Re: Userland compatibility fixes for 2.6.26

2008-07-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:38:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:09:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:20:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > Following the discussion some weeks ago I have a patch to fix most of > > > the problematic users

Bug#488022: linux-image-2.6.25-2-486: Does not boot on Vortex86SX (BUG: Int 6: CR2 00000000)

2008-07-29 Thread bruce robson
I've tried compiling various official kernel.org releases. The bug was not in official release v2.6.25.5 but is in v2.6.25.6. _ Stay in touch when you're away with Windows Live Messenger. http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overvie

Bug#490704:

2008-07-29 Thread Wouter Cloetens
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:26:50AM +0200, Wouter Cloetens wrote: > My next step is hpet=disable. And no hangs since. For completeness, I must say that I also disabled CONFIG_IRQBALANCE. Also; these hangs have not occurred at work where I mostly use Ethernet; only at home where I only use wireles

Bug#492918: severity of 492918 is normal

2008-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 # lilo fuck up severity 492918 normal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 492918 is normal

2008-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 > # lilo fuck up > severity 492918 normal Bug#492918: [PANIC][REGRESSION] linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: kernel fails to mount root on LVM2 Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > End

Bug#492918: [PANIC][REGRESSION] linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: kernel fails to mount root on LVM2

2008-07-29 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Subject: [PANIC][REGRESSION] linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: kernel fails to mount root on LVM2 Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 Version: 2.6.25-7 Severity: serious Justification: kernel panic *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello, I installed today debian on a MSI MegaBook PR200

Bug#471398: If this is fixed - where's the package?

2008-07-29 Thread Bob Goldberg
Hi- I can see in the message thread, it appears this problem has been fixed. However, I can't find a version of the ccs package other than ver. 1.03.00-2. I've looked everywhere, even in backports. If this was fixed, could someone point me to where the new package is? (it also does not show u

Bug#492903: linux-image-2.6-686-etchnhalf: parameter clocksource=pit doesn't work anymore

2008-07-29 Thread ViscountK
Package: linux-image-2.6-686-etchnhalf Version: 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1 Severity: normal I use VMware Server 1.0.6 on a MS Windows XP SP3 host. My guest is a netinst debian 4.0r3 installed as a standard system (console only). I've done: $ aptitude update $ aptitude -y upgrade $ aptitude -y instal

Bug#299014: Cats found eating human corpse

2008-07-29 Thread Ramsey
Your last chance for free credit http://ebberov.homepage.dk/default.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#491309: NR_CPUS in debian linux-images

2008-07-29 Thread Mike Travis
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote: >> You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see >> how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096 perspective.) > > May this change be applicable to 2.6.26 or will i

Bug#491309: NR_CPUS in debian linux-images

2008-07-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:19:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote: > > You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see > > how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096 > > perspective.) > May

Bug#491309: NR_CPUS in debian linux-images

2008-07-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:48:11AM -0700, Mike Travis wrote: > You could look at the 2.6.27 version of include/asm-x86/irq_vectors.h to see > how NR_IRQ's is somewhat lessened (at least from a NR_CPUS=4096 perspective.) May this change be applicable to 2.6.26 or will it break something else? Bast

Bug#491309: NR_CPUS in debian linux-images

2008-07-29 Thread Mike Travis
maximilian attems wrote: > hello > > after getting an irc query and bug report on our currently set number of > cpu for the upcoming lenny release: > /boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32 > > -> http://bugs.debian.org/491309 > > we came to this issue: > 10:13 1345623 3148364 417112 491

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping? >> >> I'd say a NEWS entry. >> > If the package doesn't

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:53:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: >> i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit NEW. > > Nack. Do you mind to be more descriptive? -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-29 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Otavio Salvador said: > Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > >> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dro

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping? I'd say a NEWS entry. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:53:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit NEW. Nack. Bastian -- You're dead, Jim. -- McCoy, "The Tholian Web", stardate unknown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping? > > I'd say a NEWS entry. > If the package doesn't exist anymore, it can't have a NEWS file. And spamming

Re: user-mode-linux 2.6.25 [was Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload]

2008-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Mattia Dongili wrote: > [d-boot probably not interested in this subtopic] > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:48:20PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup > > plan for lenny. release team wishes to have uns

Re: imminent 2.6.26 sid upload

2008-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, maximilian attems wrote: > the current release blocker is the linux-libc-dev patch by > waldi that is reviewed by vorlon to keep the lenny build chain stable. patch incorporating review got in. thanks waldi and vorlon! i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit

Bug#492853: [linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64] sky2 eth0: rx length error: status 0x4660100 length 598

2008-07-29 Thread taipan
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- It's working but I see this: # dmesg |grep sky [1.808667] sky2 :02:00.0: v1.21 addr 0xfdffc000 irq 16 Yukon-EC Ultra (0xb4) rev 3 [1.808986] sky2 eth0: addr 00:1f:c6:56:d0:21 [ 17.1

linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_arm.changes ACCEPTED

2008-07-29 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: atl2-modules-2.6-footbridge-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_arm.deb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf/atl2-modules-2.6-footbridge-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_arm.deb atl2-modules-2.6-iop32x-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_arm.deb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2

linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_sparc.changes ACCEPTED

2008-07-29 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: atl2-modules-2.6-sparc64-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_sparc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6-etchnhalf/atl2-modules-2.6-sparc64-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_sparc.deb atl2-modules-2.6-sparc64-smp-etchnhalf_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.1_sparc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-modules-ex

Re: Userland compatibility fixes for 2.6.26

2008-07-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:09:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:20:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Following the discussion some weeks ago I have a patch to fix most of > > the problematic userspace header changes in 2.6.26. > I believe the following other incompat

Re: initramfs-tools: buggy check for read-only /boot

2008-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:54:55PM +0400, CoolCold wrote: > Hello! I've found this > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=488865 is marked as fixed > in version 0.91e, but is it going to be fixed in stable aka etch? Should bug > be reopened or smth like this? > > this is cut from /usr/

Bug#299014: Bullies face huge health risk

2008-07-29 Thread Niki
US Soldiers kill villagers http://www.scdormello.it/default.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NR_CPUS in debian linux-images

2008-07-29 Thread Frederik Schueler
Hi, from cujrrent intel and amd roadmaps, expect 4-way and 8-way 12 core boxes during the lenny life cycle. I think NR_CPUS should really be set to 96, at least. On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:25:32AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > we came to this issue: > 10:13 1345623 3148364 417112 4911099

Re: Userland compatibility fixes for 2.6.26

2008-07-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:20:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > Following the discussion some weeks ago I have a patch to fix most of > the problematic userspace header changes in 2.6.26. I believe the following other incompatible changes should be addressed: asm-arm/unistd.h - chan

NR_CPUS in debian linux-images

2008-07-29 Thread maximilian attems
hello after getting an irc query and bug report on our currently set number of cpu for the upcoming lenny release: /boot/config-2.6.26-1-amd64:CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32 -> http://bugs.debian.org/491309 we came to this issue: 10:13 1345623 3148364 417112 4911099 4aeffb x86_64-255/vmlinux 10:13 133988