On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 04:28:49PM +1200, Ewen McNeill wrote:
> As noted by Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> last year, with the
> default Debian Etch kernel, /proc/scsi/aacraid is missing on the Debian
> Etch kernel, even when the AACRAID driver is loaded and operating.
>
> Amongst other thing
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3.dsc
linux-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.24_2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.3_all.deb
linux-pa
(new) fglrx-modules-2.6-486_2.6.25-1_i386.deb optional non-free/admin
Display driver for AMD/ATI Radeon and FireGL graphics cards modules for Linux
2.6 on x86
This package depends on the Display driver for AMD/ATI Radeon and FireGL
graphics cards modules for latest Linux kernel 2.6 on x86 and co
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.25-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.25-1.dsc
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6_2.6.25-1.tar.gz
fglrx-modules-2.6.25-2-486_2.6.25+8-5-1_i386.deb
fglrx-modules-2.6-486_2.6.25-1_i386.deb
fglrx-modules
As noted by Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> last year, with the
default Debian Etch kernel, /proc/scsi/aacraid is missing on the Debian
Etch kernel, even when the AACRAID driver is loaded and operating.
Amongst other things this prevents using the Dell afacli management tool
to monitor/manage
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-7
Using this 2.6.24 kernel burning a DVD with growisofs. is
very slow. I can't see any error messages. According to the
trace the amount of data being written is tiny. It's
unusable like this. A backup that normally takes 25m would
take days to co
Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 485609 linux-2.6 2.6.24-7
> retitle 485609 modules.pcimap lists both pata_sis and sis5513 for [1039:5513]
> thanks
>
> On Tuesday 10 June 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It seems that the kernel is remapping /dev/hda using the scsi
>> emulation, which I did not enable
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:02:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#485688: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64: ACPI Error
(utglobal-0126): Unknown exception code: 0xFFFE [20070126]
has caused the Debian Bug report #485688,
regarding linux-image-2.6.25-2-am
FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.92a
Current version: 0.92b
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-4
Followup-For: Bug #484779
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.25-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.25-4) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)) #1 SMP Tue May 27 12:45:24 UTC
2008
** Command li
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-4
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.25-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.25-4) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.3 20080420 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-22)) #1 SMP Tue May 27 12:45:24 UTC
2008
** Command line:
root=/
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.25-3
Severity: important
Current kernel version (2.6.25) fails to work with my USB mouses and USB
flash devices.
I got next messages in /var/log/kern.log:
Jun 5 13:54:31 1501-debian kernel: [ 2242.188619] hub 6-0:1.0: unable to
enumerate USB dev
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:22:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: dv1394 oops on device removal
has caused the Debian Bug report #415709,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: dv1394 oops on device removal
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:18:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: p4-clockmod.ko: "Pentium M detected" with Celeron M
has caused the Debian Bug report #352602,
regarding p4-clockmod.ko: "Pentium M detected" with Celeron M
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.28
> tags 481613 pending
Bug#481613: linux-image-2.6.25-1-amd64: After resuming from suspend-to-ram,
there is no sound
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, st
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.25-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.25-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.25-2_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.25-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686_2.6.25-2_i386.deb
to po
(new) em8300-modules-2.6-486_2.6.25-1_i386.deb optional contrib/admin
Driver for the DXR3/Hollywood+ decoder cards modules for Linux 2.6 on x86
This package depends on the Driver for the DXR3/Hollywood+ decoder cards
modules for latest Linux kernel 2.6 on x86 and compatible machines.
.
Drivers
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 04:24:16PM +0200, Leo Weppelman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:01:55AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2007, Leo Weppelman wrote:
> >
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-686
> > > Version: 2.6.21-4
> > >
> > > The trace written to the console:
> > >
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.25-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.25-1.dsc
linux-modules-contrib-2.6_2.6.25-1.tar.gz
em8300-modules-2.6.25-2-486_2.6.25+0.16.4-1_i386.deb
em8300-modules-2.6-486_2.6.25-1_i386.deb
rt73-mod
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.25-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.25-2.dsc
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.25-2.tar.gz
atl2-modules-2.6.25-2-486_2.6.25+2.0.3-2_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.25-2_i386.deb
aufs-modules-2.6.25-
> It is enabled in the current Debian kernel images
for
> 2.6.24 and above.
> However it is not enabled in the Etch 2.6.18. 2.6.24
> is currently in
> proposed-updates and will reach stable in the next
> days (hopefully).
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:19:42AM -0700, Stephen Powell wrote:
> I am an IBM mainframe systems programmer. I support
> and maintain the z/VM operating system at my
> installation which provides the virtualization that
> allows multiple virtual Linux servers to share the
> same LPAR (mainframe par
Hello Debian kernel team.
I am an IBM mainframe systems programmer. I support
and maintain the z/VM operating system at my
installation which provides the virtualization that
allows multiple virtual Linux servers to share the
same LPAR (mainframe partition). I would like to make
an appeal for th
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:13:43AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> There are quite a few bug reports from 2.6.8 kernel packages. I was
> going to reassign them to linux-2.6, but then wondered whether this
> actually makes any sense.
My suggestion would be to close them all with a note requesting
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:37:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#426705: cciss: kernel BUG at drivers/block/cciss.c:2479
has caused the Debian Bug report #426705,
regarding cciss: kernel BUG at drivers/block/cciss.c:2479
to be marked as done.
