Hi there,
I've been trying to work out where, exactly, to post this question.
I'm not on either list and since this is (hopefuly) a one-off I'm not
going to subscribe at this time so please CC me in on-list replies.
I want to build a kernel package for the Xen subarchitecture with NFS
root en
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85g (and as I can see also 0.89)
Severity: normal
When running mkinitramfs or mkinitramfs-kpkg they both fail if the current
running kernel isn't compiled with modules support and therefore the directory
for modules doesn't exist. The problem lies in the fact
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.89
Followup-For: Bug #415474
I'm having similar problems with this. I custom-build a kernel for my
border router machine, that has no loadable module support and uses
various grsec patches (e.g. to #ifdef-out /dev/mem and /dev/kmem
support), thus leaving no know
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:45:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is fixed now, but in the meantime 2.6.22-1 has been uploaded. (I'm
> really tempted to disable the separate 'vserver' flavor for alpha to get
> manageable build times on my ev56 for testing...) Are there other currently
> pend
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 433640 moreinfo
Bug#433640: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64: time runs too slow
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
tags 433640 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:43:39PM +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> When using this kernel, the time of the system runs too slow. Minutes to
> slow in a couple of hours. This also confuses the ntp daemon.
Please show the complete kernel log, especialy the time sourc
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:45:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is fixed now, but in the meantime 2.6.22-1 has been uploaded. (I'm
> really tempted to disable the separate 'vserver' flavor for alpha to get
> manageable build times on my ev56 for testing...)
Drop the -legacy and -smp images
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:50:24AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:07:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:08:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > According to the projectb, only amd64, arm, i386, ia64 and powerpc had
> > > linux-2.6/experimental
Hello,
I have the exact same bug on my system. I can't boot with the version .21
but I have no problem with the .18
However, before getting the error message written by Stefan Schöttke, I have
that :
BEGIN: Waiting for root file system...
Done.
The system stays for a few minutes on the BEGIN l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 429064 + patch
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch
> reassign 429064 linux-libc-dev
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `linux-libc-dev'.
> thanks
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:25:29AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 06:51:20AM -0500, Nestor A. Diaz wrote:
> > Hello, i am using xen under etch with 2.6.18 linux kernel, however i have
> > some issues with the sata driver with ahci enabled, according to sata linux
> > kernel
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 06:51:20AM -0500, Nestor A. Diaz wrote:
> Hello, i am using xen under etch with 2.6.18 linux kernel, however i have
> some issues with the sata driver with ahci enabled, according to sata linux
> kernel maintainer, this is fixed in 2.6.20, i see that xen is not supported
Hello,
"/dev/hda1 does not exist" is a wide field but since I encountered the
same symptoms and worked around them, I can hopefully narrow it down a
bit.
I encountered the problem on two machines out of eight after upgrading
(2.6.18-4 worked fine on both). One is an old P2-300 box with soft RAID
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.22-1
Severity: normal
When using this kernel, the time of the system runs too slow. Minutes to
slow in a couple of hours. This also confuses the ntp daemon.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.22-1-amd64 (Debian 2.6.22-1) ([EM
Hello, i am using xen under etch with 2.6.18 linux kernel, however i
have some issues with the sata driver with ahci enabled, according to
sata linux kernel maintainer, this is fixed in 2.6.20, i see that xen is
not supported under debian packages for xen 2.6.22, is xen under testing
/ unstable
I had a similar problem for 2.6.20 and 2.6.21, but it was solved for me in
2.6.22... Does this work for you too? Can this be closed?
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> severity 433597 important
Bug#433597: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Panic with CR2: 00100108 on
SATA with software raid-1
Severity set to `important' from `important'
>
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 433597 important
Bug#433597: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64: Panic with CR2: 00100108 on
SATA with software raid-1
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 394742 + pending
Bug#394742: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: Bluetooth related panic
Tags were: etch fixed-upstream patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Grub can not see this, if I say update-grub it will change root back to hda1.
May be this is bug in grub?
I don't know how these packages communicate, or do they?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> fixed425534 2.6.21-4
Bug#425534: linux-2.6: ext3 filesystem corruption
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.21-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
fixed425534 2.6.21-4
thanks
Hello,
the described error did not occur with package linux-image-2.6.21-1-k7
version 2.6.21-4.
I will now test package 2.6.18-5-486 version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13, because
this is in etch-proposed-updates.
Here is some statistic:
---
22 matches
Mail list logo
