Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
Version: 2.6.17-6
Severity: minor
It seems unfortunate that the package description doesn't mention that you no
longer need a -smp kernel to support hyperthreading. I'd deferred upgrading
for some time because I was waiting for a package I no longer need. The 68
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 384083 linux-2.6
Bug#384083: linux kernel 686 gives 'XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf'
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Package: linux-image
Version: 2.6.17-2-686
# uname -a
Linux cronos 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 11 20:25:51 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
I've got the following message:
xfs_da_do_buf: bno 16777216
dir: inode 9179482
Filesystem "hda7": XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(1) at line 2119 of
file fs/xfs/xfs
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:01:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Support for 2.4 kernels is being dropped
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:12:33PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> AGP_INTEL is on by default for x86_64 in the current 2.6 Linux kernels.
Closing then, thanks Nathanael.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:01:14 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298099: Bug appears fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
On Monday 21 August 2006 23:50, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Since pre-2.6 kernels won't be in the next version of Debian, this bug
> is no longer fixable (the affected code is totally gone). Closing now.
>
> If there is a similar bug in Linux 2.6, please file a new bug.
Please be a littl
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:55:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line PS/2 Mouse driver has changed substantially
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:10:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.4 is toast
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:55:14 +0200
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello ivan,
> i have lots of output from your side,
> but no conclusions about what is happening.
> also this bug report is heavy to parse,
> as many stuff is customized on your own LIST usage,
> where as you repor
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:03:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line PREEMPT will remain enabled
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:05:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.4 going away, closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respon
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:07:58 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid bug report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # These are wontfixes which are also FAQs
> reassign 259698 linux-2.6
Bug#259698: Could you also include a K6 image?
Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 272029 linux-2.6
Bug#272029: xbox: fatx fs support
Bug reassigned from
AGP_INTEL is on by default for x86_64 in the current 2.6 Linux kernels.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it.
So why isn't he in prison yet?...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:49:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.4 kernels going away, bug not present in 2.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:46:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is a fix to a dead part of the kernel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:49:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.4 kernels going away, bug not present in 2.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-2-686
Version: 2.6.17-6
Severity: normal
Wake on lan doesn't work with the tg3 driver. WOL was enabled with the ethtool,
and confirmed as on with the same tool. After shutdown the computer cannot be
woken (works fine when bcm5700 driver is used instead).
This is not a
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:42:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bootsplash can now be done with 'splashy'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
It would be nice if #381951 could be considered for inclusion.
Thanks,
FJP
pgp05Gtp9ZtT4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:05:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> > the next 2.6.17 upload, version 2.6.17-7 should become a candidate for
> > testing.
>
> > I would like to schedule the upload for Wednesday, Aug. 23.
>
> > a
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 12:28:38PM +0200, Bjoern Boschman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building my own kernel-* packages using:
>
> "make-kpkg buildpackage --initrd --rootcmd fakeroot --revision 03
> --append-to-version
> -sun-x4100-x4200"
>
> Afterwards my /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build symlink always
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 381844 unreproducible
Bug#381844: itramfs-tools doesn't produce working ramdisk on amd64 with
MODULES=list
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stop
hello ivan,
i have lots of output from your side,
but no conclusions about what is happening.
also this bug report is heavy to parse,
as many stuff is customized on your own LIST usage,
where as you report the bug against the default image.
also you seem to contradict the findings of initramfs.
Hi again.
Perpahps last mail was so long and very dificult to understand.
I will try to explain again with a small example.
1.- Create new hook for initramfs-tools
/etc/initramfs-tools/hooks/soundtest
#8<-
#!/bin/sh
PREREQ=""
prereqs()
{
echo "$PRERE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 384032 linux-image-2.6.17-2-amd64
Bug#384032: powernowd: Only scales down one core on dual-core opteron 285
Bug reassigned from package `powernowd' to `linux-image-2.6.17-2-amd64'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:40:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384043: initramfs-tools: hook manual_add_modules don't
copy/link some kernel modules
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 382043 kernel-package
Bug#382043: Typo in latest kernel package (2.6.17.8)
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `kernel-package'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Hi Maks.
maximilian attems wrote:
>
> next time your report a bug, use reportbug as it provides usefull
> info.
Was more of a conceptual suggestion, so version seemed enough. :-)
>> incomplete '/conf/mdadm.conf' file for an initrd.
>
> this file is unused, it was only left per accident.
> than
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:19:28PM +0200, Alexander Achenbach wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.75
next time your report a bug, use reportbug as it provides usefull
info.
> Hi,
>
> the backwards-compatible support for mdadm in 'mkinitramfs' creates an
> incomplete '/conf/mdadm.conf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 342246 + pending
Bug#342246: [ia64 headers] arch/ia64/modules.lds: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 383620 + pending
Bug#383620: fn k
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 384061 binutils
Bug#384061: linux-source-2.6.17: 2.6.17-6 fails to compile on amd64
Bug reassigned from package `linux-source-2.6.17' to `binutils'.
