Jurij Smakov a écrit :
Hi Joel,
Hello Jurij,
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the behavior you are describing. I have a
SS20 box, running sid with Debian's linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
(version 2.6.18-6) kernel:
I don't try with debian package, only with official linux kernel. I
have te
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 310982 + pending
Bug#310982: smbmount does not honor uid and gid options with 2.4 kernel
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 338404 + pending
Bug#338404: initramfs-tools: /dev/[tp]ty[a-ep-z][0-9a-f] are created. This
wastes time and RAM and does no good.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Hi Joel,
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the behavior you are describing. I have a
SS20 box, running sid with Debian's linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
(version 2.6.18-6) kernel:
debian:~# uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.18-3-sparc32 #1 Fri Nov 24 16:10:16 GMT 2006 sparc GNU/Linux
debian:~# cat /proc/version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 400372 unreproducible
Bug#400372: dpkg randomly craches on Sparc32 running HyperSPARC processor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping pro
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2006 23:40:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2006 23:19:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no feedback, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 338404 linux-2.6
Bug#338404: initramfs-tools: /dev/[tp]ty[a-ep-z][0-9a-f] are created. This
wastes time and RAM and does no good.
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 364421 linux-2.6
Bug#364421: touch /var/run/new-
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2006 23:03:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel 2.6.12 is out long ago so this bug is fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400752 moreinfo
Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper
Tags were: moreinfo patch
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Saturday 02 December 2006 21:09, Frans Pop wrote:
> Since d-i switched to 2.6.18 I'm seeing significant delays during boot
> of the installer in two places.
Maks asked me to check if the same delays also happen on the laptop
itself. I've checked this using the same 2.6.18-3-486 kernel, and the
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:58:18PM +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> I've tried this and it seems to be a non-starter. It works fine when I
> use it on the modprobe commandline
>
> pingu:/sys/module/dmfe# modprobe dmfe disable=1
> dmfe: driver disabled, aborting initialization.
>
> but when I boo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 397460 + pending
Bug#397460: sunhme driver not working in 2.6.18
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
FYI: The status of the ipw3945d source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.7.22-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more inform
On Sunday 03 December 2006 23:58, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> but when I boot with dmfe.disable=1 on the commandline the driver gets
> loaded.
>
> pingu:/sys/module/dmfe# cat /proc/cmdline
> root=/dev/hda7 ro dmfe.disable=1
The dmfe.disable=1 construct was intended for use with the installer which
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 03 December 2006 22:34, dean gaudet wrote:
> > the linux-image .postrm script is (through some mechanism) invoking
> > /sbin/update-grub.
> >
> > /sbin/update-grub gives a warning now:
> >
> > You shouldn't call /sbin/update-grub. Please call /usr
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 21:29 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The issue of dmfe and tulip drivers advertising support for the cards
> with the same PCI IDs has popped up recently again [0]. As some of the
> cards work with dmfe driver (mostly on x86), and some work with tulip
> (on sparc Net
On Sunday 03 December 2006 22:34, dean gaudet wrote:
> the linux-image .postrm script is (through some mechanism) invoking
> /sbin/update-grub.
>
> /sbin/update-grub gives a warning now:
>
> You shouldn't call /sbin/update-grub. Please call /usr/sbin/update-grub
> instead!
>
> except that warning i
the linux-image .postrm script is (through some mechanism) invoking
/sbin/update-grub.
/sbin/update-grub gives a warning now:
You shouldn't call /sbin/update-grub. Please call /usr/sbin/update-grub instead!
except that warning is sent on stdout.
stdout in the .postrm script is hooked up throug
The exact same problem arises with version 2.6.18-6 of the linux-2.6 package.
The problem is really easy to reproduce: Just use the kernel in a XEN
environment, pass-through some PCI devices (here: NICs and USB Controller)
and put a bit of load onto them.
pgpbvpAwlcmHT.pgp
Description: PGP si
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 398251 2.6.18-6
Bug#398251: Oopses in domUs with pass-through PCI devices
Bug marked as found in version 2.6.18-6.
> severity 398251 important
Bug#398251: Oopses in domUs with pass-through PCI devices
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 400372 linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
Bug#400372: dpkg randomly craches on Sparc32 running HyperSPARC processor
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 04:40:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hda: max request size: 128KiB
> hda: Host Protected Area detected.
> current capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB)
> native capacity is 78165361 sectors (40020 MB)
So it reports a size larger than the real size. This really loo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 401439 important
Bug#401439: linux-image-2.6.17-2-parisc: XFS module will not load
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> reassign 401439 linux-2.6
Bug#401439: linux-image-2.6.17-2-parisc: XFS module will not load
Bug reassigned from pa
severity 401439 important
reassign 401439 linux-2.6
tags 401439 moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 08:20:26AM -0700, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-parisc
> Version: 2.6.17-9
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
No, it does not.
> The following
Hi Debian kernel team,
would you please tag this bug as WONTFIX, so that it does not get
included in bug squashes anymore?
Thanks,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>As it does not happen with other disks and the kernel don't specialcase
>disk types, it is rather likely a bug in this disk type. Is the
>mentioned sector within the sector count of the disk?
I've sent this message two times and it doesn't appear in the list, I send
it again:
Yes, this sector ap
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-parisc
Version: 2.6.17-9
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The following error is returned when attemtping to load the xfs module:
FATAL: Error inserting xfs (/lib/modules/2.6.17-2-parisc/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko):
Invalid module format
dmesg rev
An agreement would be significant as it will.
It is one of the largest Canadian discussion board websites.
In May, Paul Rogers and i will be teaching Scripting for Testers again
at STAR East in Florida. The Scottish Rite Theatre. But there is one
thing about it that really bugs me. I was attracted
Hi,
this is (was) a well known bug in dm-crypt; numerous people have
reported it.
It was just fixed by Christophe Saout. See
http://www.spinics.net/lists/dm-crypt/msg00481.html (message from
dm-crypt mailing list) for short description and patch.
Debian kernel package maintainers: Please ap
The missions differ from traditional air assaults or raids in that they
are not flying to a specific target. One such browser is GreenBrowser.
If you want to perform "severe or unusual intrusions, either physical or
psychological, on human subjects," you're going to need approval from
the Under Se
A black and white negative is made from the original positive slide and
sandwiched together with it for printing. by Hugh McKellar, commenting
on Delphi Group's recent survey and white paper on innovation.
In many cases, KM and human resources leaders can work closely with CIOs
to put in place dat
I see this also on AMD K6 system, ALI chipset (I don't have the precise
details handy, will dig them out if required).
I was able to work around the problem by using the "clocksource=tsc"
command line parameter.
The dmesg for 2.6.16 (which worked fine) contained:
PM-Timer running
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:32:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385574: Dom0 crashes with linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:29:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2006 10:31:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385397: linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686 failes to boot dom0
under xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
36 matches
Mail list logo
