Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:38:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#488343: linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686: useless dependency
on gcc-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #488343,
regarding linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686: useless dependency on gcc-4.1
to be mar
Package: linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-7
Severity: minor
Why? Eevn if you must depend on a compiler (and I don't see that, either),
why won't just any version of gcc do?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architectur
ok so time to notify upstream, please file the corresponding info
in bugzilla.kernel.org saying that it is not a regression
but with the oops output.
lspci might help too.
My report against this bug (#487725) remains unchanged. (Kernel NOT Tainted)
I'm so sorry.
please tell us the upstream b
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 09:39:25PM +0300, Evaggelos Souglakos wrote:
> Hello,
> I have already installed the firmware-bnx2 package
>
> dpkg -l |grep bnx
> ii firmware-bnx20.11~bpo40+1
> Binary firmware
> for Broadcom NetXtremeII
You need the
Hello,
I have already installed the firmware-bnx2 package
dpkg -l |grep bnx
ii firmware-bnx20.11~bpo40+1
Binary firmware
for Broadcom NetXtremeII
dpkg -l | grep linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf
ii linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf 2.6.24+
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:51:52 +0200
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> These are the patches Andres made & sent upstream:
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/936294
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/937056
>
> If they don't make it
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:50:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #488208,
regarding virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6-686: vbox version 1.5.6 not 1.6.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:03:36PM +0300, Evaggelos Souglakos wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf
> Version: 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1
> Severity: important
>
>
> bnx2 modules is useless on this kernel package
>
> Loading Linux version 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.24-6~etchnhal
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-xen-686
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: important
Hi,
Here's the console log of my first boot attempt under
xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386 (version 3.2.0-3~bpo4+2). The second
brought essentially the same result. The guest system is an
up to date Lenny, the host is Etch, th
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:27:17 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#488265: linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf: Problem using
bnx2 module
has caused the Debian Bug report #488265,
regarding linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf: Problem using bnx2 module
to be m
Any progress on ndiswrapper?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:25:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #478314,
regarding linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-7 fails to compile on many
architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:26:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #480733,
regarding Attempts to build PCI drivers on platforms without PCI
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
Kernel 2.6.25 hangs on a Dell PowerEdge 850. This is the lockup captured
with netconsole:
[ 873.350023] NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU 0
[ 873.350023] CPU 0
[ 873.350023] Modules linked in: ac battery ipt_REJECT
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64-etchnhalf
Version: 2.6.24+13~etchnhalf.1
Severity: important
bnx2 modules is useless on this kernel package
Loading Linux version 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3)
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian
4.1.1-21))
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Version: 2.6.18+6etch3
Severity: important
Using the latest debian kernel on smp 64bit systems we can see random "general
protection fault: [11] SMP" stack traces.
This is always related to high nfsv3 traffic (e.g. imap or pop3 services).
I attach some stack
according to the build log
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.25-6;arch=alpha;stamp=1214551466
alpha linux image built fine with belows patch,
please have an eye.
thanks
--
maks
- Forwarded message from Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.25-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I'm not sure what's the preferred form of proposing kernel config
changes, but I'd like to propose support adding JFFS2 Summary
and Compressor support. These features are being used on many
products (such as Nokia n8x0 tablets), a
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:19:33AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> latest stable release is long awaited for testing,
> thus upload with high urgency this night.
I don't see a security problem which forces immediate action, which may
also varant the priority setting. Also common sense is to warn
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:19:33AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> latest stable release is long awaited for testing,
> thus upload with high urgency this night.
Nack.
Bastian
--
Even historians fail to learn from history -- they repeat the same mistakes.
-- John Gill, "Patter
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:17:18PM +, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> Log:
> add inconsistent kallsyms data patch by waldi
No.
Bastian
--
There are some things worth dying for.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
21 matches
Mail list logo