> merge 384061 381720
Bu
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> And I have no idea about:
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus
> kernel-patch-2.4-fasttraks150
> kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity
> kernel-patch-2.4-lowlatency
>
> Can you please provide a complete list, or if the original list *was*
> complete, confirm that?
tun-source needs to be
* Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-21 18:02]:
> OBJCOPY arch/x86_64/boot/vmlinux.bin
> objcopy: arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/vmlinux: File format is ambiguous
> objcopy: Matching formats: elf32-i386 elf32-i386-freebsd
This is a binutils bug: #381720
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyriu
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.75
Hi,
the backwards-compatible support for mdadm in 'mkinitramfs' creates an
incomplete '/conf/mdadm.conf' file for an initrd.
It uses 'mdadm --examin --scan', which in newer versions of mdadm (eg
2.4.1-5bpo1, ie from backports.org, but I strongly assume that
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:57:43AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I'm sending a patch to include spca5xx on linux-modules-extra-2.6
>> > since it'll make our and security team lifes easier :-D
>> I and B
Package: linux-source-2.6.17
Version: 2.6.17-6
Severity: important
hello,
linux-source-2.6.17 2.6.17-5 and 2.6.17-6 both break to compile when i
use make-kpkg from kernel-package 10.053:
$ make-kpkg --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd --append-to-version -4-amd64-resivo
--revision 2.6.17-6 kernel_image
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:57:43AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm sending a patch to include spca5xx on linux-modules-extra-2.6
> > since it'll make our and security team lifes easier :-D
> I and Bastian talked at IRC about the patch and he propo
Spam test. Sorry for the noise.
pgph3H0NSncdh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I filed
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203248
for FC5. My drive is a Cyberdrive CW038D (they're currently being sold
for $17.99 with free shipping at pcdirect.com - too bad they don't work
properly). It seems to affect all of Cyberdrive's models. Above I
should have w
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.75
Severity: important
I'm working on a small thin client project based on initramfs called TCOS[1].
This is similar to pxes, but I copy my debian installed apps and libs
into initramfs and boot from network throught tftp.
In older version of initramfs-tools
Hi *,
I filed a similar bug in kernel's bugzilla (but apparently forgot to
mail here after I found the debian bug):
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6745
Unfortunately kernel developers don't seem to be interested in fixing
it... :-(
ciao
Christian
--
NP: Thumb - Remember
--
To UNS
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:15:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug is done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm sending a patch to include spca5xx on linux-modules-extra-2.6
> since it'll make our and security team lifes easier :-D
I and Bastian talked at IRC about the patch and he proposed some
fixes. Here goes the new patch:
Index: spca5xx/copyright
=
Hello,
I'm sending a patch to include spca5xx on linux-modules-extra-2.6
since it'll make our and security team lifes easier :-D
Please review and apply.
Index: spca5xx/copyright
===
--- spca5xx/copyright (revisão 0)
+++ spca5xx/co
Hello Dan,
I'll fix this for the next build - thanks for reporting it.
No changes on build 20060820
In the meantime it might be easiest for you to:
* grab
http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6.16/linux-image-2.6.16-2-itanium-smp_2.6.16-17_ia64.deb
* extract the contents som
On FC5, the same problem currently exists with cdrecord. I read
elsewhere that cdrdao would work, and upon testing it turns out that it
can write a blanked CD-RW, but it can't blank it. Attempting a minimal
blank returns a false success, but upon checking it's not blanked after
all. A full b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reopen 383486
Bug#383486: initramfs-tools fails to include DAC960.ko RAID controller module
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter
#include
* Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 07:03:52PM]:
> Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 01:07:34PM]:
> >> Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >>> #include
> >>> * Michael Biebl [Fri, Aug 18 2006, 10:26:53AM]:
> I suggest to revert to the old behaviour and make "
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 377228 linux-latest-2.6
Bug#377228: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8: package should depend on
linux-image-2.6-amd64-k8 (dist-upgrade troubles otherwise)
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8' to `linux-latest-2.6'.
> severity 37722
reassign 377228 linux-latest-2.6
severity 377228 important
retitle 377228 Should provide kernel-image packages for amd64 upgrades from
Sarge
thanks
It looks like linux-latest is currently missing pseudo kernel-image
packages to ensure an upgrade path from Sarge to Etch for AMD64.
Please add.
p
Hi,
I'm building my own kernel-* packages using:
"make-kpkg buildpackage --initrd --rootcmd fakeroot --revision 03
--append-to-version -sun-x4100-x4200"
Afterwards my /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build symlink always points to the
directory where I've build my packges (/usr/src/linux-2.6.17), but
53 matches
Mail list logo