s
Package: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Whenever I install virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-2-amd64 and then reboot my
computer, network-manager-gnome says "Wired Network Connection with a
self-assigned address" when I hover the cursor
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
to po
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 520882 fglrx-source
Bug#520882: fglrx-modules-2.6.26-1-686: Prevents shutting down gdm & uswsusp
Bug reassigned from package `fglrx-modules-2.6.26-1-686' to `fglrx-source'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:21:41 +0200
with message-id <49e4e245.80...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: fglrx-modules-2.6-686: X driver is newer than kernel module
has caused the Debian Bug report #523025,
regarding fglrx-modules-2.6-686: X driver is newer than kernel module
to be mark
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.29-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.29-2.dsc
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.29-2.tar.gz
atl2-modules-2.6.29-1-486_2.6.29+2.0.5-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-2_i386.deb
aufs-modules-2.6.29-
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> thanks; i'll check tonight.
are both working like a charm, uploading..
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> tags 514611 + pending
Bug#514611: [linux-modules-extra-2.6] Please add batman-adv modules
Tags were: moreinfo patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping proces
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> tags 521535 + pending
Bug#521535: [PATCH] [linux-modules-extra-2.6] Please add batmand-gateway modules
Tags were: moreinfo patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, st
I have found an environmental difference between the two servers, one of which
runs linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390x (and will boot)
and the other of which runs linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390 (and will not boot). The
s390x server has only one virtual CPU.
The s390 server has two virtual CPUs. I changed th
By the way, I have another server that runs the 64-bit version of the kernel
image (linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390x), and it works fine.
Either the bug affects only the 31-bit version of the kernel, or there is an
environmental difference of some kind.
I just tried re-building the initial RAM file system for the 2.6.26-1-s390
kernel image, rerunning zipl, and rebooting.
It came up fine. It does not appear to be a problem with the build process for
the initial RAM file system.
If it is, it is a build problem which is specific to the new kernel
> Can you boot the old kernel and unpack the initramfs to see if the
> needed modules got added? See the DEBUG section of initramfs-tools(8)
> for a command to do the unpacking.
As you know, the initial RAM file system is not included with the kernel
image package but is built dynamically during k
On Saturday 11 April 2009 17:58:15 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> A new version (0.3.1-3) was uploaded, but it is currently in new queue
> due to a new -dbg package. I will send an extra notice when it entered
> sid.
batmand-0.3.1-3 is now in sid and should fix the problem you mentioned. I hope
it is now
Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> batmand-0.3.1-3 is now in sid and should fix the problem you mentioned. I
> hope
> it is now suitable to be build by linux-modules-extra-2.6.
thanks; i'll check tonight.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum.
Package: et131x-modules-2.6.26-1-amd64
Severity: important
installed the amd64-version of this package on 2 different amd-systems with
debian-lenny installed.
I can see incoming and outgoing packages via tcpdump but the outgoing packages
doesn't reach the network.
I changed one system to 686-ker
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 524012 et131x-source
Bug#524012: et131x-modules-2.6.26-1-amd64: no outgoing network packages on
et131x-interface
Bug reassigned from package `et131x-modules-2.6.26-1-amd64' to `et131x-source'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
20 matches
Mail list logo
