On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:37:18PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to propose an IRC meeting for all kernel team members, to
> discuss where we stand and what we want to do in the future, concerning
> kernel firmwares.
>
> The meeting should take place in #debian-kernel on irc.deb
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.17-9
Severity: important
Kernel can't found driver for Corega Gigabit Network card.
This card have RTL-8169 chip and r8169.ko make good.
Cause of this trouble is r8169.c have not PCI Vender ID.
Please include next PCI Vender ID to r8169.c .
--- linux-source-2.6.17/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388815 upstream
Bug#388815: linux-2.6: [sparc] /proc/fb cannot be read in some cases
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> forwarded 388815 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7189
Bug#388815: linux-2.6: [sparc] /proc/fb cannot be
Maks, this problem is the one we spoke about.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
- Forwarded message from Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Re: iMac G5 fan control in 2.6.16 vs 2.6.17
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alexander McLeay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: deb
FYI: The status of the linux-latest-2.6 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.2
Current version: 2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.79
Current version: 0.80
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:38:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388839: dom0 crashes and reboots machine when domU is
started.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.17-2-xen-686
Version: 2.6.17-9
I have a testing (Etch) system up to date as of today. I installed
ii libc6-xen 2.3.6.ds1-4
ii linux-image-2.6.17-2-xen-686 2.6.17-9
ii linux-modules-2.6.17-2-xen-686 2.6.17-9
ii xen-docs-3.0-unsta
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:34:21PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > That is, why depends PPC is wrong, it needs to depend on the proper
> > option like PPC_MULTIPLATFORM.
> I believe PPC_MULTIPLATEFORM was already present in arch=ppc tre
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:10:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:04:04PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > No, it fails for prep.
> > Oh, ok, normal then, prep is not arch=powerpc, but arch=ppc, and thus it
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:10:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:04:04PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > No, it fails for prep.
> Oh, ok, normal then, prep is not arch=powerpc, but arch=ppc, and thus it has
> probably never been tested there, what is more, aoa is a driver f
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 10:04:04PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:58:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It seems it only fails to build on powerpc64, not sure, maybe we should for
> > now disable it on 64bit flavours ?
>
> No, it fails for prep.
Oh, ok, normal then, prep
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:58:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> It seems it only fails to build on powerpc64, not sure, maybe we should for
> now disable it on 64bit flavours ?
No, it fails for prep.
Bastian
--
Violence in reality is quite different from theory.
-- Spock, "The Cl
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:39:09PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:29:41PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> [...]
>
> Hmm, SND_AOA depends on PPC not PPC_MULTIPLATFORM.
It seems it only fails to build on powerpc64, not sure, maybe we should for
now disable it on 64bit flavou
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 388815 !
Bug#388815: linux-2.6: [sparc] /proc/fb cannot be read in some cases
Changed Bug submitter from Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Frans Pop <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.17-9
Severity: normal
$ cat /proc/fb
0 ATY Mach64
$ od -cx /proc/fb
000 0 A T Y M a c h 6 4 \n \0
3020 4154 5920 4d61 6368 3634 0a00
015
So /proc/fb actually does contain data, but:
$ grep "ATY" /proc/fb
$ echo $?
1
$ e
Hi,
Branden has re ceieevi ed your filled app.
Adan shall then Re-confirm yo ur data .
http://ECEF91.ssr.be
For mark millich
and your Cr. R ating is not an iss ue.
All H0m e Equ! tytypes have been aproved for you mark
millich
Thanks,
Evangelina
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Package: initramfs-tools
Followup-For: Bug #387808
found 387808 0.80
thanks
i don't know what i was smoking.
as best i can tell, this wasn't a problem in 0.79, and the patch i filed
in this bug report actually *caused* the problem, rather than solving
it.
i suspect there may be some situations i
Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:07:41 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line compiled in?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Package: initramfs-tools
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Followup-For: Bug #387808
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> found 387808 0.80
Bug#387808: initramfs-tools: scripts/nfs doesn't properly handle when server
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:46:06AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> The ia64/xen folks here think so too - I'm not too familiar with Xen,
> but if you want to enable ia64/xen in linux-2.6 I should be able to
> get help from HP people if we run into ia64-specific problems.
The question is, do we want/c
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:42:18PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Hi Kyle
>
> Can we set the compiler for hppa to 4.1?
>
Yes, I've been using it to build non-debian kernels for a while.
(PS: I'd like to set up a kernel buildd for hppa, is there a list
of instructions for doing so?)
Cheers,
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-amd64
Version: 2.6.17-9
The module "amd64-agp.ko" is missing. It goes in:
lib/modules/2.6.17-2-amd64/kernel/drivers/char/agp/
Thanks,
-s
p.s., I think you'll find it is in the 686 package for some odd
reason...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:51:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Xen should be okay. According to the maintainer of this tree, ia64
> should work fine also.
The ia64/xen folks here think so too - I'm not too familiar with Xen,
but if you want to enable ia64/xen in linux-2.6 I should be able to
get
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> The architectures taking part in the snapshot buildd network (amd64 i386
> powerpc s390 sparc) should be in a releasable state, while for the
> others, the build system has been changed to not fail if missing options
> are not s
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6.16
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #386972
# * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7159
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usert
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > And exactly this is what it is all about: find a way to satisfy BOTH
> > priorities, not just one.
>
> No. It is about the definition of "our users".
>
> If "our users" are dependent on non-free software, then we indir
Arrgh!
Please ignore my post a moment ago. In a moment of carelessness I
forgot my promise of throwing no more flames in this thread :-(
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eo
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:16:02 +0200 Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I honestly believe that moving linux-2.6 to non-free hurts our users
> > more than stripping non-free parts of the Debian-precompiled kernel.
>
> of course.
>
> >
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:25:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [Dropping -release from cc anyway; there's no possible reason this needs to
> be cross-posted to 4 lists]
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:12:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:58:31AM -0500, Bill Allombert
On Thursday 21 September 2006 19:01, Frans Pop wrote:
> It will only hit the mirrors tonight or maybe even tomorrow (not sure).
> I will try to run an installation test tomorrow to see if 2.6.17 is
> picked up correctly.
Tested and OK.
pgpXfXfeuHqTH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I would like to propose an IRC meeting for all kernel team members, to
discuss where we stand and what we want to do in the future, concerning
kernel firmwares.
The meeting should take place in #debian-kernel on irc.debian.org on
Saturday, 30th September 16:00 UTC
Topic:
1. Find a co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388727 linux-modules-extra-2.6
Bug#388727: squashfs-module: Kernel module source apprently for 2.6.18
Warning: Unknown package 'squashfs-module'
Bug reassigned from package `squashfs-module' to `linux-modules-extra-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processi
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:40:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:21:12 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > This issue remains, and it is still not solved. This has got the
> > approval of Steve Langasek (who said that his proposal and this
> > where
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I honestly believe that moving linux-2.6 to non-free hurts our users
> more than stripping non-free parts of the Debian-precompiled kernel.
of course.
> Also, section 4 of the SC talks equally about users and free softwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:58:14 +0200 Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:16:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:38:50PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > Second: this release contains ALL binary firmwar
Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686
Version: 2.6.16-18
According to the package description on packages.debian.org the package
should contain the version.h file:
usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686/include/linux/version.h
But is doesn't!
Is that a bug in the package, the documentation or in m
37 matches
Mail list logo
