Package: linux-image-2.6.22-3-686
Severity: grave
This program run within an nfs4 mount causes the kernel to crash.
Program:
#include
int main()
{
return access(
"AABBCC"
"AABBCC"
"AABBCC"
Ok thnx
(y)
Sent from my iPhone
On 31/01/2008, at 08:03 PM, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:19:20PM -0430, Nelson Nieto wrote:
Hi guys,
there is a problem with xen and amd64 with the testing or unstable
kernel ?
thank
Package: linux-image-2.6.22
Version: 2.6.22-3-486
After I installed a used suspect hard-drive which has a bad history, I
booted from another drive. It hung just after the line:
checking if image is initramfs... it is
It hung at the same place when I tried to boot from the suspect drive.
It did
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:19:20PM -0430, Nelson Nieto wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> there is a problem with xen and amd64 with the testing or unstable kernel ?
>
>
> thanks, Nelson.
bug upstream instead of bitching around :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 463487 linux-2.6
Bug#463487: Kernel 2.6.22 hangs at boot (hardware-software prob.)
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.22'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.22' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.24-1
Hi,
It seems that the kernel does not select the proper driver for me. When
booting a 2.6.22 (and .23) kernel, I see:
bcm43xx driver
PCI: Enabling device :02:00.0 ( -> 0002)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :02:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 10 (level,
low) ->
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:04:23PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> - kernel to release
>
>We have 2.6.22 as a safe bed on lenny now and their udebs are there
>too however since EtchAndHalf intends to release with 2.6.24 and it
>has been uploaded to sid already I'm considering a better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ Reply-To adjusted to debian-boot so we can keep this discussion in a
single mailing list ]
Hello folks,
I've been working at migrations of packages for lenny and I think
we're more or less fine to define a timeline to the end of Febuary for
the r
reopen 433527
thanks
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:36:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the linux-modules-extra-2.6 package:
>
> #433527: add kqemu modules
Only on i386, not amd64.
Which, ironicaly,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 433527
Bug#433527: add kqemu modules
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456647: fixed in linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456647: fixed in linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#451116: fixed in linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:45:59PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> reassign to those suckers, afair they don't use kbuild properly
But something changed in the headers or kbuild package, because
it worked with linux-headers-2.6.22-3-686, and the madwifi / kqemu
stuff hasn't changed.
> anyway ma
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433527: fixed in linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460380: fixed in linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460380: fixed in linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:57 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461754: fixed in linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.24-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Accepted:
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686_2.6.24-1_i386.
In /boot/grub/menu.lst, I changed "root=/dev/hda1" for "root=/dev/sda1"
and it works now.
I have two disks in.
With another kernel (standard one), fdisk -l shows:
/dev/hda1
/dev/sda1
Once I have booted with the new compiled kernel, fdisk -l shows:
/dev/sda1...
/
Hi guys,
there is a problem with xen and amd64 with the testing or unstable kernel ?
thanks, Nelson.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
firmware-iwlwifi_0.10_all.deb: package says section is non-free/admin, override
says non-free/misc.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is cor
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463052: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
firmware-ipw3945_0.10_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-ipw3945_0.10_all.deb
firmware-iwlwifi_0.10_all.deb
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-iwlwifi_0.10_all.deb
firmware-nonfree_0.10.dsc
to pool/non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-nonfree_0.10.dsc
fi
linux-latest-2.6_12_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-latest-2.6_12.dsc
linux-latest-2.6_12.tar.gz
linux-image-powerpc_2.6.24+12_powerpc.deb
linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.24+12_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.24+12_powerpc.deb
linux-i
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.24+12_powerpc.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.24+12_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.24+12_powerpc.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-latest-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.24+12_powerpc.deb
linu
firmware-nonfree_0.10_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
firmware-nonfree_0.10.dsc
firmware-nonfree_0.10.tar.gz
firmware-ipw3945_0.10_all.deb
firmware-iwlwifi_0.10_all.deb
firmware-qlogic_0.10_all.deb
firmware-ralink_0.10_all.deb
Greetings,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 463052 + pending
Bug#463052: firmware-iwlwifi: new iwl4965 release available
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.24-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.24-2.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.24-2.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.24-2.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-2_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-2_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-powerpc_2.6.
linux-2.6_2.6.24-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.24-2.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.24-2.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.24_2.6.24-2_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.24_2.6.24-2_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.24_2.6.24-2_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.24_2.6.24-2_al
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 463402 linux-2.6
Bug#463402: smbfs: Crash when trying to mount remote cifs share
Bug reassigned from package `smbfs' to `linux-2.6'.
> found 463402 2.6.23-1
Bug#463402: smbfs: Crash when trying to mount remote cifs share
Bug marked as found in
Hi,
I picked up linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 from www.kernel.org.
The computer is Processor 2x intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz and
Debian is testing.
I did the following steps on another computer (x86_64) and it worked well
but not on P4.
here the steps:
# cd /usr/src
# tar xjf linu
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:10:42PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:25:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Which means that linux-latest was never updated at all for the 2.6.23 series
> > in unstable. Why?
