Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Upgrade from linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 fails on Sid, fails in the
configuration step.
# dpkg --configure linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Setting up linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 (2.6
You closed the wrong bug.
On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#304507: kernel-source-2.6.11: please apply the evms bd-claim patch
to debian kernel sources,
which was filed against the linux-2.6 package.
I
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: normal
I was having problems with WPA-encrypted networks in heavy load
conditions, e.g. when transferring files from a local server.
Every minute I would be disconnected with the error messages
---
TKIP: ICV error detected: STA=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I tried downgrading to 1-10 but now it shows the same behaviour as
1-11. Maybe something related to creating the initrd.img has changed
since the time 1-10 was released. My guess is udev.
- --
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuP
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 357533 moreinfo
Bug#357533: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: nforce4 driver (network, sata, usb2 )
don't work with 2.6.15-k7-4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of mes
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:39:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no response
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:42:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
I'm not sure if it's supposed to be broken (going by the name...) but
assuming it's not, it's wrong.
The current patch is
diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/Kconfig b/drivers/macintosh/Kconfig
index a9e747c..9e02447 100644
--- a/drivers/macintosh/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/macintosh/Kconfig
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 303490 moreinfo
Bug#303490: tulip driver doesn't open loop on Apple 100BaseT ethernet card
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:25:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:27:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 304507 wontfix
Bug#304507: kernel-source-2.6.11: please apply the evms bd-claim patch to
debian kernel sources
Tags were: patch
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tags 304507 wontfix
thanks
The bd_claim patch was never accepted upstream.
Bastian
--
In the strict scientific sense we all feed on death -- even vegetarians.
-- Spock, "Wolf in the Fold", stardate 3615.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:32:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line supported
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:27:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:22:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:23:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:25:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:20:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no xen k7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:15:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #405187
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:19:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
severity 406915 important
thanks
The i2o subsystem seems to be mostly dead. Only interface changes was
propagated.
Bastian
--
You can't evaluate a man by logic alone.
-- McCoy, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 406915 important
Bug#406915: access to large RAID arrays on Adaptec 2400A RAID controller with
dpt_i2o module causes system hang
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:41:26 +0100
From: Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#412139: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Not booting. Hangs
with message waiting for root
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:27:25 +0100
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tags 412139 moreinfo
I don't know if this is important, but the 2.6.18-3 kernel apparently
probes the ide interface in a different order that 2.6.18-4.dsfg-11
2.6.18-3:
Uni
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:48:20AM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> I'm sorry, normaly it shouldn't be a very important bug, but please
> think about these ones, who have to log the caused traffic, that's very
> terrible. So could you please add it to the next upload?
I do, but I have to prioriti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 412122 important
Bug#412122: network adapter (BCM 5704s) not working with kernel 2.6.8-12
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:48:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #365560
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Hi,
I'm sorry, normaly it shouldn't be a very important bug, but please
think about these ones, who have to log the caused traffic, that's very
terrible. So could you please add it to the next upload?
Regards, Patrick Matthäi
Bastian Blank schrieb:
severity 412132 important
user debian-ker
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:45:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #293195
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:50:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #314678: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:44:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#337974
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:41:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403479
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: serious
Tags: security patch
User: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Usertags: dkt-waiting-etch-security-update
The included version of the vserver patch allows contexts to renice
processes in other contexts. See patch.
diff -NurpP linux-2.6.19.
Your message dated Sat, 24 Feb 2007 00:42:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326602
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 412139 important
Bug#412139: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Not booting. Hangs with message waiting
for root
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 412139 moreinfo
Bug#412139: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Not booting. Hangs with message wait
severity 412139 important
tags 412139 moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 12:08:26AM +0100, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> After latest upgrade of 2.6.18-4-686 my machine stops booting when reasing to
> the message: Waiting for root.
Which kernel worked?
> The disk is found but just before find
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 412132 important
Bug#412132: cacct interface misscalced about 100 TB
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-kernel@lists.debian.org (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> usertag dkt-waiting
severity 412132 important
user debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
usertag dkt-waiting-etch-update
tags 412132 +patch
thanks
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:19:57PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> I think I've found a serious bug in the vserver image for amd64.
> We're running a daemon, which is logging the
And hello again ;)
I talked about that problem with the people of linux-vserver.org. It's a
known upstream bug, which is already fixed.
Here's the patch:
http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/k/delta-longatomic-fix01.diff
The counter overflows like I said at 4 GB ( like on a 32 bit system
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After latest upgrade of 2.6.18-4-686 my machine stops booting when reasing to
the message: Waiting for root.
The disk is found but just before finding disk on system I see this err
Hi again,
I'm very sorry, I pasted the wrong debug lines:
Fri Feb 23 15:42:01 2007 - cacct: 39375996 o.cacct 39375996 logged:
39375996 now: 39375996 method: 1
Fri Feb 23 16:00:01 2007 - cacct: 18446744072641133818 o.cacct
3222831651 logged: 3178567909 now: 18446744072596870076 method: 1
This
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-vserver-amd64
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
Severity: serious
Hello,
I think I've found a serious bug in the vserver image for amd64.
We're running a daemon, which is logging the traffic of all
hostmachines. Now I've found a very big mistake in the
/proc/virtual//cacct
Attached is a new patch that:
* Drops both footbridge and rpc from the armel flavour list.
(Martin Michlmayr.)
