hello frank,
big admiration for your tex work, i really appreciate daily.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:44:55PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi Maximilian,
>
> I'm sorry I don't understand what you want to tell me.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
>
> > a bug report is no
FYI: The status of the linux-modules-contrib-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.22-2
Current version: 2.6.22-4
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for mo
FYI: The status of the linux-latest-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 10
Current version: 11
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
FYI: The status of the linux-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.22-4
Current version: 2.6.22-6
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the linux-modules-extra-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.6.22-2
Current version: 2.6.22-9
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
Hi Maximilian,
I'm sorry I don't understand what you want to tell me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> a bug report is not a support request,
But this bug was a request to provide proper documentation. I even
offered to write it IIRC, if only someone helped me to find the
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> update-initramfs does not update initrd.img if /proc/mounts contains
> errors=remount-ro. Instead, I get the following message:
>
> WARNING: /boot is ro mounted.
> update-initramfs: Not updating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-rc2-x61s
>
> Reason for this beh
dann frazier said the following on 28.11.2007 17:55:
Out of curiousity, how frequent are these messages?
Very often:
Nov 28 16:30:07 kubrick kernel: Call Trace:
Nov 28 16:30:07 kubrick kernel: []
unlock_cpu_hotplug+0x3f/0x6c
Nov 28 16:30:07 kubrick kernel: []
sched_getaffinity+0x7e/0x93
Nov
Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#453294: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.91c
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.91c.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.91c.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.91c.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.91c.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.91c_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.91c_all.deb
Override entries
hello thomas,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Thomas Lange wrote:
> I'm using initramfs-tools and live-initramfs to boot my FAI
> environment. Therefore I have to append boot=live and root=/dev/nfs to
> get the live-initramfs scripts executed.
>
> If I use this order
>
> boot=live root=/dev/nfs
>
> it do
Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#451151: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.91c
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
initramfs-tools_0.91c_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.91c.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.91c.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.91c_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:14:14PM +0100, Martin Burger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any chance that this get fixed in Etch?
hey Martin,
Only fixes for bugs of >= important severity are permitted in a
stable release, so unfortunately this one doesn't qualify.
Out of curiousity, how frequent are the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:02:56PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> i'm pondering to revert it's removal for now until a patch
> with request_firmware is written.
NACK. You did not provide anything productive for the last discussions
about this so please stop that.
> upstream should hopefully un
now that both amd64 and i386 have a tickless kernel
it makes sense to enable CONFIG_HZ_1000 for both.
the current consumption is no longer a trouble and
we gain better interactive response. the timer
interrupts should no longer reduce server perf.
back in the early 2.6 game i disabled preempt,
due
announcing upload of linux-image 2.6.23 to sid on friday
it is already on 2.6.23.9.
please holler if you have outstanding issues.
remaining issues:
- tg3, bnx2 firmware_request()
the second one is particular bad as bnx2 is completly disabled,
i'm pondering to revert it's removal for now until a
Hi,
is there any chance that this get fixed in Etch?
Regards
Martin Burger
--
Martin Burger
Researcher
Software Engineering Chair (Prof. Zeller)
Saarland University, Dept. of Informatics
Tel. +49 (0)681 302-64783 · Fax +49 (0)681 302-64012
[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://www.st.cs.uni-sb.de/~mbur
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85h
I'm using initramfs-tools and live-initramfs to boot my FAI
environment. Therefore I have to append boot=live and root=/dev/nfs to
get the live-initramfs scripts executed.
If I use this order
boot=live root=/dev/nfs
it does not work, since the script /usr
Thanks. I've confirmed that everything's fine with 2.6.18-4...
Cheers, Jens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 452069 + pending
Bug#452069: NFS broken on Thecus N2100 (r8160 bug)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> severity 453253 important
Bug#453253: linux-2.6.18-5-xen-686: kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481!
Bug#410807: linux-2.6/etch xen support - kernel BUG at
drivers/xen/core/ev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 444271 + pending
Bug#444271: Slow hard drive performance on IOP32x (ARM)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forcemerge 410807 453253
Bug#410807: linux-2.6/etch xen support - kernel BUG at
drivers/xen/core/evtchn.c:481
Bug#453253: linux-2.6.18-5-xen-686: kernel BUG at drivers/xen/core/evtch
Package: linux-2.6.18-5-xen-686
Severity: normal
When attempting to create more than 32 LVM snapshots, the following error
message is sent from the Kernel:
device-mapper: table: 254:142: snapshot: Could not create kcopyd client
device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table
-- System Infor
Package: linux-2.6.18-5-xen-686
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
When shutting down a Xen DomU, the following intermittantly happens:
mrstabby kernel: EIP: [] retrigger+0x1f/0x35 SS:ESP 0069:c039feb0
Nov 28 13:09:16 mrstabby kernel: [ cut here ]---
26 matches
Mail list logo