> there is no 2.6.23 left in sid.
Duh.
I asked why it *wasn
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:23:24AM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
>
> I tried building several out-of-kernel module packages with
> module-assistant against linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686. Both kqemu and
> madwifi failed, because they expected $(ARCH) to be i386, but somehow
> it got passed as x86.
reass
severity 463422 important
stop
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:47:56AM -0500, Andrew Nady wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686
> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-17etch1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
overflated severity as usual..
> Before the update running linux-image-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 463422 important
Bug#463422: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686: Kernel panic ocured with the following
kernel.
Severity set to `important' from `important'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
tag 463422 + moreinfo
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:47:56AM -0500, Andrew Nady wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686
> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-17etch1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Before the update running linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 with no issues.
> The latest
Package: linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-1
Severity: normal
I tried building several out-of-kernel module packages with
module-assistant against linux-headers-2.6.24-1-686. Both kqemu and
madwifi failed, because they expected $(ARCH) to be i386, but somehow
it got passed as x86.
The s
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:53:46AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 802.11abg
> NIC (rev 01)
>
> Jan 31 10:45:28 percebes kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :03:00.0[A] -> GSI
> 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
> Jan 31 10:45:28 percebes kernel:
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:54:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-image-2.6.18-5-686: dpkg exits with error when
installing package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 463422 important
Bug#463422: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686: Kernel panic ocured with the following
kernel.
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:25:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Which means that linux-latest was never updated at all for the 2.6.23 series
> in unstable. Why?
there is no 2.6.23 left in sid.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-17etch1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Before the update running linux-image-2.6.18-5-686 with no issues.
The latest linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 (ETCH) kernel causing kernel panics and CPU
sync errors causing the syst
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.24-1
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC
(rev 01)
Jan 31 10:45:28 percebes kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :03:00.0[A] -> GSI 17
(level, low) -> IRQ 17
Jan 31 10:45:28 percebes kernel: PCI: Setting laten
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:42:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-image-2.6.17-1-k7: 512 MB SD card now "4 GB big"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:46:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug() patch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:44:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unregister_netdevice: Apparently scrambled printf format.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:18:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-2.6: Please consider adding my IPVS LBLC enhancement
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Will Star wrote:
> > They still depend on linux-image-2.6.22-x which don't even exist in
> > Sid anymore. By simply updating this dependency you would make a lot
> > more people aware of availability of new kernels. This expands the
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:14:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please add tipc_config.h
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
> hello, the music and sfx in rocksndiamonds are scratchy on my system.
> note that i have an onboard AC'97 sound card.
can you checkout 2.6.24 linux images from unstable, they have newer alsa,
if your issues are fixed? (install just fine in testing)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 03:49:44PM +0100, Will Star wrote:
> They still depend on linux-image-2.6.22-x which don't even exist in
> Sid anymore. By simply updating this dependency you would make a lot
> more people aware of availability of new kernels. This expands the
> userbase of testers, which i
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:09:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel: AT keyboard driver doesn't recognize some fancy
Logitech keyboard keys
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Will Star wrote:
> They still depend on linux-image-2.6.22-x which don't even exist in
> Sid anymore. By simply updating this dependency you would make a lot
> more people aware of availability of new kernels. This expands the
> userbase of testers, which in turn causes bugs to be fixed more
> swif
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:57:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line check for non-free firmware
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:57:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line check for non-free firmware
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
They still depend on linux-image-2.6.22-x which don't even exist in
Sid anymore. By simply updating this dependency you would make a lot
more people aware of availability of new kernels. This expands the
userbase of testers, which in turn causes bugs to be fixed more
swiftly, which is what we would
Hi,
just to let you know - 2.6.24-1snapshot.10206 compiled successfully for
mips and ip22 kernel actually boots ;)
reset:~# uptime
12:55:54 up 1 min, 1 user, load average: 1.05, 0.33, 0.11
reset:~# uname -a
Linux reset 2.6.24-1-r4k-ip22 #1 Tue Jan 29 13:51:51 UTC 2008 mips64 GNU/Linux
Flo
--
> 2.6.18-3-k7 hangs if 'apci=off' is specified as a boot parameter. The
> hanging occurs at different stages of the boot process, e.g.:
testing has 2.6.22, unstable 2.6.24, can we have an update on those?
they have newer acpi.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
> After upgrading to 2.6.18 I am no longer able to boot the machine,
> as the IDE drivers fails to load correctly.
can we have an update on kernel with newer acpi
testing has 2.6.22 and unstable 2.6.24
are they still seeing aboves failure to need "acpi=off" bootparam?
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Your message dated Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:58:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gfs-tools: unable to create partition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi folks
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.24-2 tomorrow.
Bastian
--
Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love).
-- Spock, "The Lights of Zetar", stardate 5725.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686_2.6.24-1_i386.deb
to po
63 matches
Mail list logo