* Adds CONFIG_AEABI=y/CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y to config.iop32x and
config.ixp4xx as well, since they seem to override the main
config. (Joey Hess)
Apply as follows:
cp -a deb
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-12-amd64-k8-smp
Severity: grave
distribution : sarge (3.1) kernel 2.6.8-12 on AMD64
hardware : Fujitsu Primergy BX630
(http://developer.novell.com/yes/84281.htm)
Hi,
I installed sarge on new server using the net install cd (i386) and
under the 2.4.27-3-386 kernel
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.18-4-all-m68k_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-4-all-m68k_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-4-all_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-4-all_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.deb
linux-heade
linux-2.6_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.18-4-all_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-4-all-m68k_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-4_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.18-4-amiga_2.6.18.
linux-headers-2.6.18-4_2.6.18.dfsg.1-11_m68k.deb has incorrect size; deleting it
Due to the errors above, the .changes file couldn't be processed.
Please fix the problems for the upload to happen.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hello there,
I'm running the following Debian-unstable kernel:
Linux morannon 2.6.18-4-686 #1 SMP Wed Feb 21 16:06:54 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux
Aptitude says:
--\ Versions
i2.6.18.dfsg.1-11
Is this kernel compiled/generated with the Large Block Devices enabled?
Reason, I've mounted a 3.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 412086 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#412086: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686: Masquerading problem with dynamic IP
interfac
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686' to `ker
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> reassign 412075 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#412075: no files bigger than 1GB possible on udf-Filesystems
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6-k7' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'.
> tag
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 04:39:52PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, February 23, 2007 16:28, maximilian attems said:
>
> No, unfortunately it seems that the times between loading the usb host
> controller, loading usb-storage and spawning the usb-storage-scan thread
> are all asynchronous. S
On Fri, February 23, 2007 16:28, maximilian attems said:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:05:44PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>> Exactly, considering the low amount of complaints, I'd say there's a
>> tiny minority that is actually affected by this bug.
>>
>> Secondly, there is no way to have the band
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:05:44PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>
> Exactly, considering the low amount of complaints, I'd say there's a tiny
> minority that is actually affected by this bug.
>
> Secondly, there is no way to have the bandaid-wait for usb-storage users
> only, instead it would hit
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686
Version: 2.6.18-7
Tags: upstream,patch
Severity: important
Hello,
there is a bug in the gdth driver causing crashes and potential data
losses when using tape. The bug is also described and confirmed on the lklm
on 13 Oct 2006
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The
On Fri, February 23, 2007 14:16, maximilian attems said:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:46:08PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>> On Fri, February 23, 2007 12:11, maximilian attems said:
>> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Härdeman wrote:
>
>> > mika's case is general enough, it affects lilo on almost any
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:46:08PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> On Fri, February 23, 2007 12:11, maximilian attems said:
> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Härdeman wrote:
> > mika's case is general enough, it affects lilo on almost any
> > root beside ide and quick sata controller
> > and grub for
Subject: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686: Masquerading problem with dynamic IP
interfaces
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge6
Severity: important
Tags: patch
*** Please type your report below this line ***
When using Debian Sarge with kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686 as a nat gateway
with
On Fri, February 23, 2007 12:11, maximilian attems said:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Härdeman wrote:
>
>> maks...any progress on this bug?
>
> no.
> latest initramfs-tools is on mentors without any #401916 yet.
>
>> A new package which exports ROOTDELAY would be nice, then the rest can
>> be fixed
Package: kernel-image-2.6-k7
Version: 101sarge1 2.6.18+5
Severity: wishlist
Since http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1184
it is not possible to write files larger than 1GB on udf-Filesystems,
both on sarge and etch.
( "udf-deadlock.dpatch
[SECURITY] Fix possible UDF deadlock and me
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, David Härdeman wrote:
> maks...any progress on this bug?
no.
latest initramfs-tools is on mentors without any #401916 yet.
> A new package which exports ROOTDELAY would be nice, then the rest can be
> fixed in udev...
well i don't feel that is enough.
mika's case is genera
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Renato S. Yamane wrote:
> Patchs available to 2.6.20 stable Kernel comment by Stephen is attached.
>
> > sky2-pause-flush.patch
> > sky2-tx-timeout-deadlock.patch
> Subject: sky2: don't flush good pause frames
>
thanks that's a first help :)
but i guess they won't apply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64
> Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10
> Severity: normal
>
>
> It seems that the 32bit iptables package do not work correctly together
> with the (i386) amd64 kernel. After installing this kernel, shorewall do
> not start anymore.
>
> Here you
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On (02/21/07 18:20), maximilian attems wrote:
> > use mkinitramfs from initramfs-tools
> >
> > regards
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply, I will try this out. This leads me to
> another question, is there any way to integrate initrmfs-tools
> with
Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> The problem is that multiple xen versions (3.0-unstable, 3.0.3, 3.0.4)
>> can be installed and they are incompatible with each other. If each
>> one contained /usr/lib/python/xen then the packages would have to
>> conflict
Accepted:
gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7_i386.deb
gspca-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-7_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/gspca-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.18-7_i386.deb
gspca-modules-2.6-686_2.6.18-7_
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
unionfs-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7_i386.deb: package says section is admin,
override says misc.
unionfs-modules-2.6-686_2.6.18-7_i386.deb: package says section is admin,
override says misc.
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7.dsc
linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.18-7.tar.gz
gspca-modules-2.6.18-4-486_2.6.18+01.00.12-7_i386.deb
gspca-modules-2.6-486_2.6.18-7_i386.deb
redhat-cluster-
Thankfully to Al, who have some time to test this, i'm pleased to send
this patch proposition.
Debian. This update eliminates need of udev/sysfs reconfiguration,
thus no udev package patches needed. Firmware files from standard
driver package from TI must be copied or symlinked to /lib/firmware.
maks...any progress on this bug?
A new package which exports ROOTDELAY would be nice, then the rest can be
fixed in udev...
--
David Härdeman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
70 matches
Mail list logo
