On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 10:54 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > This does not happen with linux-image-2.6.18-4-686.
>
> could you please retest against 2.6.22?
> it had nfs fixes.
Sorry, I never did this. But this is definitely fixed in 2.6.25-2.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Time is nature's way o
Hi!
I had this exakt problem on a brand new T61p using lenny and the 2.6.25-2 amd64
kernel. It happened when I transfered a 1G Mail directoty over my wireless
connection using ssh. Logging into the frozen machine from another computer
didn't work.
I tried reproducing the effect doing the same
Installing:
atl2-modules-2.6-itanium-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf/atl2-modules-2.6-itanium-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_ia64.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-mckinley-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_ia64.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-
Hi,
I reported the same problem with 2.6.25-1-686 back on May 15th and
submitted bug 481063.
I thought (and still think) that it is a Debian issue because 2.6.25
from kernel.org works just fine with vga=791.
Maximilian responded that no fb specific changes were made.
Now I tried 2.6.26-1-6
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:26:52 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could you please report upstream on bugzilla.kernel.org
> the debian kernel has no scsi specific patches.
> and let us know the upstream bug number.
Kernel Bugzilla #11194
--
And that's my crabbing done for the d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
> forwarded 490903 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11194
Bug#490903: regression: kernel panic on boot with megaraid_mbox driver
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwar
> Thanks Christian. This is looking like #464962
Yes it is. Looks like a bunch of "fringe" CPUs got downgraded from a
kernel perspective.
> running the 486 flavor is probably the best option for your system.
Ok. I wonder what that'll do to performance ... it's slow enough as it
is. Well, I can a
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:29:24AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> please cc akpm on your submission and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Done. Thanks for the pointers.
--
Matt http://ftbfs.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Thu Jul 31 08:03:21 UTC 2008
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: libxcrypt
> tags 489840 + pending
Bug#489840: libxcrypt_3.0-2(sparc/unstable): FTBFS,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:27:10AM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:57:44 +0200
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> >
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> > > Version: 2.6.25-6
> > > Followup-For: Bug #490
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:39:45PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:33:04PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > Here's a patch which makes netfilter.h include in.h and in6.h
> > irregardless of whether __KERNEL__ is defined. This allows my simple
> > test file:
> >
> > #include
>
- Forwarded message from Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Xen-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Virtualization Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:51:37 -0700
Subject: [Xen-de
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:25:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Solved with current 2.6.26 snapchot
has caused the Debian Bug report #491911,
regarding "Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!" with xen and redhat
cluster suite
to be marked as done.
T
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85i
Severity: normal
Hello,
update-initramfs uses mkinitramfs to create a temporary file containing the
new ramdisk and then moves (mv -f) that file to the final destination
/boot/initrd.img-$version. If /boot/initrd.img-$version has been a symbolic
link before
tag 487103 patch
thanks
Here's a patch which makes netfilter.h include in.h and in6.h
irregardless of whether __KERNEL__ is defined. This allows my simple
test file:
#include
to compile without errors. I'll try to get it included upstream.
--
Matt
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:33:04PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Here's a patch which makes netfilter.h include in.h and in6.h
> irregardless of whether __KERNEL__ is defined. This allows my simple
> test file:
>
> #include
>
> to compile without errors. I'll try to get it included upstream.
Is
16 matches
Mail list logo