Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

Hi Dann, On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:19:43AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:50:47AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:03:21 +0100, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/other$ uname -r > > 2.4.34b > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home

Bug#407757: xen kernel makes dom0 slower, more information

Hi, I made the same test on a 32 bit K7 (Athlon 2400+) system: Xen works very well. My stupid test script (see below) needs with - the debian kernel 2.6.18-3-k7 1m9.938s - the xen kernel 2.6.18-3-xen-k7, but without libc6-xen (stupid, I know) 1m34.722s, - the xen kernel 2.6.18-3-xen-k7 and with

Bug#407671: kernel 2.6.18: Confusion about Macintosh backlight configuration

On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 16:05 +0100, Matthias Grimm wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:33:35 +1100 > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Which solution you prefer is up to you but I would be glad if at least > > > solution #1 could be realised. > > > > For now, at least, what pre

mkvmlinuz_31_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: mkvmlinuz_31.dsc to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_31.dsc mkvmlinuz_31.tar.gz to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_31.tar.gz mkvmlinuz_31_powerpc.deb to pool/main/m/mkvmlinuz/mkvmlinuz_31_powerpc.deb Override entries for your package: mkvmlinuz_31.dsc - source devel mkvmlinuz_31_p

Processing of mkvmlinuz_31_powerpc.changes

mkvmlinuz_31_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mkvmlinuz_31.dsc mkvmlinuz_31.tar.gz mkvmlinuz_31_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:50:47AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:03:21 +0100, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/other$ uname -r > 2.4.34b > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/other$ mkdir test > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/other$ ln -s test testlink > ln: crea

Bug#407671: kernel 2.6.18: Confusion about Macintosh backlight configuration

On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:33:35 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Which solution you prefer is up to you but I would be glad if at least > > solution #1 could be realised. > > For now, at least, what prevents you from having all enabled and have > pbbuttonsd still call PMU_

Processed: Re: Bug#407300: installation reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 407300 linux-2.6 Bug#407300: installation reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'. > forcemerge 407759 407300 Bug#407759: Should BLK_DEV_GENERIC be compiled into the kernel? Bug#407300: installation reports Fo

Processed: Re: Bug#407759: Should BLK_DEV_GENERIC be compiled into the kernel for CD support on Intel 965 Mobos?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 407759 linux-2.6 Bug#407759: Set-up attempt failed. Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'. > retitle 407759 Should BLK_DEV_GENERIC be compiled into the kernel? Bug#407759: Set-up attempt failed. Changed Bug title.

Bug#406466: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7: Kernel Crash with sky2 driver. System freeze

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Matthias Kreis wrote: > Hello Maximilan > > Error is still here with the sid kernel. I will run a memory check > overnight, just to be sure... > > Regards Matthias Kreis ok so how about going to 2.6.19 or 2.6.20-rc5 images on buildserver trunk see apt lines -> http://wiki.d

Processed: closing 399813

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > close 399813 Bug#399813: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: SATA failure after 2.6.16 -> 2.6.17 upgrade 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, se

Bug#407386: linux-image-2.6.18-3-powerpc: No audio out on PowerBook3,2 (regression vs 2.6.17)

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > A new snd-aoa driver was mentioned in bug 381658, but I couldn't find > a NEWS file in /usr/share/doc/linux-image-2.6.18-3-powerpc, so I don't > know what's new and what changes are needed. > yes indeed why don't you try it, sorry i'm out. -- mak

Bug#383849: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686: Problem with atkbd.c

[ please keep the bug report on cc ] On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Luis Uribe wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 05:08:27PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > any update on the latest linux image 2.6.18 in etch/unstable? > > None, i'm using 2.6.18-3 and still have the problem. > > Regards > > -- > Luis

Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:36:30 +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > As you can see I now can see the symbolic links perfectly and they work as >> > expected. >> > >> > In fact, this patch is working so well that it poses a security risk, as >> > now >> > the devices on

Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:18:16 +0100, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Grant, just to be sure, are you really certain that you tried the fixed kernel >? >It is possible that you booted a wrong kernel during one of your tests. I'm >intrigued by the fact that it changed nothing for you and t

Bug#360478: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7: mount encrypted ide crash)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:36:08 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360478: linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7: mount encrypted ide crash has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#381308: marked as done (Subject: udev not loading mousedev module for logitech cordless desktop combo)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:25:36 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#381308: Subject: udev not loading mousedev module for logitech cordless desktop combo has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#386352: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: ide driver lockup)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:22:59 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386352: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686: ide driver lockup has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#380693: marked as done (hda: dma_timer_expiry)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:26:39 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380693: hda: dma_timer_expiry has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

> > As you can see I now can see the symbolic links perfectly and they work as > > expected. > > > > In fact, this patch is working so well that it poses a security risk, as now > > the devices on my /mnt/dev directory are not only seen as devices (like they > > were seen on 2.4.33) but they also

Bug#407735: closed by maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#407735: 2.6.18-3-686 tcp_window_scaling serious problem)

On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:06:14PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If it were a bug with "my" infrastructure, how could the problem occur > only with certain sites? Why would the problem occur always with the > same exact sites? Why would the problem never have occured with > different opera

Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

Hi Santiago ! On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:54:00AM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > Hi again! > > I tried to replicate the problem at home during the weekend with my laptop, > but I couldn't get it to show links with previous kernels, so I guess I had > something different on my samba serve

Re: problems with latest smbfs changes on 2.4.34 and security backports

Hi again! I tried to replicate the problem at home during the weekend with my laptop, but I couldn't get it to show links with previous kernels, so I guess I had something different on my samba server or similar, I'm at the real machines now so I have done the real tests and they look promising. I

Bug#406477: Laptop mode?

Hi Josef, > I have laptop-mode running, maybe it has something to do with it? I doubt. The machines in question here at our side are dedicated server and thus not running in laptop mode. ;) -- Ciao...//Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROT

Bug#406477: Kernel oopses on non-SMP amd64 as well

Hi! Just discovered today: Jan 21 03:42:05 s15222724 kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-10") meta-data dev dm-10 block 0x648778 ("xfs_trans_read_buf") error 5 buf count 4096 Jan 21 03:42:05 s15222724 kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("dm-10") meta-data dev dm-10 block 0x12c0040 ("