On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 10:58 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > sfc arm, armel, powerpc, sparc 475467 yes
>
> merged for 2.6.26 so can be dropped soon.
Yes, I'm rather pleased about this one. :-)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Always tr
Your message dated Wed, 14 May 2008 01:08:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#481130: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: hwclock fails to
carry out select() calls on /dev/rtc after update from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #481130,
regarding linux-imag
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-6
Severity: important
the system clock is no more set correctly at boot time after
I upgraded the kernel from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24. This might be due to the
hwclock commands which becomes unable to perform I/O operations on
/dev/rtc
# hwclock
select
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.24-6
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
after reading bug #470163, I tried the option "nohz=off".
the next 2 reboots worked without a problem.
Kernel 2.6.25 is currently not available for me in unstable (still
beeing build for
Mapping testing to testing-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-s390_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-s390_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.24-7_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-common_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-1-s390_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-s390_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-1-s390-tape_2.6.24-7_s390.deb
linux-image-2
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92a
Severity: minor
File: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs
Look at that: (updating initrd, duplicates the content of the cryptroot config
file...)
mordor:/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d# cat cryptroot
target=lukspace,source=/dev/hda3,key=none,lvm=evg-root
mordor:/etc/in
> Version: 2.6.25-1
> > The bnx2 driver was included in the 2.6.22-3 kernel
> > (config-2.6.22-3-amd64:CONFIG_BNX2=m)
> > but not anymore in 2.6.24. Still this device is commonly used in Dell/HP
> > server hardware and so
> > quite usefull.
> please do a quick google research next time before rep
>
> What did you upgrade to 2.6.25?
>
> The server, or the client?
>
The laptop (client) was upgraded to 2.6.25 (it is running unstable)
The etch server is running 2.6.18 (latest in etch/stable)
> Can you also try with the version of samba in experimental (for your
> laptop, of courseupgra
(new) linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all-m68k_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb optional devel
All header files for Linux 2.6.25
This package depends against all architecture-specific kernel header files
for Linux kernel version 2.6.25, generally used for building out-of-tree
kernel modules.
linux-headers-2.6.25-2-all_
linux-2.6_2.6.25-2_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-image-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.25-2-amiga_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.25-2-atari_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.25-2-atari_2.6.25-2_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.
Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
Hi,
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
To sum it up, all post 2.6.24.4 kernels need the patch (2.6.24.4
included). This includes all 2.6.25.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll send it to -stable after running some
tests.
Sorry to bother again but is there a chan
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:52:31AM +0200, Heinrich Hiemesch wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-486
> Version: 2.6.22-6.lenny1
> Followup-For: Bug #466525
>
> There is no information about the bug in any of the logs on the computer. I
> made a photo of the screen before reboot and uploaded it t
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2008 14:44:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#411696: r8169: Fails on interfaces cabled at modprobe
has caused the Debian Bug report #411696,
regarding r8169: Fails on interfaces cabled at modprobe
to be marked as done.
This means
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:46:51AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> humm is that reproducible with a recent Lenny kernel?
> thanks for update.
I left the job where I had access to the hardware about seven months
ago. I seem to remember we were able to avoid the issue by using 2.6.22
or so so I
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-486
Version: 2.6.22-6.lenny1
Followup-For: Bug #466525
There is no information about the bug in any of the logs on the computer. I
made a photo of the screen before reboot and uploaded it to
http://img241.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=72042_R0011983_122_492lo.JPG
Othe
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2008 11:35:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#480637: linux-image-amd64 - waiting for root filesystem
has caused the Debian Bug report #480637,
regarding linux-image-amd64 - waiting for root filesystem
to be marked as done.
This me
rootdelay has no effect.
The next-to-last message is "waiting for root filesystem", the last message
is something about usb...
After that the system hangs.
I tried using sda instead of hda and it works!
Maybe it would be better to use uuid to avoid these problems.
Some time ago I heard about hda
Hi,
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> To sum it up, all post 2.6.24.4 kernels need the patch (2.6.24.4
>> included). This includes all 2.6.25.
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I'll send it to -stable after running some
> tests.
Sorry to bother again but is there a chance you can send
On Tue, 13 May 2008 02:35:21 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Michal Čihař wrote:
>
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
> > Version: 2.6.24-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I just trie
20 matches
Mail list logo
