On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:17:28AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > Bug with freeze also exists in 2.6.18-3 (package version 2.6.18-7) - no
> > messages in dmesg, no interrupts.
> > It is dual lan board with only one port being used.
> > rmmod/modprobe sequence brings NIC ba
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:49:49PM +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> I started to test this and then realised that there is a small problem.
> The X1 doesn't have a cd drive so I cannot test it. Is there any chance
> of a netboot image.
Sure, it is available at
http://www.wooyd.org/debian/iso/boo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 325397
Bug#325397: [amd64] Crash X sometimes with powernow-k8
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> reassign 325397 linux-2.6
Bug#325397: [amd64] Crash X sometimes with powernow-k8
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `linux-2.6'.
>
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18-8
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After building kernel 2.6.18 with make-kpkg I get the following error
when installing:
dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.18.061216_2.6.18.061216-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
Selecting previously desele
FYI: The status of the mkvmlinuz source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 27
Current version: 29
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
To UNS
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:11:30AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-17 02:52]:
> > I just saw the discussion on #394392 mm/msync issue... this may be the
> > same thing presumably strace changes the timing...
>
> Yes, I just wanted to ask you wh
Hi,
got this 'failed to execute /init' message on boot -
altering /initrd.img to point to /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-18-1-amd64.bak
FAILS
renaming /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-18-1-amd64
to /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-18-1-amd64.pj
then
renaming /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-18-1-amd64.bak
to /boot/initrd.
Ooops, I accidentally used some bash specific syntax in the first patch. The
attached patch fixes this and should work now. It also makes sure the right
option is passed into parse_video_opts (was $TMP, should be $x)
--- framebuffer.orig 2006-11-14 06:54:08.0 +
+++ framebuffer.fixed
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85c
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The framebuffer script
(/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-top/framebuffer) assumes that the
name of the option on the command line is the same as the name of the module
for the framebuffer. This is not correct for Matrox c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notforwarded 402475
Bug#402475: Debian bcm43xx freezes the system
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18530.
> forwarded 402745 https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18530
Bug#402745: cvs T
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85c
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The file /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-top/framebuffer has invalid
syntax in parse_video_opts at line 47:
elif [ "$opt" != "${opt#[[:digit:]]*x[[:digit:]]}"; then
is lacking a closing ']'
Also thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 401187 + pending
Bug#401187: Areca driver (arcmsr) not included in Sid/Alpha
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 401187 pending
Bug#401187: Areca driver (arcmsr) not included in Sid/Alpha
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 391867 pending
Bug#391867: "port is slow to respond" on computer with SATA disk
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391867 + pending
Bug#391867: "port is slow to respond" on computer with SATA disk
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:15:47 +0300
Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:29:48AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Here is link to discussion:
> > > > > > > > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=116227512
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 403630 linux-2.6
Bug#403630: installationreport etch
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 403630 Hangs while detecting CD-ROM devices
Bug#403630: installationreport etch
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stop
reassign 403630 linux-2.6
retitle 403630 Hangs while detecting CD-ROM devices
thanks
On Monday 18 December 2006 16:23, Hubert Krause wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> There is one internal networkcontroller, that was not detected during
> install.
Your controller
00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: nVidia Corpora
On 12/17/06, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* David Lazar wrote:
> Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version
> 2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620.
Could you please try if the kernel from
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/linux-2.6/i386/
fixes this problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:09:09PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I believe that maintaining yaird separately from debian-kernel helps
>> avoid interest conflicts.
>
> Well, this is where you are wrong, there is no conclict of
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686
Version: 2.6.18-7
Severity: important
The system seems to freeze quite randomly. The only way out is a hard reset.
Everything works perfectly under 2.6.16 kernels, however in those versions the
JMB361
driver is disabled because of "outstanding" problems.
I am c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 394392
Bug#394392: msync() in recent kernels fails LSB
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:09:09PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > BTW, jonas, i notice also :
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403203
>
> Yes. I was slightly baffled about that bugreport fork,
Is there some easy way I can reproduce this? Format a disk with LUKS
on one PC, connect it to the slug and do what exactly to trigger the
corruption?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
> BTW, jonas, i notice also :
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403203
Yes. I was slightly baffled about that bugreport fork, and is still
wondering what to do about it: To me is seems like a report against the
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:31:22AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> And Bastian is decidetly anti make-kpkg and wants to remove all
> make-kpkg use from linux-2.6 as stated several times now. You can see
> beginings of that in the xen kernels.
That happens if the same problems happens over and
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:47:56AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:31:22AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Well, the real problem is that Manoj could be part of the kernel team,
> > > and to
> > > a point even is, since he
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:31:22AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, the real problem is that Manoj could be part of the kernel team, and
> > to
> > a point even is, since he has svn access to the repo.
> >
> > But there is a problem, in that Ma
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:40:16PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >From personal experience I must say that bugs reported against
>> kernel-package get manojs attention fast and get fixed fast.
>>
>> Bugs against the linux-2.6 source get ignored or
29 matches
Mail list logo