Bug#486582: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: fails to mount xfs filesystem: I/O error in filesystem

2008-06-16 Thread Marc Lehmann
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64 Version: 2.6.25-1 Severity: important This kernel fails to mount xfs filesystems (2.6.24-1-amd64 can mount them fine). 2.6.24: XFS mounting filesystem loop18 Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: loop18 2.6.25: [ 78.284155] XFS: correcting sb_fe

Processed: Re: Bug#486582: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: fails to mount xfs filesystem: I/O error in filesystem

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 486582 linux-2.6 Bug#486582: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: fails to mount xfs filesystem: I/O error in filesystem Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64' to `linux-2.6'. > -

Processed: tagging 479773

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 479773 + pending Bug#479773: linux-2.6 [etch]: please add 3ware-9690SA support There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#475561: solved upstream

2008-06-16 Thread Juergen Kosel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, the bug has been fixed upstream; git id: 066519068ad2fbe98c7f45552b1f592903a9c8c8 Greetings Juergen -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQF

scheduling 2.6.18.dfsg.1-22

2008-06-16 Thread dann frazier
hey, We need a new upload to sync in security fixes before r4. I plan to do an upload this evening unless someone has a strong reason for a delay. thanks! -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#410807: Patch for "kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481"

2008-06-16 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Hi, > > I believe this issue is fixed by > http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/914304b3a3da > > Without the patch (2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1) I was able to reproduce the > problem by repeatedly starting 4 guest domains in pa

Processed: tagging 410807

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 410807 + pending Bug#410807: linux-2.6/etch xen support - kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481 Tags were: etch Bug#413947: linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-amd64: Kernel BUG at

Bug#481423: marked as done ([linux-modules-nonfree-2.6] uninstallable)

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:28:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #481423, regarding [linux-modules-nonfree-2.6] uninstallable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#482757: marked as done (kqemu-modules-2.6.18-6-686: no /dev/kqemu after modprobe)

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:30:32 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: kqemu-modules-2.6.18-6-686: no /dev/kqemu after modprobe has caused the Debian Bug report #482757, regarding kqemu-modules-2.6.18-6-686: no /dev/kqemu after modprobe to be marked as done. T

Processed: tagging 284221

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 284221 + pending Bug#284221: utter lack of acenic drivers on i386, hppa Tags were: wontfix Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#486394: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please add speakup modules

2008-06-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Daniel Baumann, le Mon 16 Jun 2008 08:56:56 +0200, a écrit : > > As discussed on the linux-boot and linux-kernel mailing lists, > > for accessibility purpose it would be useful to have speakup > > modules compiled for the debian installer, and thus to add them to > > linux-modules-extra-2.6

Bug#486394: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please add speakup modules

2008-06-16 Thread Daniel Baumann
Samuel Thibault wrote: > Should I add a toplevel Makefile in the upstream source yes, and to avoid code dublication, it's recommendet to call that very same toplevel Makefile from debian/rules targets too. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [E

linux-2.6_2.6.25-5_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all-m68k_2.6.25-5_m68k.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all-m68k_2.6.25-5_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all_2.6.25-5_m68k.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all_2.6.25-5_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-5_m68k.d

Bug#482940: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.24: saa7134-empress or saa6752hs problem)

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:39:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#482940: linux-source-2.6.24: saa7134-empress or saa6752hs problem has caused the Debian Bug report #482940, regarding linux-source-2.6.24: saa7134-empress or saa6752hs problem to be mar

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.25-5_m68k.changes

2008-06-16 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.25-5_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-5_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-5_m68k.deb linux-image-2.6.25-2-atari_2.6.25-5_m68k.deb linux-headers-2.6.25-2-atari_2.6.25-5_m68k.deb linux-image-2.6.

Processed: severity of 485857 is important

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29 > severity 485857 important Bug#485857: nfs operations performed by sfs-client hang on kernels >=2.6.22 Severity set to `important' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processing

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2008-06-16 Thread DDPOMail robot
=== linux-2.6: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #440445 linux-2.6 - dies after some time on t2000 since .22 - #485857 nfs operations performed by sfs-client hang on kernels >=2.6.22 = No migration to t

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Mon Jun 16 08:03:16 UTC 2008 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: google-perftools > tags 454841 + pending Bug number 454841 not found. (Is it archived?

Bug#486442: linux-image-2.6.25-1-iop32x: Thecus n2100: RTL-8169 network card receives multi/broadcast packets only in promiscous mode

2008-06-16 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 09:34:05 16.06.2008 UTC+02 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and gimble: >> I suppose that network dump is useless in this case, as merely >> running tcpdump makes cards work fine, so I'm pretty out of ideas >> what should I add to the bug report :) MM> Do you know if the same

Processed: Re: Bug#486442: linux-image-2.6.25-1-iop32x: Thecus n2100: RTL-8169 network card receives multi/broadcast packets only in promiscous mode

2008-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 486442 linux-2.6 Bug#486442: linux-image-2.6.25-1-iop32x: Thecus n2100: RTL-8169 network card receives multi/broadcast packets only in promiscous mode Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.25-1-iop32x' Bug reassigned from package `linux-im

Bug#486394: linux-modules-extra-2.6: Please add speakup modules

2008-06-16 Thread Daniel Baumann
Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, Hi, > As discussed on the linux-boot and linux-kernel mailing lists, > for accessibility purpose it would be useful to have speakup > modules compiled for the debian installer, and thus to add them to > linux-modules-extra-2.6. Here is a patch that does so. good,

Re: initramfs-tools: how to to avoid nuking tmpfs?

2008-06-16 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ("rcvd" and "twiglet" are part of normal debian "vtgrab" package.) > > never heard of but ok why not.. Next step is to add sshd there so that RCV traffic can be tunneled securely over it and I can access initramfs shell while the system is boot