This me
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:01:55AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Leo Weppelman wrote:
>
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.21-1-686
> > Version: 2.6.21-4
> >
> > The trace written to the console:
> > =
> >
> > kernel BUG at drivers/block/cciss.c
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:45:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#449116: linux-image-2.6.22-2-ixp4xx: The module
rtc-dev is not included
has caused the Debian Bug report #449116,
regarding linux-image-2.6.22-2-ixp4xx: The module rtc-dev is not includ
tisdagen den 10 juni 2008 skrev Martin Michlmayr:
> * Stefan Carslöv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-03 10:07]:
> > On my NSLU2 machine the script /etc/init.d/nslu2-rtc generates a
> > FATAL: Module rtc-dev not found.
> >
> > A little investigation reveals that the module (and also others in
> > the r
Hi Martin,
I'm sorry, but I no longer have access to this hardware so I
cannot tell if the problem has been resolved.
Regards,
Henrik
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:16:25AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Henrik Stoerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-05 11:02]:
> > I checked the kernel logs looki
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:09:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#422324: Acknowledgement
(linux-image-2.6.18-4-footbridge: System spontaneously reboots, logs "NWFPE:
ntpd[1694] takes exception 0001")
has caused the Debian Bug report #422324,
reg
On Tuesday 10 June 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> Which gets loaded is somewhat random and apparently the installer used
> the second (setting the system up to use /dev/hda), while after the
> reboot the first was used (changing the device name to /dev/sda).
You can work around this issue by blacklistin
reassign 485609 linux-2.6 2.6.24-7
retitle 485609 modules.pcimap lists both pata_sis and sis5513 for [1039:5513]
thanks
On Tuesday 10 June 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It seems that the kernel is remapping /dev/hda using the scsi
> emulation, which I did not enable and grub doesn't know about
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:56:53AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> reassign 484467 cpufreqd
> severity 484467 serious
> retitle 484467 query power status in /sys not in /proc
> stop
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:11:16AM +0200, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > It reboots because there is a rule in /e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 485609 linux-2.6 2.6.24-7
Bug#485609: Problem with device renaming and grub after clean install
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 485609 modules.pcimap lists both pata_sis and sis5513 for [1039:5513]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 443314
Bug#443314: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: kernel BUG at fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:716! on
NFSv4 client
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
Sto
Hi,
thanks to the firmware-bnx2 package I have been able to test the 2.6.25
kernel on this server. We now have several days of uptime without
oopses. This is much better than previous kernel versions that would
not last more than a few hours under load without oopsing.
Therefore I consider this
Hi,
I am not seeing this bug any longer, therefore I am going to close this
bug...
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 356074
Bug#356074: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: assertion failures in net/core/stream.c
and net/ipv4/af_inet.c
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Laurent Bonnaud <[EM
Hello Martin !
This was long time ago, since then I have updated to sid. I will take a look
for the new debian installer image (lenny) and let you know eventually.
Regards,
Jan
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jan Prunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-
* Stefan Carslöv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-03 10:07]:
> On my NSLU2 machine the script /etc/init.d/nslu2-rtc generates a
> FATAL: Module rtc-dev not found.
>
> A little investigation reveals that the module (and also others in
> the rtc directory) is not included in this kernel packages, but i
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:46:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#435236: linux-image-2.6.22-1-r4k-ip22: Kernel fails to
boot with the following error:
has caused the Debian Bug report #435236,
regarding linux-image-2.6.22-1-r4k-ip22: Kernel fails to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 435236 !
Bug#435236: linux-image-2.6.22-1-r4k-ip22: Kernel fails to boot with the
following error:
Owner recorded as Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> owner 449116 !
Bug#449116: linux-image-2.6.22-2-ixp4xx: The module rtc-dev is not includ
* Jan Prunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-30 11:37]:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-r4k-ip22
> Version: Kernel fault
>
> I tried to boot the kernel on indigo 2, running sid:
> Kernel fails to boot with the following error:
> arcsboot: ARCS Linux ext2fs loader 0.3.8.8
Apparently nobody responded t
* Henrik Stoerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-05 11:02]:
> I checked the kernel logs looking for this error message. The system
> was upgraded to Etch on April 10, and there are NO entries of the
> NWFPE log until after the DSA-1286-1 security update is installed.
> So it looks like this might be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 411150 linux-2.6
Bug#411150: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: hangs in ACPI during boot on Sony Vaio
PCG-Z600LEK
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.18-4-686'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.18-4-686' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 41
There are quite a few bug reports from 2.6.8 kernel packages. I was
going to reassign them to linux-2.6, but then wondered whether this
actually makes any sense.
Does anyone feel it's worth looking at these bugs (maks in particular,
since he's doing most of this work) or should I simply close all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 463785 + pending
Bug#463785: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: ath5k doesn't associate
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
El lun, 09-06-2008 a las 23:55 +0200, maximilian attems escribió:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 11:17:23PM +0200, Marc Fargas wrote:
> dup
> -> http://bugs.debian.org/481979
Sorry, didn't see this one.
> blacklist pc speaker,
> not a kernel bug closing.
Not a kernel bug, but 2.6.26 should not enter
* maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 23:51]:
> planing to switch x86 to it for 2.6.26.
> compiles, boots and works fine here.
>
> please update other archs too for the default Lenny gcc.
IMHO there's too little time to proper test this major change. You
often get obscure bugs when
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 11:51:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> planing to switch x86 to it for 2.6.26.
> compiles, boots and works fine here.
NACK. Too late.
Bastian
--
No problem is insoluble.
-- Dr. Janet Wallace, "The Deadly Years", stardate 3479.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
50 matches
Mail list logo
