Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-6
Severity: normal
pciehp stopped working after upgrading to 2.6.25.
(note that the nvidia kernel module was only loaded _after_ the problem
occured so the kernel was not tainted)
to my knowledge, the bc4328 device was never pci-hotplugged bef
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:51:41PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Victor NOEL wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:31:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > >
> > > afair vserver needed a special ipv6 patch.
> >
> > I don't think the special ipv6 patch is for ipv6 in
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:44:27PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.05.2228 +0200]:
> > hmmm?
> > that is an script.
>
> yes, but unlike e.g. scripts/local-top scripts, it's a hook script.
okay for the boot scripts the same rules apply the
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Victor NOEL wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:31:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > afair vserver needed a special ipv6 patch.
>
> I don't think the special ipv6 patch is for ipv6 in host, but for
> ipv6 in guests !
>
> And this is why ipv6 should be enabled in
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 10:51:41PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, Victor NOEL wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:31:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > >
> > > afair vserver needed a special ipv6 patch.
> >
> > I don't think the special ipv6 patch is for ipv6 in
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 06:33:00PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.05.0054 +0200]:
> > > initramfs runs executable scripts in scripts/*/* at various stages.
> > > Albeit an error by the user or the package, scripts without
> > > executable
also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.05.2228 +0200]:
> hmmm?
> that is an script.
yes, but unlike e.g. scripts/local-top scripts, it's a hook script.
> why should a user be bothered if a maintainer fucks up the installation?
because the system may be left unbootable?
--
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 22:24:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#484565:
/lib/modules/2.6.24-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse.ko: Patch to
enable Dell 1420 touch pad's scroll is not working
has caused the Debian Bug report #484565,
regardin
Twas brillig at 16:14:58 05.07.2008 UTC+01 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and
gimble:
JD> Sure -- I'm CCing debian-arm incase someone there has a n2100
JD> running one of those kernels already -- it will take me days to
JD> build it :)
JD> Can someone verify that the rtl 8169 multicast bug
Twas brillig at 23:55:16 05.07.2008 UTC+07 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and
gimble:
MG> This behavior is repeatable even with BROADCAST flag on the
MG> interface (actually running tcpdump is critical due to some
MG> reason).
Oops, please ignore this :) Why did I think about BROADCAST?
--
also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.05.0054 +0200]:
> > initramfs runs executable scripts in scripts/*/* at various stages.
> > Albeit an error by the user or the package, scripts without
> > executable permissions get copied to the initrd by the hooks, but
> > then they don'
also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.07.05.0044 +0200]:
> > I would suggest to rename the hooks as follows and call the new
> > hook mount.
> >
> > top -> init mount -> top -> mount
>
> not sure if i'd like to play a renaming game,
Why not? It's for debugging purposes and t
Hi, it is not the sky2, it's an RTL-8169.
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:36:58PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> please checkout current 2.6.25 unstable linux images
> or even better 2.6.26-rc8 trunk snapshots see apt lines
> -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
>
> and report back on those, if s
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:31:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> afair vserver needed a special ipv6 patch.
I don't think the special ipv6 patch is for ipv6 in host, but for
ipv6 in guests !
And this is why ipv6 should be enabled in the kernel.
Anyway, ipv6 was enabled in 2.6.22 with vser
I'm sorry I forgot to update this thread.
There is no problem in the kernel, this bug must be closed.
The problem was that I was using the default xorg config file and that file
didn't had an entry for the synaptic driver. As soon as I modified the
xorg.conf and added the synaptic driver everyt
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 01:43:28PM +0200, kaouete wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-vserver-686
> Version: 2.6.25-6~bpo40+1
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hello,
>
> It looks like ipv6 is disabled in the vserver flavour of
> linux-image-2.6.25-2.
>
> I don't understand why it is, I can't find
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-vserver-686
Version: 2.6.25-6~bpo40+1
Severity: important
Hello,
It looks like ipv6 is disabled in the vserver flavour of
linux-image-2.6.25-2.
I don't understand why it is, I can't find any information in the
changelog of the debian package, nor in the changelog o
On Sat, 05 Jul 2008, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:56:59PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>>> Look at that: (updating initrd, duplicates the content of the cryptroot
>>> config file...)
>>
>>
>> right cryptsetup should maybe not write into /etc/i-t/conf.d
>> but in /usr/share
On 30 Jun 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I've remade grub as you suggested and that seems
to be OK.
Anthony
--
Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux
http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews,
and sceptical articles)
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:07:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#399165: linux-source-2.6.18: hostap_cs not talking to
Belkin F5D6020
has caused the Debian Bug report #399165,
regarding linux-source-2.6.18: hostap_cs not talking to Belkin F5D6020
to b
Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:05:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-2.6: IPv6 PMTU table not garbage collected?
has caused the Debian Bug report #411839,
regarding linux-2.6: IPv6 PMTU table not garbage collected?
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 489223 + pending
Bug#489223: kernel: niced processes get half of the CPU (problem with group
fair scheduling)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stop
reassign 489223 linux-2.6 2.6.24-1
thansk
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 09:10:41AM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Traditional and expected Unix behavior is to give dnetc a small share of
> the CPU and burnP6 should have a large share of the CPU. However here
> is the CPU distribution according to "top
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:27:42 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This card used to work with previous kernels.
>
> sorry for late reply.
> could you test up to date kernels aka 2.6.25 or even better
> 2.6.26-rc8?
>
> so that we can see if that bug still exists and upstream need
24 matches
Mail list logo
