also sprach Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.16.0043 +0100]:
> I was hoping for
>cat /proc/partitions
> and maybe even
>fdisk -l /dev/hda /dev/hdb
In the future, consider asking for
/usr/share/bug/mdadm/script 3>&1
which should have *all* the output you could ever want. :)
In
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch4
Severity: normal
System was rebooted 2 days ago due to kernel security update,
I was trying to read some mail using mutt when app crashed
and kernel left info about some problem:
Oct 16 21:31:30 server kernel: [ cut here
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 446949 linux-2.6
Bug#446949: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: No S4 trip point in acpi thermal
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.21-2-686'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.21-2-686' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Hi Giuseppe,
Did you have a chance to check whether this bug stills exists with
current kernels (ideally directly from git).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sean, did you have a chance to tese these kernel images I prepared?
If not, I suggest we close this bug saying that it has been fixed in
newer kernels.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686
Version: 2.6.21-6
Severity: normal
The thermal zones do not have S4 trip point which menas the kernel does
not attempt to put the system to sleep, only stut down.
This is great annoynce even in case the system really overheats (for
example when the vents are obst
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686
Version: 2.6.21-6
Followup-For: Bug #422216
After a few days of operation the notebook would suddenly shut down with
this message left in the log:
Oct 16 14:17:46 nc4010 -- MARK --
Oct 16 14:37:46 nc4010 -- MARK --
Oct 16 14:47:58 nc4010 kernel: ACPI: Critical t
Hi,
I am writing to say the same thing happens to me when I upgrade to
2.6.22-2-k7 and I didn't wnat to open a new bugreport. The workaround
worked just fine for me.
cheers,
--
Gunther Furtado
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
> forwarded 446902 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8667
Bug#446902: Marvell Gigabit Ethernet Controller (driver sky2) gives bad UDP
checksum
Noted your statement that Bug
[ please keep bug report on cc,
that is not private conversation, cool thanks ]
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:20:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > update-initramfs -u -k $(uname -r)
> > what are you bootargs?
> > cat /proc/cmdline
>
> root=/dev/sda2 ro
>
> > also try to update your
maximilian attems wrote:
> sky2 upstream is reponsive,
> can you please test newer 2.6.23 linux image from trunk, see apt lines
> -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
The problem doesn't appear with 2.6.23. Looks like it was fixed with
this kernel bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:11:08PM +0200, Dieter Weber wrote:
>
> For Kernels 2.6.20, 2.6.21 and 2.6.22 the checksum of sent UDP packets
> is bad if no data was transmitted over a TCP connection before. Main
> symptom is that DNS doesn't work until any TCP connection is established
> and some d
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:00:06PM +0200, Eduard Wildknaap wrote:
>
> We got the following message when booting into 2.6.18-5-amd64:
>
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 176k freed
> /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.1: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or direc
Hi,
Thank you for you time Steve.
We got the following message when booting into 2.6.18-5-amd64:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 176k freed
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.1: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
Kernel panic - no syncing: Attempted t
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-686
Debian Release: lenny/sid
650 testing security.debian.org
650 testing ftp.de.debian.org
600 unstable
>> Are you sure that this is the case? As I wrote, 2.6.15 behaves ok, even
>> with window scale active, but 2.6.18 does not.
>
>The parameters changed with 2.6.17.
Found, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:21:25PM +0200, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> Are you sure that this is the case? As I wrote, 2.6.15 behaves ok, even
> with window scale active, but 2.6.18 does not.
The parameters changed with 2.6.17.
Bastian
--
Another Armenia, Belgium ... the weak innocents who alwa
>as already discussed X times, fix the b0rked router inbetween you
>and the named site.
>
>closing as not a bug on our side.
Are you sure that this is the case? As I wrote, 2.6.15 behaves ok, even
with window scale active, but 2.6.18 does not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Your message dated Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:16:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446855: linux-image-2.6.22-2-amd64: problem with window
scaling, again :(
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.22-4
Severity: normal
I observe this problem with 2.6.22-amd64, 2.6.20-i386, 2.6.18-amd64, but
not 2.6.15-i386. Try
wget www.copyleft-italia.it
and you should see it hang with the newer kernels after the GET. The
symptoms are similar to those d
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Miguel Martins Feitosa Filho wrote:
>
> I have the same situation described by Beojan in one of my boxes but
> not the other two - all three are debian testing.
> His solution - yaird - also worked for me.
that is a local workaround that is highly discouraged,
as yaird is no
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:48:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445688: Info received (Bug cause identified)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
22 matches
Mail list logo
