On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:46:10AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:39:06AM +0300, Henrik Wall??n wrote:
> > I forgot to point out that I use the amd64 arch, not i386. Maybe this
> > mismatch is the problem this time? (I used --force-architecture to be
> > able to install the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 440127 + pending
Bug#440127: CVE-2007-2242 fix breaks ipv6 rfc conformance
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Hello!
Please Cc: me if you don't reply to d-d (which I'm subscribed to).
It seems no one has replied yet, here my 0.02€...
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:58:32 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> MODULES=dep
>
>
> The size of the generated initramfs of initramfs-tools
> in the case of MO
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> reassign 441582 linux-2.6
Bug#441582: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686: can't purge cleanly
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.21-2-686' to `linux-2.6'.
>
End of message, stopping
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Samat Jain wrote:
> Kernels I've known to work:
> * stable's 2.6.18-5
> * testing's previous 2.6.18 kernel (I do not remember the version; and I
> uninstalled it before noticing this problem with testing's newer 2.6.21)
>
> Kernels I've tried that do not work:
> * sid's 2.6.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:41:12PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Could you please explain what is 'exported headers list', who maintains it,
> etc?
Linux upstream maintains a list of headers which are safe to be used in
userspace. asm-i386/system.h is not on this list.
> Also, what is *p
Bastian Blank, le Mon 10 Sep 2007 19:44:06 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Debian Bug Tracking System, le Mon 10 Sep 2007 14:19:34 +, a écrit :
> > > asm/io.h is not exported for ia64.
> > What do you mean by "exported"? The file is there
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System, le Mon 10 Sep 2007 14:19:34 +, a écrit :
> > asm/io.h is not exported for ia64.
> What do you mean by "exported"? The file is there, and some configure
> scripts hence find it and make C files #inclu
> asm/system.h is not on the exported headers list. This means that it is
> usually not save to use it from userspace. A quick check looks like this
> is the case. Don't even think about using it.
Could you please explain what is 'exported headers list', who maintains it,
etc?
Also, what is *pr
Debian Bug Tracking System, le Mon 10 Sep 2007 14:19:34 +, a écrit :
> asm/io.h is not exported for ia64.
What do you mean by "exported"? The file is there, and some configure
scripts hence find it and make C files #include it...
If it is not meant to be used, then just drop it...
Samuel
Improved flavor
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You guys are amazing with your delivery and customer service and your product
actually DOES work.
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, after taking Wondercum for 1 month, WE both are very happy and satisfied
with our sexual life.
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wondercum is a wonderful combination of fine herbs extract that are well known
for centuries
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When to use Wondercum?
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is why we have thousands of customers Globally.
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All because I am ejaculating the way I never have.
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:55:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line asm/io.h not exported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Is it safe? Are there any side effects?
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We only accept refund or return claims in cases wherein goods have not been
received or have been damaged during transit.
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We only accept refund or return claims in cases wherein goods have not been
received or have been damaged during transit.
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would you like to show your partner/s your sexual strength and power?
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 428852 moreinfo
Bug#428852: Please add tipc_config.h
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 377002 moreinfo
Bug#377002: linux-kernel-headers: #include does not define VM_MASK
correctly unless CONFIG_VM86 is defined
Tags were: patch
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
tags 377002 moreinfo
thanks
Please describe why you think this is wrong. Also you may ask upstream.
Bastian
--
No more blah, blah, blah!
-- Kirk, "Miri", stardate 2713.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
tags 428852 moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:25:21PM +0200, Martin Peylo wrote:
> I packaged the new Debian package "tipcutils" which includes tipc-config.
> This
> is a tool needed to configure the TIPC Protocol, which is included in the
> official Linux kernel since version 2.6.16 a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 440144 moreinfo wontfix
Bug#440144: linux-libc-dev: missing definition of rdtscl [linux-kernel-headers
regression]
Tags were: upstream help
Tags added: moreinfo, wontfix
> severity 440144 normal
Bug#440144: linux-libc-dev: missing definition of r
tags 440144 moreinfo wontfix
severity 440144 normal
thanks
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:15:03AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> rdtscl is not defined anywhere except in /usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h.
rdtscl was removed as linux does not longer assume that it is able to
ask the TSC themself. Also it
Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:28:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux/bitmap.h not exported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:36:29 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421816: fixed in openais 0.81-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:36:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:34:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line asm/system.h not exported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:30:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no kernel headers involved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
Accepted:
libopenais-dev_0.81-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/o/openais/libopenais-dev_0.81-1_powerpc.deb
libopenais2_0.81-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/o/openais/libopenais2_0.81-1_powerpc.deb
openais_0.81-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/openais/openais_0.81-1.diff.gz
openais_0.81-1.dsc
to pool/main/o/o
Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:26:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux/compiler.h not exported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:22:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
This is the first time, I am appreciating any product.
http://emagx.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 10 September 2007 06:12:24 am you wrote:
> sid kernel 2.6.22 just installs fine in testing,
> if that doesn't help see trunk apt lines
> -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
Kernels I've known to work:
* stable's 2.6.18-5
* testing's previous 2.6.18 kernel (I do not remember the versio
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007, Samat Jain wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-amd64
> Version: 2.6.21-6
> Severity: normal
>
> Output of dmesg from kernel exhibiting problems is attached. Let me know what
> else I can provide.
trying a recent kernel might help..
sid kernel 2.6.22 just installs fine i
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007, Andreas Laesser wrote:
> Package: linux-headers-2.6.18-5
> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> If you have installed a transmition-package like
> linux-image-2.6.18-686-smp it wont update your menu.lst. You have
> manually execute update-grub.
i don't ge
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686
Severity: minor
Removing linux-image-2.6.21-2-686 ...
Purging configuration files for linux-image-2.6.21-2-686 ...
rmdir: /lib/modules/2.6.21-2-686: Directory not empty
dpkg - warning: while removing linux-image-2.6.21-2-686, directory
`/lib/modules/2.6.21-2-686'
Exquisite Replica Watches
All the top Brands...
Visit our online Shop!
www.porkenmm.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch1
Severity: important
After upgrading from 2.6.18-4-686 to 2.6.18-5-686 the 2 3ware raid controllers
in my system are detected in reverse order.
With 2.6.18-4 the 3ware 7506-4LP (3w_.ko) is the first controller and the
9500S-12
please where is the problem assertion ??
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
44 matches
Mail list logo
