On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 07:54:08AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 12:58:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Try hurt and angry instead.
>
> How about "annoying, childish and socially inept"? We all know your
Well, how about respect for sickness and death ?
> beef with Frans a
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 12:58:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Try hurt and angry instead.
How about "annoying, childish and socially inept"? We all know your
beef with Frans and Jonas, and bringing it up again over and over is
only hurting _YOUR_ reputation. You certainly don't want people to
rol
tags 380649 +patch
thanks
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.75
Followup-For: Bug #380649
the ip= option turned out to be the easiest one. attached are two patches
that implement:
root=/dev/nfs
nfsroot=[:][,]
ip=::
ip=""
ip="dhcp"
i didn't implement ip=rarp or ip=bootp, though i get t
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:26:32 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:25:53PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > I had a machine that was had a poorly supported sata_mv chipset;
> > dapper nor sarge w/ 2.6.15/2.6.16 images would install onto it. I
> > had to make a custom cd w/
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 12:47:16AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:16:23 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > Please surprise me and don't comment on this one. Just leave it be.
> >
> > You shall be disapointed then, but then, you also chose to be
> > disapointing, chosing not
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:16:23 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> > Please surprise me and don't comment on this one. Just leave it be.
>
> You shall be disapointed then, but then, you also chose to be
> disapointing, chosing not to credit the work i did to solve the
> ide-generic bug, nor show any kind of
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:37:02PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:12:50 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:34:25PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 August 2006 21:06, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Supports is a big word, i believe, there where
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:38:29PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:15:05 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Notice that, as usual, Frans is being incoherent. He says this now,
> > but during months and months has been lecturing the kernel team on
> > what we should do or not, d
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:25:53PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> Here's a use case where having initramfs-tools unconditionally update
> initramfs images is a bad thing (at the very least, violating the
> principal of least surprise).
you use an plural, which is wrong.
initramfs-tools updates
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:15:05 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> Notice that, as usual, Frans is being incoherent. He says this now,
> but during months and months has been lecturing the kernel team on
> what we should do or not, dismissing the competence of the kernel
> team in a patronizing ways.
>
> He
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:12:50 +0200 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:34:25PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 August 2006 21:06, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Supports is a big word, i believe, there where random discussions
> > > about its need some year back or so, and the statu
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:40:07PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
>
> >Hi,
> >3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's
> >today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch:
> >
> >>start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing
> >>
>
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:34:25PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 20 August 2006 21:06, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Supports is a big word, i believe, there where random discussions about
> > its need some year back or so, and the status was not so good. So they
> > probably fixed it for x86 only o
Hi,
Here's a use case where having initramfs-tools unconditionally update
initramfs images is a bad thing (at the very least, violating the
principal of least surprise).
I had a machine that was had a poorly supported sata_mv chipset; dapper
nor sarge w/ 2.6.15/2.6.16 images would install onto it
Ok. I've installed the 2.6.17 kernel from debian unstable and everything (the
pendrive and the graphics card) works well:)
Thanks for help,
Tomek Kazmierczak
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> the next 2.6.17 upload, version 2.6.17-7 should become a candidate for
> testing.
> I would like to schedule the upload for Wednesday, Aug. 23.
> amd64 and i386 will go through NEW again, due to the added xen images.
> we have
Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
Hi,
3 days ago Frederik Schueler mentioned the following item for then's
today in his Kernel schedule proposal for Etch:
start migration of 2.6.17 kernel and udebs to testing
I asked him on #d-kernel precisely what was being done about this but
got no answer. I
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> #342246: [ia64 headers] arch/ia64/modules.lds: No such file or
> directory
This should be fixed by r7212
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Andras Horvath wrote:
> > but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems..
>
> Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend.
I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new kernel
currently...
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sunday 20 August 2006 21:06, Sven Luther wrote:
> Supports is a big word, i believe, there where random discussions about
> its need some year back or so, and the status was not so good. So they
> probably fixed it for x86 only or something, if they did it.
As Sven, as usual, does not have a cl
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:38:41PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> heya
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:04:37PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:24:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 2
>seriously learn to use the enter key. (broke aboves in several lines)
yeah... you are another person who tells me that... I will;)
>fetch linux-image 2.6.17 from unstable, should give you the best
>of both worlds :)
ok, I will try it.
Thanks, Tomek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
retitle 383908 mdrun hook needs to assemble root only - initrd-tools compat
stop
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:09:14PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.75
> Severity: important
>
> In case mdadm has not been upgraded from sarge yet, RAID assembly
> will fail as u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 383908 mdrun hook needs to assemble root only - initrd-tools compat
Bug#383908: needs to install mdrun/mdadm with hook
Changed Bug title.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:41:15PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:07:18PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > the package descriptions contains:
> > "This package contains the Linux/MIPS kernel image, the System.map file,
> > and the modules built by the package."
> >
> >
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.75
Severity: important
In case mdadm has not been upgraded from sarge yet, RAID assembly
will fail as update-initramfs does not install mdrun/mdadm anymore.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL
heya
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:04:37PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:24:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:40:33PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > for 2.4 sarge the
* Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-20 17:07]:
> the package descriptions contains:
> "This package contains the Linux/MIPS kernel image, the System.map file,
> and the modules built by the package."
