atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-4_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-4_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-4_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686_2.6.24-4_i386.deb
to po
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.24-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.24-4.dsc
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.24-4.tar.gz
atl2-modules-2.6.24-1-486_2.6.24+2.0.3-4_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-4_i386.deb
aufs-modules-2.6.24-
On Saturday 16 February 2008 18:51:37 Jonas Meurer wrote:
> And Martin, could you try to update your initramfs for the older kernels
> as well? Did you update cryptsetup in the last days/shortly before the
> issues occured?
Only old kernel i have here is 2.6.22-2-686. After i did an
update-initra
Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> - Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
>>>without a lot of hassle
>>> - If a bad kernel, with
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:31:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - Is impossible to release d-i with a different kernel from sid
>>without a lot of hassle
>> - If a bad kernel, with a bunch of ugly bugs, gets uploaded, all d-i
>>devel
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:16:06PM +0100, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 15/02/2008 Martin Ammermüller wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008 17:23:39 maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Martin Ammermüller wrote:
> > Tried that for 2.6.22-3-686 and 2.6.24 with no effect. And I'm pretty
> > sure t
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 06:42:05PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> For me, to think more about it, we need an agreement from kernel team
> that d-i can veto uploads of kernel. Obviously d-i team won't deny any
> upload with real reasons however this agreement this is a must from my
> POV.
Not acce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:40:47PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> If a unwanted kernel is uploaded to sid and we wanted to update the
>> udebs, for a release or something, we would end up doing it
>> t-p-u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> reassign 465812 initramfs-tools
Bug#465812: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686: [Regression] LuKS passphrase not accepted
anymore
Bug reassigned from package `cryptsetup' to `initramfs-tools'
reassign 462677 linux-2.6
found 462677 2.6.22-6
thanks
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 08:06:56 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 13:20:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Guillem Jover writes:
> > > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 23:11:32 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 26, 200
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462677 linux-2.6
Bug#462677: rm assert error on arm: ((status) == RM_OK || (status) ==
RM_USER_DECLINED || (status) == RM_ERROR)
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `linux-2.6'.
> found 462677 2.6.22-6
Bug#462677: rm assert error on arm: ((
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 04:26:35PM +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux wrote:
> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
> wlan0: Initial auth_alg=0
> wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:0f:66:d9:ec:a5
> wlan0: RX authentication from 00:0f:66:d9:ec:a5 (alg=0 transaction=2
> status=0)
> wlan0: authenticated
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:40:47PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> If a unwanted kernel is uploaded to sid and we wanted to update the
> udebs, for a release or something, we would end up doing it
> t-p-u. This would be done with minor testing and possible breaking
> lenny installer.
So? If we nee
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> i.e. can you safely enable X86_P6_NOP for other CPUs, such as AMD
>> K7/K8, VIA C3/C7, or Efficeon? If not, would it be more sensible to
>> avoid using these instructions?
>>
>> It appears that at least some VIA C3 CPUs do not support these opcodes:
>>
>> http://bugs.debia
Hi,
I tried with adding
options iwl3945 disable_hw_scan=1
in modprobe.conf: no changes. When I remove the module, in dmesg I see
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :0b:00.0 disabled
When I load the module, there is
iwl3945: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG/BG Network Connection driver for Lin
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> (cc'ing linux-ide)
>
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:32:59AM +0100, Bart Champagne wrote:
> > Just found another type of Seagate drives that shows this behaviour :
> > ST310211A
> > Can this one be blacklisted as well ?
>
> Yes, do you have a pat
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1
Severity: normal
I'm experiencing kernel Oops every few days. All userspace programs
stop responding, however iptables keep working.
lspci:
---
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333]
00:01.0 PCI
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460337: fixed in fai-kernels 1.17+etch.18etch1
has caused the Debian Bug report #460337,
regarding Fix ethernet interrupts for Cobalt RaQ1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:17:32 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461493: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-2etch.18etch1
has caused the Debian Bug report #461493,
regarding linux-2.6: [ia64] FP instructions/misaligned access cause silent user
data corr
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:17:32 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460337: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.18-1um-2etch.18etch1
has caused the Debian Bug report #460337,
regarding Fix ethernet interrupts for Cobalt RaQ1
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Installing:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.18+6etch3_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.18+6etch3_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.18+6etch3_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.18+6etch3_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.18+6etch
Installing:
ipw2100-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-4+etch3_i386.deb
to
pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/ipw2100-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-4+etch3_i386.deb
ipw2100-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-4+etch3_i386.deb
to
pool/contrib/l/linux-modules-contrib-2.6/ipw2100-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-4+e
Installing:
gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7+etch4_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7+etch4_i386.deb
gspca-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-7+etch4_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/gspca-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-7+etch4_i386.deb
gspc
Installing:
kqemu-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-4etch2_i386.deb
to
pool/non-free/l/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6/kqemu-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-4etch2_i386.deb
kqemu-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-4etch2_i386.deb
to
pool/non-free/l/linux-modules-nonfree-2.6/kqemu-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-4etch2_i386.
Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461493: fixed in fai-kernels 1.17+etch.18etch1
has caused the Debian Bug report #461493,
regarding linux-2.6: [ia64] FP instructions/misaligned access cause silent user
data corruption
to b
Installing:
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-
Package: gspca-modules-2.6.22-3-amd64
Version: 2.6.22+01.00.18-9
Severity: minor
I bought a Philips webcam, model SPC210NC. It is
listed that it uses gspca module.
I am using OS system GNU/Linux Debian lenny/testing. I have installed
this package
gspca-modules-2.6.22-3-amd64 2.6.22+01.00.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 466051 gspca-source
Bug#466051: gspca-modules-2.6.22-3-amd64: Philips webcam SPC210NC has image
turned upside/down
Bug reassigned from package `gspca-modules-2.6.22-3-amd64' to `gspca-source'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
28 matches
Mail list logo
