Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2007 08:36:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Linux ti_usb-serial: just making driver usable (without udev
scripts)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # daniel.leidert.spam[at]gmx.net
> submitter 364535 !
Bug#364535: Buggy /usr/share/doc-base/ispell-manual line 16
Changed Bug submitter from Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Daniel Leidert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 364837 !
Bug#364837: Seg
After further experimentation, I discovered additional problems that my
first patch did not address, namely that
1) Some FB drivers need the AGP subsystem up and running before they
are loaded and
2) intelfb needs intel-agp.ko, but does not have a dependency on it.
This version of the patch in
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-k7
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: normal
00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio
(rev a2)
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device 81cb
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr
hey,
I did a little research this morning to try to formulate an opinion -
here's what I found:
* This patch is not upstream and is unlikely to go upstream.
The ACPI maintainer doesn't seem to doubt its quality, but rather
believes its a development tool and not something distributors can
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10~bpo.1
Severity: minor
If using my USB soundcard directly connected to my notebook it works
just fine. If use a USB hub in order to enhance the number of available
USB ports the USB soundcard is detected apparently without any problem:
$
Our Last pick Doubled in 48 hours
Check this company out
Critical Care NEW
SYm-C.C.T.I
Stron g B reccomended at 20 Cents
Easy 300% on this one in Short term
This is a Real Business not a fly by night
Get in Monday, Don't Regret later!!
Detroit. ... The Nuggets play just one more home game befor
tags 416063 patch
thanks
This is another way to get the FB modules included that does not
require adding or changing hook scripts.--- hook-functions 2007-03-24 18:31:05.0 +0100
+++ hook-functions.withfb 2007-03-24 19:02:39.0 +0100
@@ -171,6 +171,14 @@
manual_add_modules "${x}"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 416063 patch
Bug#416063: initramfs-tools: MODULES=most does *not* include all framebuffer
modules
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 03:38:20PM +0100, Boris Andratzek wrote:
> Hello members of the debian kernel list,
>
>
> I'm new to this and hope I don't misuse the list in any way.
> Doing the update from debian sarge to etch on my server I ran into the
> bug documented here: bugzilla.kernel.org/show_
Saw this on IRC & wanted to record it...
dannf: can you please take a look at #412143?
hrm, I can't fix #412132 without abi bump
someone defined atomic_t as signed
r1, then?
yes
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85f
Severity: normal
First, my configuration:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/user/1000 % sed 's/#.*$//;/^[[:space:]]*$/d'
/etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
MODULES=most
BUSYBOX=y
BOOT=local
DEVICE=eth0
NFSROOT=auto
(You might want to add that command as a reportbug-
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:46:03PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Linux head moved the rootfs initialization just before the device
initcalls with the following message:
| Make sure we populate the initroot filesystem late enough
|
| We should not initialize rootfs before all the core initializers ha
Hello members of the debian kernel list,
I'm new to this and hope I don't misuse the list in any way.
Doing the update from debian sarge to etch on my server I ran into the
bug documented here: bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7177
I already made some comments there. I tried to contact the ma
Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:27:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line last response said it is working
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:18:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unresponsible submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:19:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unresponsible submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:17:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unresponsible submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibi
MONSIEUR OU MADAME,
S'il vous plaît ne soyez pas surpris ou offensé qu'un etranger vous ecrive.A ce
niveau de ma vie ,je n'ai aucune autre option que chercher de l'aide.N'importe
laquelle pourvu qu'elle me sorte de ma situation actuelle.
Je souhaite demander votre aide dans
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 251023 important
Bug#251023: [PATCH] An initrd level patch for customized DSDT
Severity set to `important' from `wishlist'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
20 matches
Mail list logo