>
> To be consistent with many other descriptions you need to substitute
> s/package/packa
hello,
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:07:18PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-r5k-cobalt
> Version: 2.4.27-11.040815-3
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> the package descriptions contains:
> "This package contains the Linux/MIPS kernel image, the System.map file,
>
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-r5k-cobalt
Version: 2.4.27-11.040815-3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
the package descriptions contains:
"This package contains the Linux/MIPS kernel image, the System.map file,
and the modules built by the package."
To be consistent with many other descriptions yo
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
kernel-build-2.4.27-2 | 2.4.27-12+b1 | sparc
kernel-headers-2.4-generic | 101sarge1 | alpha
kernel-headers-2.4-s390 | 2.4.27-1sarge1 | s390
kernel-headers-2.4-smp | 101sarge1 | alpha
kern
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:36:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:55:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:21:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > That's an interesting proposal. We could upload -rc4 or something now,
> > > under
> > > the 2.6.18~r
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Version: 2.6.15-8
Followup-For: Bug #370195
The bug has been fixed by adding the following packages:
1. linux-image-686
2. kernel-image-2.6-686
and upgrading to kernel 2.6.16.
Conclusion: are there dependecies to be added?
Patrick
-- System Information:
Debi
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:04:37PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:24:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:40:33PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > for 2.4 sarge there was a speakup flavour on x86_32
> > > anyone against adding such to 2.6?
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:55:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:21:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > That's an interesting proposal. We could upload -rc4 or something now, under
> > the 2.6.18~rc4 aby name or something, and start working on this one.
>
> The snapshot i
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:24:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:40:33PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > for 2.4 sarge there was a speakup flavour on x86_32
> > anyone against adding such to 2.6?
>
> Why only for x86 ?
is it tested somewhere else ?
--
maks
--
To
Hello,
the next 2.6.17 upload, version 2.6.17-7 should become a candidate for
testing.
I would like to schedule the upload for Wednesday, Aug. 23.
amd64 and i386 will go through NEW again, due to the added xen images.
we have 4 RC bugs left, of which 2 need immediate attention:
#342246: [ia6
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:21:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> That's an interesting proposal. We could upload -rc4 or something now, under
> the 2.6.18~rc4 aby name or something, and start working on this one.
The snapshot infrastructure is not able to use them yet.
Bastian
--
Time is fluid ..
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:07:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Best approach, actually, is to file a bugreport.
>
> But how do I file a bug report to the debian's bugtracking system
> about bug that is not explictly related to any debian's packade? I
> actually have sent a bug report to the "kern
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:40:33PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> for 2.4 sarge there was a speakup flavour on x86_32
> anyone against adding such to 2.6?
Why only for x86 ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 12:14:42PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 15.09: upload 2.6.18 to unstable [1]=20
> >
> > [1] The 2.6.18 release obviously depends on the upstream schedule, but 4
> > weeks from now is realistic considering the 2.6.18-rc4
for 2.4 sarge there was a speakup flavour on x86_32
anyone against adding such to 2.6?
i'll find a good moment to activate it for NEW,
so first step would be only addition.
a quite recent checkout of their lame cvs can be seen here:
http://dufo.tugraz.at/~prokop/grml-kernel/2.6.17-patches/4400_sp
Your message dated Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:48:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [: 211: /conf/conf.d: unexpected operator
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 15.09: upload 2.6.18 to unstable [1]=20
>
> [1] The 2.6.18 release obviously depends on the upstream schedule, but 4
> weeks from now is realistic considering the 2.6.18-rc4 status.
Is is really mandatory to include the final 2.6.18 and not use 1.6.18
>Best approach, actually, is to file a bugreport.
But how do I file a bug report to the debian's bugtracking system about bug
that is not explictly related to any debian's packade? I actually have sent a
bug report to the "kernel" metapackage (I had to write an email as there was no
"kernel" pa
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:12:06AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 06:55:26PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > retitle 376771 RM: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-* -- RoM
> > thanks
> >
> > in accordance with the d-i team any 2.4 kernel-image package
> > can be removed from
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:44:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 10:42:54PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 21:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Package: kernel
> > > Version:
> > Which version do you use? Own or from package?
>
> >T
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:45:09AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 04:12 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > And I have no idea about:
> > kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus
> > kernel-patch-2.4-fasttraks150
> > kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity
> > kernel-patch-2.4-lowlatency
> I'm t
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:44:39 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi. Sorry for replying so late, but I've just noticed that someone
> replied to my mail... (I should have subscribed to the list, now I
> have)
Best approach, actually, is to file a bugreport. That way issue does
not get lost, unless e
Hi Otavio,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:10:15PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> For this to happen, my transition plan is described bellow:
> - A new grub package would be uploaded to unstable having a group of
>wrappers that will call /usr/sbin utilities but warn the user to
>edit his/her
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 382802 initramfs-tools
Bug#382802: [: 211: /conf/conf.d: unexpected operator
Warning: Unknown package 'update-initramfs'
Bug reassigned from package `update-initramfs' to `in
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 04:12:06AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> And I have no idea about:
> kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus
This one can go too. Actually, i believe it is part of the
kernel-source-2.4.27-powerpc or whatever its name was source package, which
can go also.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
52 matches
Mail list logo
