Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.9
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
iwl4965 has a new firmware available on intellinuxwireless.org (4.44.1.20),
it'd be nice to have it included in this package.
Url is
http://intellinuxwireless.org/iwlwifi/downloads/iwlwifi-4965-ucode-4.44.1.20.tgz
Cheers,
--
Yves-Al
Dear Margarita,
Thanks, please help include our driver in etch-n-half.
Please find Latest HighPoint Source files in 2.6.24 are located at:
drivers\scsi\hptiop.c
drivers\scsi\hptiop.h
Documentation\scsi\hptiop.txt
2.6.24-rc8-mm1 built-in it, you can get it from www.kernel.org.
FYI, HighPoint do
Package: redhat-cluster
Version: n/a
Tags: l10n, patch
Severity: wishlist
Updated Portuguese translation for redhat-cluster's debconf messages.
Translator: Américo Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feel free to use it.
For translation updates please contact 'Last Translator' or the
Portuguese Translat
2008/1/28, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Johannes Rohr wrote:
> > Unfortunately, loading the new iwl3945 wlan driver does not work as
> > expected.
>
> have you installed firmware-iwlwifi?
Yes, it is installed.
I'd like to try whether the 2.6.24 kernel fixes things, however, it is
appa
(new) linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all-m68k_2.6.24-1_m68k.deb optional devel
All header files for Linux 2.6.24
This package depends against all architecture-specific kernel header files
for Linux kernel version 2.6.24, generally used for building out-of-tree
kernel modules.
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-all_
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:09:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463006: linux-image-2.6.23-1-686: module iwl3945 fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:24:55AM -0800, May Hwang wrote:
> Dear Margarita,
>
> Can you resend Sean's email because I didn't receive his email?
>
> Up to this point, we are offering binary package based on customer request,
> because binary driver package only support one specific kernel version
Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Unfortunately, loading the new iwl3945 wlan driver does not work as
> expected.
have you installed firmware-iwlwifi?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net
linux-2.6_2.6.24-1_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-image-2.6.24-1-amiga_2.6.24-1_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-amiga_2.6.24-1_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.24-1-atari_2.6.24-1_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.24-1-atari_2.6.24-1_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.
Package: linux-image-2.6.23-1-686
Version: 2.6.23-2
Severity: normal
Unfortunately, loading the new iwl3945 wlan driver does not work as
expected. This is the console output when I try to insert the module:
> net eth1: device_rename: sysfs_create_symlink failed (-17)
> net wlan0_rename: device_re
Package: redhat-cluster
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
It is attached to this report.
# Galician translation of redhat-cluster's debconf templates
# This file is distributed under the same license as the redhat-cluster package.
# Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
Dear Margarita,
Can you resend Sean's email because I didn't receive his email?
Up to this point, we are offering binary package based on customer request,
because binary driver package only support one specific kernel version.
Hence it is inconvenience for customer and time consuming.
Please ad
Hi May Hwang!
On Jan 28, 2008 2:59 PM, May Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These Hardware RAID controllers offer GPL licensed Linux Open Source driver
> and have been accepted into 2.6.25 main kernel tree but since this is not a
> stable kernel version yet so our Debian system integrators stil
Hi May,
(This should all be prefaced with the statement that i don't have a great deal
of experience with kernel module packaging, someone from debian-kernel may
have more insight than me)
First I should say it is very thoughtful of you to contact the debian
community regarding your drivers, i
Dear Debian Developer,
This is May Hwang, Product Manager from HighPoint Technologies. HighPoint
have launched a new series of H/W RAID controllers based on Intel 2nd
generation PCI-express I/O processor, one main advantage is we are the only
manufacturer integrate this Intel Fastest SATA I/O
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> these are defined in libgcc.a (linking with -static-libgcc should
> resolve these symbols).
No. libgcc is not compatible with the kernel ABI.
Bastian
--
The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
-
Jörg Sommer writes:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if you are aware of this fact. Compiling the kernel release
> 2.6.24 on PowerPC with gcc-4.3 fails.
>
> LD [M] lib/zlib_inflate/zlib_inflate.o
> GEN .version
> CHK include/linux/compile.h
> UPD include/linux/compile.h
> CC ini
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:22:59PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>
> I don't know, did never see anything about inclusion after the
> following two discussions:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.hdaps.devel/772
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.hdaps.devel/857
> (both dated Au
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:55:37PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>
> Regards
> Evgeni Golov, maintainer of tp-smapi
side note question why does mainstream inclusion of tp-smapi
not move forward?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
as described in the subject, I would like to ask you to include
tp-smapi in linux-modules-source-2.6.
It *should* build fine on all arches, however it is only usefull for
i386 and amd64, as ThinkPads only include Intel processors :)
Regards
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:11:37 +0100 maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:55:37PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> >
> > Regards
> > Evgeni Golov, maintainer of tp-smapi
>
> side note question why does mainstream inclusion of tp-smapi
> not move forward?
I don't know, did never see a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462687 rt73
Bug#462687: rt73-modules-2.6.22-3-686: Rsyncing files from machine causes
kernel panic.
Bug reassigned from package `rt73-modules-2.6.22-3-686' to `rt73'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 460380 linux-modules-extra-2.6
Bug#460380: linux-modules-extra-2.6: FTBFS: unmet b-dep
linux-headers-2.6.22-3-all-i386
Bug reassigned from package `linux-modules-extra-2.6' to
`linux-modules-extra-2.6'.
> reassign 456647 linux-modules-extra-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 457751 ipw3945d
Bug#457751: ipw3945-modules-2.6.22-3-amd64: Do not load microcode
Bug reassigned from package `ipw3945-modules-2.6.22-3-amd64' to `ipw3945d'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 460380 456647
Bug#460380: linux-modules-extra-2.6: FTBFS: unmet b-dep
linux-headers-2.6.22-3-all-i386
Bug#456647: needs update for 2.6.23-1
Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged:
Bug 456647 is not in the same packag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 421948 pending
Bug#421948: wvstreams: build against newer Berkeley DB
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 425056 pending
Bug#425056: linux-image-2.6.20-1-k7: vmlinuz/initrd.im
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462910 kernel-wedge
Bug#462910: Please provide the udeb packages.
Bug reassigned from package `linux-modules-extra-2.6' to `kernel-wedge'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
reassign 462910 kernel-wedge
thanks
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> I think that atl2-modules is most important for d-i kernel to recognize
> the NIC of Atheros L2 chip.
> Please provide the udeb package of atl2-modules.
as said, d-i modules ("the udebs") are packaged seperately, thus
reassigning.
--
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>> Please provide the udeb packages for debian-installer.
>
> d-i kernel modules are packaged seperately by d-i team. please specify
> your request.
OK.
I think that atl2-modules is most important for d-i kernel to recognize
the NIC of Atheros L2
29 matches
Mail list logo
