On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:18:33PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:04:26AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > What I propose for mkvmlinuz is:
> > >
> > > -fix the po-debconf thing in SVN
> > > -include the Swedish transl
Quoting Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:04:26AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > What I propose for mkvmlinuz is:
> >
> > -fix the po-debconf thing in SVN
> > -include the Swedish translation
> > -post a call for updates to -i18n with a 7-days delay
> > -commit all
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 396471 linux-2.6
Bug#396471: linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp: fails to install
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp' to `linux-2.6'.
> merge 396471 395110
Bug#395110: linux-2.6: cannot configure linux-image-2.6.18-1
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Nope, because you can ship the source code and the object file if you
> > wanted.
> >
> > Already now, major parts of debian/main are not cleanly buildable out
> >
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:59:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > This bug is closed by the new kernel-package version, and linux-2.6 only
> > needs
> > to be rebuilt with it, which is scheduled for -4, and amply discussed here
>
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
[...]
>> Adding amd64 as subarch to i386 would mean 3 additional flavors to
>> build, raising the overall build-time of that package by 1.5-2h.
>
> Which doesn't sound like a blocker to
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:50:19 +0100 Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Mathew
>
> (Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
Again assuming that this means you and Matthew want to be Cc:ed as
well...
[...]
> > That's perfectly acceptable. Upstream can do whatever they want.
> > However,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:21:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> This bug is closed by the new kernel-package version, and linux-2.6 only needs
> to be rebuilt with it, which is scheduled for -4, and amply discussed here
> previously.
Is linux-2.6 binNMU-safe? Could we binNMU linux-2.6 to fix this
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:30:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Can someone from the kernel team comment on whether there are problems with
> > this particular patch that have not yet been noted in the bug report? If
> > the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
> Nope, because you can ship the source code and the object file if you
> wanted.
>
> Already now, major parts of debian/main are not cleanly buildable out
> of the box, due to cyclic bootstraping dependencies.
But those major parts of
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 15:01]:
>> Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I asked this before and haven't yet recieved an answere:
>>
>> What does w-b do when the amd64 build uploads amd64+i386 64bit kernel
>> debs b
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think xen or vserver are the perfect environment to have both worlds
>> live on the same machine. :)
>
> Then try that and make sure the hypervisor has no 32/64 bit
> problems.
I use mixed environment on the company server. We have 32 and 64 b
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:54:09PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp
> Version: 2.6.18-3
> Severity: serious
>
> This issue has been reported several times before, but I've not yet seen
> any real response from the kernel team.
>
> Preconfiguring packages ...
>
Dear maintainer of mkvmlinuz and Debian translators,
On 31 oct 2006 I sent a notice to the maintainer of the mkvmlinuz Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation
update in the BTS (bug #298972).
I announced the intent to build and possibly upload a non-main
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 396458 debian-installer
Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `debian-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
reassign 396458 debian-installer
thanks
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:16:24PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> severity 396458 important
> tags 396458 patch
> thanks
>
> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 22:08, rob rob wrote:
> > While investigating that problem Benjamin Herrenschmidt sent this
> > interesting mai
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:06:50PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Sven
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:32:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> ...CUT...
> > > Will all reverse engineered drivers with hardcoded values be considered
> > > as closed source? Must you always release everything that you kn
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 17:31]:
>> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Andi
>> >
>>
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:26:38 + Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> (Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
Including the From: field (that is you) and the To: field (that is Ola
Lundqvist)? Let's assume the answer i
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp
Version: 2.6.18-3
Severity: serious
This issue has been reported several times before, but I've not yet seen
any real response from the kernel team.
Preconfiguring packages ...
Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-2.6.18-1-parisc64-smp.
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 396458 linux-2.6
Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.17-2-powerpc-miboot-di' to
`linux-2.6'.
> severity 396458 important
Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
Severity
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:26:28PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try
> >> building on m68k. :)
> >
> >
reassign 396458 linux-2.6
severity 396458 important
tags 396458 patch
thanks
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 22:08, rob rob wrote:
> While investigating that problem Benjamin Herrenschmidt sent this
> interesting mail with a patch, which may solve the problem:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2
Hi Sven
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:32:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
...CUT...
> > Will all reverse engineered drivers with hardcoded values be considered
> > as closed source? Must you always release everything that you know
> > when you release somehting as open source?
> > Must we release the i
Thanks Alexandre,
Do you have a poitner to where upstream was notified?
A description of the problem has been posted on the
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list, and to Phil Dibowitz
and Alan Stern, which are supposed to be the maintainers of the
usb-storage unusual device
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:09:28PM -0300, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
>
> >Thanks Alexandre,
> > Do you have a poitner to where upstream was notified?
> >
> >
> A description of the problem has been posted on the
> linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list, and to Phil Dibowitz and
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-686
Version: 2.6.18-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
upgrading 2.6.18-2 to 2.6.18-3 results in an unbootable system. Calling
lilo fixes it.
