Bug#366358: marked as done (Oops on shutdown with 2.6.16)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:42:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line still happening in 2.6.18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Processed: reassign 408635 to linux-2.6

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > reassign 408635 linux-2.6 Bug#408635: slattach only works every other time Warning: Unknown package 'linux-2.5' Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.5' to `linux-2.6'. > End of messa

Processed: reassign 408635 to linux-2.5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > reassign 408635 linux-2.5 Bug#408635: slattach only works every other time Warning: Unknown package 'linux-2.5' Bug reassigned from package `linux-source-2.6.18' to `linux-2.5'. > En

Bug#363700: how are the latest images doing?

hey Karel, Do the current daily builds work for you? If not, can you provide the bootlog for us? -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#409243: fails to boot.

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.85e Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system *** Please type your report below this line *** -- Package-specific info: -- /proc/cmdline root=/dev/mapper/vg00-root ro -- /proc/filesystems ext2 cramfs ext3 -- lsmod Modu

Bug#356537: bttv builds fine

lirc_gpio built fine for me using linux-headers-2.6.18-4-k7 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-9) and lirc-modules-source (0.8.0-9) both of which are targeted for etch. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#364957: does 2.6.18 see it?

hey mykhi, Does the 2.6.18 from etch/sid work for you? -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#356537: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.15-1: missing headers drivers/media/video/(bttv|bttvp).h)

Your message dated Thu, 1 Feb 2007 00:10:49 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bttv builds fine has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient'

On Thursday 01 February 2007 03:18, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > unfortunately there is no change. > > this is with 2.6.18-6-686. > > ghfield:~# apt-cache show linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 > Version: 2.6.18-7 This is _not_ the latest version. Please try with linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 (2.6.1

Bug#409240: Kernel and initrd image symlinks aren't updated properly

reassign 409240 kernel-package thanks Hi, Thanks for the report. Part of the problems you encountered are fixed in the latest kernel-package, but there is at least one bug. On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:54:04 +1300, Dennis Vshivkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Here's where the problem lies:

Processed: Re: Bug#409240: Kernel and initrd image symlinks aren't updated properly

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 409240 kernel-package Bug#409240: Kernel and initrd image symlinks aren't updated properly Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `kernel-package'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Bug#408446: [sparc] Installation fails on SunFire v440

Hi, I can try and have a look at the oops, however the 'RED State Exception' error is usually a pretty definite sign of some kind of hardware trouble. You might try removing different memory modules to see if that would help. I'll send a message to debian-sparc to see whether anyone else exper

Bug#409240: Kernel and initrd image symlinks aren't updated properly

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.18-7, 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9 Severity: important Attempting to install (ignore the fact that the .deb is from www.backports.org: the problem is clearly present in the latest versions in testing and unstable): # dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7_2.6.18-8~bpo.1_i386.deb

Bug#409238: linux-image-2.6-686: redundant "scripts/functions.orig" in initrd.img file

Package: linux-image-2.6-686 Version: 2.6.18+5 Severity: normal /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-3-686, and I suspect all other initrd.img files as well, contains a file called "scripts/functions.orig" which is identical to "scripts/functions" and seems to be a left-over backup file. -- System Informatio

Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient'

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:02:54AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > tags 409222 +moreinfo > thanks > > * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > adds nearly two minutes to the boot time as the timeouts on both > > ata1 and ata2 are nearly 50 seconds - 30 seconds waiting time each > > plus severa

Processed: Re: Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 409222 +moreinfo Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient' There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact m

Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient'

tags 409222 +moreinfo thanks * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > adds nearly two minutes to the boot time as the timeouts on both > ata1 and ata2 are nearly 50 seconds - 30 seconds waiting time each > plus several 5 second retries. Sounds like #391867 which was fixed in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9, pleas

Bug#409222: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686: on system with absolutely no SATA drives - 'ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient'

Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 Severity: normal adds nearly two minutes to the boot time as the timeouts on both ata1 and ata2 are nearly 50 seconds - 30 seconds waiting time each plus several 5 second retries. l. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Ker

Re: scheduling 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:51:12PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > can you comment from your side what is left in the pipe? > and on the corresponding time frame for it. I have one sparc patch which I would like in -10, fixing a BUG() on Niagara boxes. The discussion and proposed pat

Re: Wishlist: please be more patient [Was: Re: Bug#409171: problems with initramfs-tools.]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 05:35:27PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > reportbug explicitly adds vital info on the reported bug. > if you fire it up from the box where it is happening. > > i'd wish linux-2.6 would also add a bug script with lspci -vv and > dmesg output, it's quite annoying to have

Bug#408446: additional info

Hi, I have been looking trough the bug database and almost certainly found a previous report of the same fault: #360897 sparc64 tftpboot kernel driver failure during Gigaswift ethernet (aka cassini) detection. This bug is listed in "installation-reports", Outstanding bu

Processed: Re: Bug#409076: IPW2200BG Wireless LAN does not work

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 409076 ipw2200 does not work with mainline ieee80211 Bug#409076: IPW2200BG Wireless LAN does not work Changed Bug title. > reopen 409076 Bug#409076: ipw2200 does not work with mainline ieee80211 Bug is already open, cannot reopen. > thanks Sto

Processed: tagging 409171

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > tags 409171 moreinfo Bug#409171: problems with initramfs-tools. There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Processed: reassign 408910 to kernel-package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > reassign 408910 kernel-package Bug#408910: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: linux-image postinst breaks debconf by writing to stdout Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.18-4-686' t

Bug#408910: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: linux-image postinst breaks debconf by writing to stdout

