I was having the same problem under 2.6.17-2-xen-k7 as reported by
Markus Ingalsuo.
I have upgraded all xen packages to the unstable versions (using
hypervisor 3.0.3 not 3.0-unstable), and I can now run two XenU at the
same time:
# xm list
Name ID Mem(MiB) VC
yep, this worked for me too, on:
linux-image-2.6.17-2-vserver-686
asus p3b-f, pentium iii 500 mhz
cheers,
--
Naveen Goswamy
pub 1024D/6C240D73 2004/10/21 navz at dreaming.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = CAE2 7531 7226 727E 1716 CFE1 9152 6A45 6C24 0D73
keyserver.net, pgpkey
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 01:56:28PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.18-4
> Severity: serious
> -- snipp alpha
> CC arch/alpha/kernel/core_cia.o
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:250: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in
tags 397217 moreinfo
stop
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:13:01AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
> Version: 2.6.17+2
> Severity: minor
etch will release with 2.6.18, use that.
you can get it from unstable and it will install in etch just fine.
please try to reproduce with 2.6
Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
Version: 2.6.17+2
Severity: minor
Please reassign to correct package.
All I know is upon shutdown -h, the screen, just before the "Power down"
message, is left with lots of
1-1.1:1.0 cannot disable/reset/enable port 1(error=-108)
or something messages.
If we, before
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
forcemerge 397139 397207
stop and over
can you please look for duplicates, before reporting!
Hmm... For some strange reason http://bugs.debian.org/src:linux-2.6
redirects to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=linux-2.6;dist=unstable,
forcemerge 397139 397207
stop and over
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:11:03PM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.18
> Version: 2.6.18-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
can you please look for duplicates, before reporting!
> debian/patches/bu
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Version: 2.6.18-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
debian/patches/bugfix/copy-user-highpage.patch adds fourth argument to
copy_user_highpage(), but fails to update function call in mm/hugetlb.c
accordingly:
CC mm/hugetlb.o
mm/hugetl
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006, Chris Wright wrote:
> * maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > as a future datapoint the problematic patch is from 2.6.18.1:
> > [S390] user readable uninitialised kernel memory.
>
> This should fix that up, and is queued for next -stable.
>
> thanks,
> -chris
add
* maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> as a future datapoint the problematic patch is from 2.6.18.1:
> [S390] user readable uninitialised kernel memory.
This should fix that up, and is queued for next -stable.
thanks,
-chris
--
From: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[S390] user r
reopen 381677
found 381677 0.85a
stop
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 03:17:07PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:34:17AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Bug#381677: fixed in initra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 381677
Bug#381677: initramfs-tools: Temporary files and initramfs world-readable
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 3
Your message dated Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:19:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest upload built with newer kernel-package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:20:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linux-2.6: Please enable CONFIG_VSERVER_HARDCPU for vserver
flavour(s)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:19:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line latest upload built with newer kernel-package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Tags: fixed-upstream
thank you
I just downloaded and tried 2.6.18.2 with same .config and make-kpkg.
Seems to work fine.
--
TIA Johan Thelmén
Sweden Falun
> Could you please try the kernel from [0]? It incorporates the patch
> [1] (which is committed to debian-kernel svn), based on David Miller's
> patch [2] for this problem, and boots fine in qemu.
>
> [0]
> http://www.wooyd.org/debian/kernels/linux-image-2.6.18-1-sparc32_2.6.18-4_sparc.deb
Eve
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-4
Severity: serious
-- snipp alpha
CC arch/alpha/kernel/core_cia.o
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:250: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect
{standard input}:265: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in eff
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.18-2-footbridge_2.6.18-4_arm.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-2-footbridge_2.6.18-4_arm.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-2-iop32x_2.6.18-4_arm.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-2-iop32x_2.6.18-4_arm.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-2-ixp4xx_2.6.18-4
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 03:58:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392065: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 03:58:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395247: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 03:58:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392078: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 03:58:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394697: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-4_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-4_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-2-all-amd64_2.6.18
Dear kernel maintainers,
Just a quick update on this issue:
This is still present with 2.6.18-3.
I can reproduce this not only on amd64 but also on i386 (same hardware)
with the following kernels:
* 2.6.18-1-amd64 (amd64)
* 2.6.18-1-486 (i386)
* 2.6.18-1-k7(i386)
Other people seem to be g
25 matches
Mail list logo
