Bug#407759: Should BLK_DEV_GENERIC be compiled into the kernel?

2007-02-11 Thread Toby Chamberlain
The business card iso downloaded on 10 feb 2007 did _NOT_ work on my system. It was still unable to detect the cdrom. lsmod showed the jmicron module was loaded. The system is an Intel DG965SS mobo, with lspci showing: 00:1f.2 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 82801HR/HO/HH (ICH8R/DO/

Processed: tagging 410375

2007-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 410375 + pending Bug#410375: network interfaces not autoconfigured for ipv6 after reboot Tags were: confirmed Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system ad

Bug#410497: sparc32 kernel is too big, fails to boot

2007-02-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 08:38:23PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Sunday 11 February 2007 18:21, Jurij Smakov wrote: > > I think that changing ABI without abiname bump is a more reasonable > > solution than dropping it completely. Impact would be pretty minor, > > given the number of people using spa

Bug#410497: sparc32 kernel is too big, fails to boot

2007-02-11 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 11 February 2007 18:21, Jurij Smakov wrote: > I think that changing ABI without abiname bump is a more reasonable > solution than dropping it completely. Impact would be pretty minor, > given the number of people using sparc32. Note that this does mean that any packages containing kernel

Bug#410497: sparc32 kernel is too big, fails to boot

2007-02-11 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 11:15:45AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > The change was commited one month ago and we had test builds since this. Yes, I should have tested it earlier, sorry about that. > You said yourself that it changes the abi so it now up to you to decide > what to do: > - Remove it

Re: debian-kernel-maint

2007-02-11 Thread dann frazier
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:47:58PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and > keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact > address for the user requests). This appears to be the most > straightforward way, as it re

Processed: Re: Bug#410454: linux first boot finishes with kernel panic

2007-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 410454 linux-2.6 Bug#410454: linux first boot finishes with kernel panic Warning: Unknown package 'linux' Bug reassigned from package `linux kernel' to `linux-2.6'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#410415:

2007-02-11 Thread Clayton
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:04:55 +0100 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tags 410415 moreinfo > thanks > > The report don't shows that this is a debian kernel. Please proove. > > Bastian Not sure what your criteria for proof is, in a previous e-mail I said "I am using the latest and great

Bug#410497: sparc32 kernel is too big, fails to boot

2007-02-11 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:54:15PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > The config variable CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, enabled recently for all kernel > flavours adds over 400K to the size of the compressed image size on > sparc32. As a result, it does not boot anymore (uncompressed image > does not fit into the

Bug#410415: #410415

2007-02-11 Thread Bastian Blank
tags 410415 moreinfo thanks The report don't shows that this is a debian kernel. Please proove. Bastian -- Women are more easily and more deeply terrified ... generating more sheer horror than the male of the species. -- Spock, "Wolf in the Fold", stardate 3615.4 -- To UNSUBS

Processed: Re: #410415

2007-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 410415 moreinfo Bug#410415: ntpdate unable to maintain stable time There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#410480: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686: PAE breaks Pentium-M CPUs

2007-02-11 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 410480 normal tags 410480 wontfix thanks On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 10:29:09AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > The change from linux-image-2.6.18-3-xen-686 to linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686 > of enabling PAE prevents operation on Pentium-M systems and other 686 machines > that lack PAE. The pat

Processed: Re: Bug#410480: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686: PAE breaks Pentium-M CPUs

2007-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 410480 normal Bug#410480: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686: PAE breaks Pentium-M CPUs Severity set to `normal' from `important' > tags 410480 wontfix Bug#410480: linux-image-2.6.18-4-xen-686: PAE breaks Pentium-M CPUs There were no tags set. Tags