I've filed the grub bug. I guess you can close this kernel bug. On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:17:06AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > Actually, this is by design: not redirecting stdout allows the > hook scripts to use debconf to talk to the user using debconf; and I > know for su

Bug#408910: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: linux-image postinst breaks debconf by writing to stdout

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:17:06AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Could you tell us which hook scripts are being used? If these > are scripts provided by a debian package, they need to be > fixed. Thanks. It's /usr/sbin/update-grub. In part it does: echo -n "Searching for defaul

Bug#408910: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: linux-image postinst breaks debconf by writing to stdout

Hi, Actually, this is by design: not redirecting stdout allows the hook scripts to use debconf to talk to the user using debconf; and I know for sure there are hook scripts that are being used interactively. The kernel-img.conf(5) man page has some language warning that any sc

Bug#409076: IPW2200BG Wireless LAN does not work

retitle 409076 ipw2200 does not work with mainline ieee80211 reopen 409076 thanks > anyway unless you provide evidence of the "does not work" > aka a fine dmesg error output, some lspci -vv output > test 2.6.19 and/or 2.6.20-rc6 see apt lines > -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel > i'll close y

Re: source text for driver for pegasus usb-ethernet

On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 08:54 -0800, Easthope wrote: > Debian readers, > > Someone please recommend where to find the source > text for the pegasus usb-ethernet driver. Should > I look in debian or in a Linux kernel site? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src$ sudo apt-get install linux-source-2.6.18 [EMAI

Re: Wishlist: please be more patient [Was: Re: Bug#409171: problems with initramfs-tools.]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:15:41AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:31:35PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > hey guy, > > > > you are going on my nerves, i explicitly asked you to fire > > up the reportbug utility to get the info i need to process > > your bug report. >

Re: scheduling 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:53:08PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > - Several reports of "Kernel unaligned access" for sparc in this thread: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2007/01/msg00054.html > > Cheers, > FJP latest svn tree has a 2.6.16.39 sparc32 fix, no idea if it is related, might be in

Wishlist: please be more patient [Was: Re: Bug#409171: problems with initramfs-tools.]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:31:35PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > hey guy, > > you are going on my nerves, i explicitly asked you to fire > up the reportbug utility to get the info i need to process > your bug report. Can we please keep it professional and avoid such displays of bad temper in

Bug#408614: marked as done (modprobe error "Error inserting powernow_k7 [..] No such device" as in bug #378975)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:12:08 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408614: modprobe error "Error inserting powernow_k7 [..] No such device" as in bug #378975 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#409076: IPW2200BG Wireless LAN does not work

tags 409076 moreinfo reassign 409076 linux-2.6 stop On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:09:08PM +0100, Bernhard wrote: > Package: kernel-image-2.6-686 > Version: 2.6.18 > > After installation of Debian "etch" (testing), the wireless lan card > Intel 2200BG does not work. > WPA encryption is used with wpa_

Processed: Re: Bug#409076: IPW2200BG Wireless LAN does not work

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 409076 moreinfo Bug#409076: IPW2200BG Wireless LAN does not work There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > reassign 409076 linux-2.6 Bug#409076: IPW2200BG Wireless LAN does not work Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `linux-2.6'. > s

Re: scheduling 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 14:17, maximilian attems wrote: > > - #407759, #394344: some popular hardware not supported (JMicron > > controller) > > this should be fixed by -10, > added the ide driver for it. Great. Has it been verified that this indeed fixes the issue? IIUC there will now be t

Re: scheduling 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10

On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:53:08PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 12:18, maximilian attems wrote: > > ok cool thanks, > > so should we wait for the 10 days of -9 to reach testing, > > or shall we upload immediately? > > My suggestion would be not to wait. > > OTOH I would

Bug#409171: problems with initramfs-tools.

hey guy, you are going on my nerves, i explicitly asked you to fire up the reportbug utility to get the info i need to process your bug report. On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:08:28PM +0100, Mauro Sanna wrote: > I've installed sarge with lvm and kernel 2.6.8 with initrd. > At the end of installation I

Bug#409171: problems with initramfs-tools.

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.85e I've installed sarge with lvm and kernel 2.6.8 with initrd. At the end of installation I reboot the system and all works well. Then I upgrade to etch. I install the new kernel 2.6.18 and initramfs-tools. I create the new initrd then, at the end of u

Re: scheduling 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 12:53, Frans Pop wrote: > My suggestion would be not to wait. You'll also need to update kernel-latest before migration can happen. pgpydyV4EBUvx.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: scheduling 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 12:18, maximilian attems wrote: > ok cool thanks, > so should we wait for the 10 days of -9 to reach testing, > or shall we upload immediately? My suggestion would be not to wait. OTOH I would appreciate an inventory and discussion of open issues. Main issues that I h

Re: scheduling 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10

On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 03:34:42PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:51:12PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > can you comment from your side what is left in the pipe? > > and on the corresponding time frame for it. > > fwiw, I just committed the fix for raid1 recovery now

Bug#377677: marked as done (No sound from Creative Sound Blaster 16 PCI with 2.6 kernel)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:00:26 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#377677: No sound from Creative Sound Blaster 16 PCI with 2.6 kernel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Re: initramfs-tools

[ correcting the ml cc *grml* ] On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:36:54PM +0100, Mauro Sanna wrote: > maximilian attems wrote: > >[ keep the mailinglist on cc, that is _not_ a private request! ] > > > >On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mauro Sanna wrote: > > > >>Il giorno lun, 29/01/2007 alle 15.43 +0100, maximilian