Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.24+13
Severity: important
After an upgrade to the latest kernel and restarting the computer Grub failed
to boot. It turned out that the menu entries in
/boot/grub/menu.lst were pointing to an invalid disk, that is, I got
root (hd1,0)
instead
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
> forwarded 487725 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10997
Bug#487725: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: Got much trouble and message 'ehci_hcd:
HC died' when scanning image from '
package: kernel
version: 2.6.26-rc8
Hi,
I followed your advice and added the necessary repositories to get the
2.6.26-rc8 kernel.
It works great and is 5 to 10 times faster.
However I still get some issues :
- The computer freeze after a few minutes of inactivity (I deactivated all
hibernatio
Am Dienstag, 24. Juni 2008 13:35 schrieb Michael Meskes:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 07:42:28AM +0200, Adolf Winterer wrote:
> > > One more test please. Could you install and boot into the current
> > > 2.6.25 kernel in sid?
> >
> > I'd like to skip that, if possible, because as far as I know the NVi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 487287 linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Bug#487287: acpi: Negative value is show for temperature, fan constantly on
Bug reassigned from package `acpi' to `linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 08:49:46AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Because you have to use the same compiler version that was used to
> compile the kernel in order to compile modules.
This is only true on ia64 currently. The other arches stopped embedding
the compiler version in the module ABI.
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Why? Eevn if you must depend on a compiler (and I don't see that, either),
> why won't just any version of gcc do?
because you need to use the same compiler version that was used to build
the kernel in order to build modules against the headers.
--
Address:Daniel
* Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-27 23:04]:
> Why? Eevn if you must depend on a compiler (and I don't see that, either),
> why won't just any version of gcc do?
Because you have to use the same compiler version that was used to
compile the kernel in order to compile modules. And the
8 matches
Mail list logo