Jens
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:34:21PM -0300, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.18-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
>
> Linux 2.6.18 introduces a conservative change that restricts the UCR-61S2
> initialization fix to only a specific version of th
dann frazier escreveu:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:09:28PM -0300, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
Thanks Alexandre,
Do you have a poitner to where upstream was notified?
A description of the problem has been posted on the linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list, and to Phil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> tags 394697 pending
Bug#394697: linux-image-2.6.18-1-sparc32: oops in sysfs file open on boot, root
mount impossible
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, st
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
> As you say you need the prefered form of _modification_, which means
> that if we change things, we are not allowed to obfuscate it. I can not
> see anything that enfoce th
Package: initramfs-tools
Followup-For: Bug #395069
update-initramfs exits with code 1 during the update (-u) switch.
this causes failures installing every package that runs it in its
scripts (udev, linux-image-*, initramfs-tools...).
the error code is returned while executing run_bootloader().
Hi Goswin
Thanks for your response, and interesting new view (option C)
on this matter.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:20:44PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...CUT...
> > Let me take two examples:
> > * Person A create a driver by reverse engineering,
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7
Version: 2.6.18-3
Severity: important
Hello,
While doing a disk copy from NFS to JFS on a SATA drive (80G worth) I got this
kernel oops.
I have no USB storage devices present, although I have a USB multi-card reader
without any card inserted.
Nothing critical
Could you please try the kernel from [0]? It incorporates the patch
[1] (which is committed to debian-kernel svn), based on David Miller's
patch [2] for this problem, and boots fine in qemu.
[0]
http://www.wooyd.org/debian/kernels/linux-image-2.6.18-1-sparc32_2.6.18-4_sparc.deb
This works on r
Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:30:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Can someone from the kernel team comment on whether there are problems with
>> this particular patch that have not yet been noted in the bug report? If
>> there aren't any
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge5
Severity: normal
In the process of attempting to use the ULOG iptables target and ulogd,
I found that there is a problem with the ipt_ULOG module preventing it
from actually working. Any time a ULOG target rule is reached, the
following mes
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:23:52 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375800: linux-image-2.6.17-1-vserver-amd64-k8: gdb freezes
system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> First I want to tell to you Kyle and Matthew, that this is not a personal
> thing against you, and that I have noted the question mark in the end of the
> subject ("Contains obfuscated source code, DFSG violation?"). I actually want
> to thank you
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:30:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Can someone from the kernel team comment on whether there are problems with
> this particular patch that have not yet been noted in the bug report? If
> there aren't any known objections, I could review the patch myself and
Hi Mathew
(Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 04:26:38PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:00:15PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> (Anyone on debian-legal: please note and maintain the Cc:s)
>
> > As you say you need the p
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 15:01]:
> Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I asked this before and haven't yet recieved an answere:
>
> What does w-b do when the amd64 build uploads amd64+i386 64bit kernel
> debs but not 32bit. Afaik the package should be detected
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 17:31]:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386?
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Andi
> >
> > The patch is in the BTS and quite small. About 5 li
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:36:03AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> I think it is right to ping the submitter, and give him, let's say a month or
> so to come back, before completely dismissing him. I have been doing so with
> the older powerpc bugs. And i got a reply or two if i remember well.
And mak
forwarded 396375
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=116230631107331&w=2
tag 396375 + upstream
stop
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:06:36PM -0300, Alexandre Pereira Nunes wrote:
> It seems like sourceforge archive is lagging behind.
No surprise there :(
> The post can be read here:
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 396375
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=116230631107331&w=2
Bug#396375: linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7: 2.6.18 breaks usb-storage for UCR-61S2
device
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://marc.theaimsgroup.c
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:52:13PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> The only thing is #2 above. The question is if someone must release
> all it knows when it release open source software (according to DFSG)
> or if you can release only enough to make something work. I can also
> put it as if you want
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.84
Severity: normal
mkinitramfs is not a set -x script, and so when call_scripts runs a hook
script, any error is ignored.
In some cases, a hook script needs to abort the initramfs build. For
example, then nslu2-tools hook script can detect issues, like a missi
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, you are probably right if the person use an automated tool to make
> this obfuscation. (Not sure though, see below).
>
> However as it is impossible to know if someone use a obfuscation program
> or if the person use a text editor to edit this, I can
This a known bug and is already fixed in the current git tree. AFAIK the patch
is accepted for 2.6.18.2. If you need it earlier, here it is:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d9f7a745d55527d0d41684b22506a86c4381f7f1
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:15:54AM
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-k7
Version: 2.6.18-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Linux 2.6.18 introduces a conservative change that restricts the UCR-61S2
initialization fix to only a specific version of the firmware, but older
versions needs that as well. The supplied patch reverses that behav
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:30:57PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386?
