Re: why the asix module disapear from linux-image-2.6.24-1-ixp4xx ?

2008-02-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-17 20:16]: > > I was using the asix module and I see that it was removed from the unstable > > kernel package for nslu2. > > Why ? does it move elsewhere ? > > The driver was removed by accident when the configuration files were > reorganized. I've

Processed: Re: Bug#462424: updated BUG (no openafs)

2008-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 462424 linux-2.6 Bug#462424: linux-image-2.6.23-1-686: Kernel oops in ext3_clear_inode Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.23-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.23-1-686' to `linux-2.6'. > -- Stopping processing here. P

Re: LTP Kernel DUMP Test Cases for Community Distro(s)

2008-02-17 Thread Subrata Modak
> Hi Subrata, > > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 14:07 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Can somebody direct me to the appropriate mailing list, where this can > > be taken forward ? > > > > For Debian, the kdump automation support seems is still not in place > yet. In order to run this test suite, a user

Re: why the asix module disapear from linux-image-2.6.24-1-ixp4xx ?

2008-02-17 Thread Gordon Farquharson
On Feb 15, 2008 3:52 AM, wahnby depinkou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I was using the asix module and I see that it was removed from the unstable > kernel package for nslu2. > Why ? does it move elsewhere ? The driver was removed by accident when the configuration files were reorganized

Bug#452069: 2.6.18

2008-02-17 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Just for the record, I think I'll leave this unfixed in 2.6.18 since the etchandhalf kernel will be based on 2.6.24 and therefore doesn't have this bug. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Bug#463751: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: iwlwifi module don't accept dhcp request

2008-02-17 Thread Daniel Huhardeaux
Bastian Blank a écrit : On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:26:35PM +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote: [...] wlan0: associated ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready wlan0: no IPv6 routers present The card is associated to the AP, at least the kernel thinks it received an correct answ

[bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2008-02-17 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #309964 # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5084 # * remote status changed: NEEDINFO -> CLOSED

Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6

2008-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status report

Bug#466242: Undefined lzma symbols

2008-02-17 Thread Mikael Petersson
Package: squashfs-modules-2.6.24-1-486 Version: 2.6.24+3.3-3 Severity: grave I have built a sid-based live image using the live-helper package. The live-helper scripts defaults to creating a squashfs filesystem that somehow can be synced using aufs. When I test it in qemu (command line qemu -ke