Bug#490704:

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 01:07:06AM +0200, Wouter Cloetens wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:26:50AM +0200, Wouter Cloetens wrote: > > My next step is hpet=disable. > > And no hangs since. ... until now, after 4 days of uptime. The HPET is not (the only) culprit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: tagging 475319

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > tags 475319 + patch Bug#475319: linux-2.6: loading video kernel module causes Samsung Q45 to freeze There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing h

Bug#475319: patch for acpi video module freeze bug

The patch attached to the upstream bug fixes this issue. It can be found at . -- Sam Morris http://robots.org.uk/ PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078 3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sign

Re: Kernel package irregularities

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed a couple of discrepancies in the debian/control file of > linux-2.6 package, and I can't really tell whether those are bugs or > not: > > 1. There are no xen-enabled kernel images for amd64 architecture. right

Bug#495271: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: PATA HD not detected with Intel ICH9 and Marvel 88SE6121 chipsets

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.26-2 Severity: important /tmp/reportbug-linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64-20080815-4136-oCZDoW -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.26-1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-2) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian

Scheduling linux-2.6 2.6.26-3

Hi folks I'd like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.26-3 for monday. The following things are still missing: - VServer support for alpha, ia64, s390 and sparc. s390 does not build. Others untested. It should at least include all arches which had them in Etch. - PAE enabled VServer image

Processed: severity of 495260 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > severity 495260 important Bug#495260: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686: hibernate doesn't work on a Dell Inspiron 8000 with nVidia GeForce 2Go Severity set to `important' from `critical' >

Processed: tagging 494365

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 494365 + pending Bug#494365: 2.6.26 hangs on opteron CPUs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#495260: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686: hibernate doesn't work on a Dell Inspiron 8000 with nVidia GeForce 2Go

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-22 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software I've got a Dell Inspiron 8000 with 256MB ram and an nVidia GeForce2Go with 32MB ram, running KDE 3.5.5. I've got Klaptop running in the panel and configured to enable hibernate.

Kernel package irregularities

Hi, I've noticed a couple of discrepancies in the debian/control file of linux-2.6 package, and I can't really tell whether those are bugs or not: 1. There are no xen-enabled kernel images for amd64 architecture. 2. There is linux-modules-2.6.26-1-xen-686 package. All other linux-module packag

Re: Patch failure when changing patchlevels

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:46:14AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:53:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote: > > It appears that the script is trying first to unapply patch series 1 > > and then 2 (instead of correct order of 2 and then 1) and some patches > > fail because of th

Re: Patch failure when changing patchlevels

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:53:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote: > It appears that the script is trying first to unapply patch series 1 > and then 2 (instead of correct order of 2 and then 1) and some patches > fail because of that. Running '.../apply/debian 1' followed by > '.../apply/debian orig'

Bug#494384: first debian openvz 2.6.26 bugs

Sorry for the late reply, but somehow I haven't received any mail yet (just saw the answers on the web interface). > IMHO what the bug reporter means is nfsd loads fine with non-openvz > kernels (both 2.6.25 and 2.6.26), but fails to load with openvz 2.6.26 > kernel. Exactly. I tried it again