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Andi
> >
> > The patch is in the BTS and quite sma
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:19:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395907: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.85
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try
>> building on m68k. :)
>
> Ask cts, it takes less. Especialy as m68k currently builds only two
> images.
>
> B
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:19:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394559: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.85
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:19:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393906: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.85
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On 2006-10-31, maximilian attems wrote:
[]
>> May i ask, what is general rules to accept changes?
> you didn't look at the wiki heh
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
Thanks.
>> For example .19-rc linux kernel has some valuable cha
On 2006-10-30, Adrian Johnson wrote:
[]
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.18-4~snapshot.7648
>
> I have experienced a network freeze of the sky2 network driver
> The console error message is:
> NETDEV WATCHDOG : eth0: transmit timed out
> sky2 eth0: tx timeout
> sky2 hardwa
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.85.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.85.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.85.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.85.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.85_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.85_all.deb
Override entries for yo
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:29:21PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I personally have somewhat lost the overview on on open issues being
> busy with RL work the past 2 weeks, so I would like everyone of you to
> compile a short list of things you have on your agenda for 2.6.18-4,
> and generally
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andi
>
> The patch is in the BTS and quite small. About 5 lines of code change
> and the obvious ton of .config files.
Replying to myse
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:19:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393890: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.85
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:19:44 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393890: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.85
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
initramfs-tools_0.85_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.85.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.85.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.85_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Am Montag, den 30.10.2006, 14:38 +0100 schrieb maximilian attems:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:42:25AM +0100, Thomas Maier wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > thought nobody's going to look at this, it's almost a year :).
>
> swsusp bugs are low priority and there is still lots of work going
> on upst
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Frederik Schueler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061030 16:30]:
>> Fellow kernel-team members,
>>
>> it has been a while since our last upload, and the issues are
>> cumulating. We have a total of 8 RC bugs we need to take care before the
>> release, and anothe
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try
> building on m68k. :)
Ask cts, it takes less. Especialy as m68k currently builds only two
images.
Bastian
--
I have never understood the female capacity
Hi David,
Sorry for the slow response; since I quitted my previous job,
it's a bit more difficult to get physical access to the computer in question.
(On the other hand, I don't really care about it any more.)
Anyway, I tested it with 2.6.18-3, and without acpi=off, the system is still
screwed up
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Oleg Verych wrote:
> Hallo, Frederik.
>
> On 2006-10-10, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> []
> >
> > As usual, if someone needs more time for pending changes, drop a line.
>
> May i ask, what is general rules to accept changes?
you didn't look at the wiki heh
http://wiki.debian.or
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> - the ext3 corruption (#392818)
fixed in 2.6.18.1
jan kara's patch fixes this issue that showed up on 1k bs
and stress testing with fsx.
i'll close the bug later.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
could you please have a look at this bug?
thanks
- Forwarded message from Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bug#395247: [s390] System clock runs wild (in hercules emulator)
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:31:5
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:44:25PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> I'm installing it right now, although package is called 2.6.18-1, but
> actual version is 2.6.18-3, so if it was based on 2.6.18.2+ then bug
> should be fixed. I will add more details if this situation appeares
> again, since I
Done, the mkvmlinuz is in kernel/trunk/utils/mkvmlinuz.
I would prefer to have added bubulle though, i don't know where your blog is,
but i guess this would be an alioth bug, no ?
No, this is a glibc bug (32 groups limit in some conditions) in sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> just a small reminder that etch still has no 64bit kernels for
> i386. This is a regression from sarge which has them. The bug
> (#379090) has a simple patch to reintroduce those kernel images (+5/-1
> lines code change and th
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:57:16AM +0100, maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:30:30AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
> > Version: 2.6.17-9
> > Followup-For: Bug #396185
> >
> > Bug was filled against 2.6.17-9, but was fix
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:30:55PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:57:16AM +0100, maximilian attems ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:30:30AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
> > > Version: 2.6.17-9
> > > F
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:34:55AM +0100, maximilian attems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:30:55PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:57:16AM +0100, maximilian attems ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:30:30AM +0300,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:04:26AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> What I propose for mkvmlinuz is:
>
> -fix the po-debconf thing in SVN
> -include the Swedish translation
> -post a call for updates to -i18n with a 7-days delay
> -commit all received updates (I'll receive them directly as this i
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:30:30AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
> Version: 2.6.17-9
> Followup-For: Bug #396185
>
> Bug was filled against 2.6.17-9, but was fixed in recent git (2.6.19-rc3),
> probably also
> fixed in 2.6.18.1
>
> Here is link to discussion:
close. Its working
ata1.00: ATA-6, max UDMA/133, 156312576 sectors: LBA
ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 16
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD800JD-08JN Rev: 06.0
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05
ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170
Sven Luther a écrit :
The mkvmlinuz Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
longstanding bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf. At least one of these is older than 100 days, namely
bug number 298972 (it is pretty likely that several other translat
81 matches
Mail list logo
