On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:49PM -0600, Keith Parkansky wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:19:51AM -0600, Keith Parkansky wrote:
> >>FYI
> >>The new Debian Installer using the
> >>2.6.17 kernel does NOT fix the
> >>CD drive problem that is covered
> >>by bug 387767. I just
Hallo,
is there any chance of fixing this before stable release? Or is it able
to force installer somehow to detect the NIC?
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:30:28AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:50:04 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> >> Manoj's principal preocupacion is those user who build their own
> >> kernel, and the official kernel is only an afte
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:50:04 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>> Manoj's principal preocupacion is those user who build their own
>> kernel, and the official kernel is only an after thought
This is a egregious mischaracterization of my stance.
> In
Hi,
I'm having similar problems with the sky2 driver. We've been avoiding
the builtin drivers from the packaged kernels in stable for a while,
but we're now using the backports (2.6.17 from backports.org), and we
(unvoluntarly) have started using the sky2 module. Traffic on the NIC
is usually low,
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:01:07 -0800
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't remember anyone reporting problems with xorg on these
> machines, it would be very valuable information if you could try it
> and report back.
Ok, thanks; I did, and xorg is working fine. You have to set
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge6
Severity: important
I encountered the following problem today:
Dec 17 12:10:02 erst kernel: kernel BUG at mm/memory.c:1609!
Dec 17 12:10:02 erst kernel: invalid operand: [#1]
Dec 17 12:10:02 erst kernel: PREEMPT SMP
Dec 17 12:10:
On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 11:30 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:13:53PM +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> > Hi Jurij,
> >
> > Did you get around to building the mini-iso image? I'm happy to test
> > when you have it ready.
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Sorry for the delay. The mini.iso
Hi,
Another thing I noticed with this bug is that when the eject fails (that
is, if one waits around a few minutes before trying to eject), I get
this in dmesg:
usb 1-4: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 6
while if I disconnect right away, and eject succeeds, nothing is prin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 403475 linux-2.6
Bug#403475: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7 lacks grub as dependancy
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 403479 linux-2.6
Bug#403479: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7 lack
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-17 02:52]:
> I just saw the discussion on #394392 mm/msync issue... this may be the
> same thing presumably strace changes the timing...
Yes, I just wanted to ask you whether you can try to downgrade to
http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2006/11
Package: linux-image
Version: 2.6.18-3-k7
If i try to install linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7 without grub installed then the
installation reports an error because the package tryes to execute the script
grub-update. I think if the kernel package executes that script always then
grub must be a dependan
Package: linux-image
Version: 2.6.18-3-k7
The package don't have the tda9887.ko module. There is no advice in any
changelog from that package and in previous versions of the package the
module was there.
--
By
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Hi bugs
I've just come across this too. It is a regression between
2.6.18-1-686 and 2.6.18-3-686 in unstable.
With 2.6.18-3-686 I get errors on loading raw1394 (and hence further
errors when loading video1394). Running gscanbus or attempting to
access /dev/video1394 causes a full kernel panic. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Luther wrote:
> Manoj's principal preocupacion is those user who build their own
> kernel, and the official kernel is only an after thought
In my understanding kernel-package is intended as a _generic_ tool for
Debian-packaging a Linux kernel, o
Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 02:19:51AM -0600, Keith Parkansky wrote:
FYI
The new Debian Installer using the
2.6.17 kernel does NOT fix the
CD drive problem that is covered
by bug 387767. I just downloaded
the Net Install image and tried to
install from it and had the same
problem
I still have problems with this bug, using 2.6.18-3.686.
The only new information I have is that if I eject it a very short time
after connecting it, it works fine. After a few minutes, the same error:
eject: unable to eject, last error: No such device
shows up, regardless of one trying to eject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 388350 =
Bug#388350: Add USB eject patch from Ubuntu
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Package: linux-support-2.6.18-3
Version: 2.6.18-8
Severity: minor
> Package: linux-support-2.6.18-3
> Source: linux-2.6
> Description: Support files for Linux 2.6.18
> This package provides support files for the Linux kernel build.
