Bug#497185: Third party confirmation

2008-10-21 Thread Sean Kellogg
I can confirm this same behavior with 2.6.26-9. And it's not just headphones, in my case it is the digital audio out into my sound system and is confirmed in all audio applications. My information is pretty much the same as the origional poster except the PCI device in question: 00:10.1 Audio d

Bug#494009: No loss without microcode

2008-10-21 Thread Alexandre Oliva
I thought I'd point out that the cleaned-up drivers available in linux-libre work just fine on my home server that has an ATI video card. I don't know whether its absence causes any functionality degradation (my video card requirements are pretty low), but it certainly doesn't affect stability. I

Bug#494308: Living without e100 firmware

2008-10-21 Thread Alexandre Oliva
I thought it might be useful to point out that the removal of the non-Free firmware present in the e100 driver doesn't have any effect on the (old) notebook I have that uses the e100 driver. Initially, when I first converted it to linux-libre, that didn't include that driver at all, enabling the e

A Move to 2.6.27

2008-10-21 Thread Peter Besenbruch
Hello all, I want to thank you all for your work on the 2.6.26 kernel, which has gone from unusable on the EEEPC to usable on some, and better than the 2.6.24 kernel when it is. I was wondering if the Debian kernel team might consider a move to 2.6.27, as it looks like Lenny's release is going

Bug#502997: package could be named better

2008-10-21 Thread Daniel Watkins
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 19:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Daniel Watkins wrote: > > A name (or alias) like 'iwlwifi-firmware' would be helpful (as I assumed > > that > > would be roughly what the package name for any firmware I was missing would > > be).

Bug#503029: False joystick events while high cpu load

2008-10-21 Thread Radek
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-8 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** While high cpu load there are false joystick input events like moving joystick to it's down-right position. Here is how to reproduce: 1. run: jstest /dev/input/js0

Bug#502997: package could be named better

2008-10-21 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:25:26PM +0100, Daniel Watkins wrote: > A name (or alias) like 'iwlwifi-firmware' would be helpful (as I assumed that > would be roughly what the package name for any firmware I was missing would > be). Please explain what you try to fix. Bastian -- The heart is not a

Bug#502997: package could be named better

2008-10-21 Thread Daniel Watkins
Package: firmware-iwlwifi Version: 0.13 Severity: wishlist A name (or alias) like 'iwlwifi-firmware' would be helpful (as I assumed that would be roughly what the package name for any firmware I was missing would be). -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT p

Bug#499823: no beep with snd-hda-intel

2008-10-21 Thread Tim Connors
bug 499823 is the same as 460410. It has not been resolved yet, but it looks like they are finally working on it upstream after more than a year: http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Changes_v1.0.17a_v1.0.18rc1 I just tried to compile and load it, but it caused an oops (perhaps there was i

Bug#502668: WhiteHEAT driver and firmware distribution for Linux

2008-10-21 Thread David Worthen
Hi Ben, We would be most pleased to clarify license as suggested below. Where do you suggest we place the text captioned below? Regards, david - Original Message - From: "Ben Hutchings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008

Bug#502606: [intel agp] stolen memory counting broken on G4X

2008-10-21 Thread Keith Packard
The patch looks good to me; sorry for mis-reading the G45/GM45 docs and breaking AGP. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#502948: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps)

2008-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#502948: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps has caused the Debian Bug report #502948, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps to be marked as d

Bug#502948: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps

2008-10-21 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:19:03AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > tags 502948 unreproducible moreinfo > thanks > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:09:37AM +0200, tomás zerolo wrote: > > Processes don't dump core under 2.6.26-1. Tested with kill -3 (re-booti

Bug#502948: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps

2008-10-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Thanks Bastian. I am the original reporter, as seen here http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20081020204904.GF4116%40alvh.no-ip.org Could you please send your /proc/config.gz to me, so I can check if I missed any important options? Mine is attached. -- Alvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chil

Bug#502816: cannot suspend

2008-10-21 Thread Hristo Hristov
Hi, A little more info. I managed to resume from suspend once, then I tried once again and this time the laptop froze. I didn't have time to test reverting other commits yet. BR, Hristo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Processed: tagging 502182

2008-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 502182 + pending Bug#502182: linux-image-2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-ixp4xx: no usbatm and speedtch modules compiled for this kernel There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of

Bug#498691: marked as done (2.6.26-1-686 (2.6.26-5) not boot)

2008-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:45:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#498691: Solved has caused the Debian Bug report #498691, regarding 2.6.26-1-686 (2.6.26-5) not boot to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#502896: marked as done (11: system fail to boot)

2008-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:09:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#502896: 11: system fail to boot has caused the Debian Bug report #502896, regarding 11: system fail to boot to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#502552: 498536 has a patch

2008-10-21 Thread Peter Daum
Ferenc Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This looks like the same bug I described in #498536 (which is a > different bug to what that thread was started with). Can you test the > patch referenced at the end? You're right - it is the same issue (and it can indeed be fixed by applying the mentio

Processed: Re: Bug#502896: 11: system fail to boot

2008-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 502896 initramfs-tools Bug#502896: 11: system fail to boot Warning: Unknown package '11' Bug reassigned from package `11' to `initramfs-tools'. > severity 502896 important Bug#502896: 11: system fail to boot Severity set to `important' from `c

Bug#498691: Solved

2008-10-21 Thread Lorenzo Vanoni
With the version 2.6.26-9 i have no more this problem. I think already the version 2.6.26-6 was ok. Best regards Vanoni Lorenzo

Processed: Re: Bug#502948: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps

2008-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 502948 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#502948: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#502948: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps

2008-10-21 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 502948 unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:09:37AM +0200, tomás zerolo wrote: > Processes don't dump core under 2.6.26-1. Tested with kill -3 (re-booting > with 2.6.24-1 > re-enables core dumps). I didn't test yet with 2.6.25. I'm not able to reproduce that on my devel

Bug#502948: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel 2.6.26 No core dumps

2008-10-21 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:09:37AM +0200, tomás zerolo wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 > Version: 2.6.26-8 > Severity: normal > > Processes don't dump core under 2.6.26-1. Tested with kill -3 (re-booting > with 2.6.24-1 > re-enables core d