linux-2.6_2.6.18-4_arm.changes is NEW

2006-11-04 Thread Debian Installer
(new) linux-headers-2.6.18-2-footbridge_2.6.18-4_arm.deb optional devel Header files for Linux 2.6.18 on Footbridge based This package provides the architecture-specific kernel header files for Linux kernel 2.6.18 on Footbridge (CATS, Netwinder) machines, generally used for building out-of-tree

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.18-4_arm.changes

2006-11-04 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.18-4_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-headers-2.6.18-2_2.6.18-4_arm.deb linux-image-2.6.18-2-footbridge_2.6.18-4_arm.deb linux-headers-2.6.18-2-footbridge_2.6.18-4_arm.deb linux-image-2.6.18-2-iop32x_2.6.18-4_arm.deb linux-headers-2.

linux-2.6_2.6.18-4_amd64.changes is NEW

2006-11-04 Thread Debian Installer
linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.dsc linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-4_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-4_all.deb (new) linux-headers-2.6.18-2-all-amd64_2.6.18-4_am

Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.18-4_amd64.changes

2006-11-04 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.18-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.dsc linux-2.6_2.6.18-4.diff.gz linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-4_all.deb linux-manual-2.6.18_2.6.18-4_all.deb linux-patch-debian-2.6.18_2.6.18-4_all.deb linux-source-2.6.18_2.6.18-4_all.

Processed: severity of 394690 is important

2006-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22 > severity 394690 important Bug#394690: Current version causes system freeze on SATA attached cdrom at least Severity set to `important' from `grave' > End of message, stopping process

Re: s390 2.6.18.2 debian build failure

2006-11-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 03:24:03PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > hello, > > could you guys please look at the build failure: > -- snipp > AS arch/s390/lib/uaccess.o > CC lib/kernel_lock.o > LD drivers/s390/scsi/built-in.o > arch/s390/lib/uaccess.S: Assembler messages: > arch

RE: minimum initrd to satisfy init

2006-11-04 Thread Name Withheld
recap: kernel fails boot proccess at the point where /sbin/init 'should' execute, kernel panic, results. In a most excellent article by Richard Ferri in Linux Journal: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5465 it was explained that I needed to execute '/dev/MAKEDEV console' in the directory o

s390 2.6.18.2 debian build failure

2006-11-04 Thread maximilian attems
hello, could you guys please look at the build failure: -- snipp AS arch/s390/lib/uaccess.o CC lib/kernel_lock.o LD drivers/s390/scsi/built-in.o arch/s390/lib/uaccess.S: Assembler messages: arch/s390/lib/uaccess.S:44: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `lgr' arch/s390/lib/uaccess.S:47:

Re: General question about Debian Kernels

2006-11-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:17:53PM +0100, atanas.simeonov wrote: > Hello. > > I want to ask about the differences of the following kernel images: > > - linux-image-2.6-686 meta package which should keep your image pointing to latest 2.6 images > - kernel-image-2.6-686 transitional package for sar

General question about Debian Kernels

2006-11-04 Thread atanas.simeonov
Hello. I want to ask about the differences of the following kernel images: - linux-image-2.6-686 - kernel-image-2.6-686 - linux-image-xen-686 Where can I read more about those kernel images (what hardware they support e.t.c.)? I excuse for this questions, but I am a newbie and will learn mor

Bug#397016: adding rescue boot menu entry for backup initramfs

2006-11-04 Thread maximilian attems
Package: grub Version: 0.97-18 Severity: important latest initramfs-tools backups the booted initramfs in ${initrd}.bak it would be even cooler if update-grub would take care to add an rescue entry for the user, as the user might not be aware that in the case of an b0rked initramfs there is an bac

Re: initramfs-utils and LVM ?

2006-11-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:45:55AM +0100, Hadmut Danisch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:14:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > > > > The scripts that come with debian support (or at least supported at > > > that time) only encrypting the volumes inside an LVM separately. > > > > please

Re: initramfs-utils and LVM ?

2006-11-04 Thread Hadmut Danisch
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > i'm not interested in random assumptions, i tried to respond your > question on a technical level - you seem to be in pretty bad mood. Maybe because it is sometimes so difficult to get an answer to a question. As the subjec

Re: initramfs-utils and LVM ?

2006-11-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:58:10AM +0100, Hadmut Danisch wrote: > > I installed the notebooks around almost a year ago, and at that time > debian did not support such a method. I had some discussions with > maintainers at that time, and I assume that it was my proposal why it > is implemented in l

Bug#298972: mkvmlinuz: german debconf translation

2006-11-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hello, please find attached the german debconf translation for the mkvmlinuz package. Best Holger -- == Created with Sylpheed 2.2.2 under Debian GNU/LINUX 3.1 »Sarge« http://counter.li.org/, Registered LinuxUser #311290

Re: initramfs-utils and LVM ?

2006-11-04 Thread Hadmut Danisch
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:45:01AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: > > In fact, that is the setup that you'll get if you choose to do an > automated encrypted installation with current daily snapshots of > debian-installer (one small unencrypted /boot, one large luks-encrypted > partition with LVM

Re: initramfs-utils and LVM ?

2006-11-04 Thread Hadmut Danisch
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:14:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > > The scripts that come with debian support (or at least supported at > > that time) only encrypting the volumes inside an LVM separately. > > please explain what you mean by aboves sentence. > afaik cryptoroot on top of a lvm

Re: initramfs-utils and LVM ?

2006-11-04 Thread David Härdeman
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:14:04AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Fri, 03 Nov 2006, Hadmut Danisch wrote: Thanks for the hint. I was reading that skript when I wrote my own one. Unfortunately the initramfs hooks did not support what I was looking for. I was in contact with the luks package

Re: Minimum initrd to satisfy init

2006-11-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006, Name Withheld wrote: > Can anyone tell me, or point me towards something that will explain what > is the minimum I need to put into an initrd image to satisfy init and > complete the boot process? so i guess you are using initrd-tools it's support for nfs root is very limi

Re: initramfs-utils and LVM ?

2006-11-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006, Hadmut Danisch wrote: > Thanks for the hint. I was reading that skript when I wrote my own > one. Unfortunately the initramfs hooks did not support what I was > looking for. I was in contact with the luks package maintainers. > > The scripts that come with debian support (or

Bug#120116: george geisinger Detection

2006-11-04 Thread Bill Mayer
Good Morning george geisinger, After Checking our files, my company is willing to offer you upto 242K at 7.80% to 791K at 4.23% fixed. www.niewi.com/9r Submit your form & get your FICO file. Respects, Bill Mayer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: Mounting UFS under Linux with R/W

2006-11-04 Thread Oleg Verych
On 2006-11-04, Alien wrote: > > --=BoundaryHOT1162626664.65-- > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I did not seem to find this topic in this list - I hope it is the right > place to discuss that. > > > > The problem is  -  m