After reading this, I still don't know what the package does. Co
>> I just got one more non fatal Oops yesterday (see below) with
>> linux-image-2.6.18-3-amd64. I did not shut down the box, and I am still
>> running it.
>
>You do use AppleTalk, right?
Yes. At least, I have it installed and I am connected to a network with
Appletalk nodes.
>Do you use AppleTa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francesco Potorti` wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: normal
>>> 2.6.15 was removed long ago. Please test with 2.6.18 from sid (the
>>> kernel planned for etch). If you can still reproduce this,
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-rc1-mm1/broken-out/alpha-increase-percpu_enough_room.patch
>
> It's on my TODO list for this weekend.
This patch gets us back to the Relocation overflow problem, which was
also reported by James And
Hi,
On Saturday 16 December 2006 15:04, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
> > which version of the patch is it? >2.0.2.2-rc6 and <2.0.2.2-rc9 has
> > a critical bug which causes kernel oops if there is other traffic
> > while restarting vservers.
> http://svn.debian.
Hi Waldi,
On Sunday 17 December 2006 00:41, you wrote:
> severity 403405 important
I believe the RMs want this issue marked as important to be able to track
it...
> Such an output is quite clear with suspended devices:
> > ieee1394: Node suspended: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[8565af81]
Can
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:29:48AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Here is link to discussion:
> > > > > > > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=116227512815783&w=2
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > can you try the lin
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge5_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge5.dsc
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge5.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge5_all.deb
kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge5_all.deb
ke
kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27_2.4.27-10sarge5_powerpc.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-10sarge5_powerpc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-10sarge5_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.4.27-apus_2.4.27-10sarge5_powerpc.deb
kernel-build
kernel-patch-2.4.27-mips_2.4.27-10.sarge4.040815-2_i386+source.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mips-tools_2.4.27-10.sarge4.040815-2_i386.deb
kernel-patch-2.4.27-mips_2.4.27-10.sarge4.040815-2.tar.gz
kernel-patch-2.4.27-mips_2.4.27-10.sarge4.040815-2.dsc
Gree
kernel-image-2.4.27-ia64_2.4.27-10sarge5_ia64+source.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4-mckinley_2.4.27-10sarge5_ia64.deb
kernel-image-2.4-mckinley-smp_2.4.27-10sarge5_ia64.deb
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-mckinley_2.4.27-10sarge5_ia64.deb
kernel-hea
kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc_2.4.27-9sarge5_sparc+source.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-sparc32_2.4.27-9sarge5_sparc.deb
kernel-build-2.4.27-3_2.4.27-9sarge5_sparc.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3-sparc32_2.4.27-9sarge5_sparc.deb
kernel-image
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-10sarge5_alpha+source.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3-smp_2.4.27-10sarge5_alpha.deb
kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-10sarge5.tar.gz
kernel-build-2.4.27-3_2.4.27-10sarge5_alpha.deb
kernel-image-2.4.27
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-10sarge5_i386+source.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-headers-2.4.27-3-686-smp_2.4.27-10sarge5_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-386_2.4.27-10sarge5_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.4.27-3-686-smp_2.4.27-10sarge5_i386.deb
kernel-im
Hi Sven,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:36PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Why is loop-aes not part of the official module packages ?
Mostly because we have not yet found the time to complete the
integration. Note that the package uses linux-support-$KVERS, so
it is already easy to rebuild for ABI
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might
> > > be a
Hi all,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might
> > be adaptable, the PAE migration of i386 Xen is not. But we need this
> > chan
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:32:54PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot=20
> > wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
> > discuss them.
> The 2.6.18.6 stable series
Hi Frederik,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
> version, with the following changes:
> 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
> 2. new Xen patch
> 3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, breaks ABI
> 4. a
* David Lazar wrote:
> Same problem here, running linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 (version
> 2.6.18-7) on a Dell Optiplex GX620.
Could you please try if the kernel from
http://people.debian.org/~nobse/kernel/linux-2.6/i386/
fixes this problem? If it works for you, I'm going to add this patch
to 2.6.18-
38 matches
Mail list logo
