This bug seems to have been resolved in a recent update of this package.
--
Chris O'Callaghan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 08/08/06 04:49:33PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, it reads to me that we won't screw our users without second
> > thought like some here are proposing.
>
> In my opinion, we have been screwing our users for years by lying to
> them abou
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, it reads to me that we won't screw our users without second
> thought like some here are proposing.
In my opinion, we have been screwing our users for years by lying to
them about whether their software was free. We would even say things
like "hard
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # Our priorities are our users and free software
>
> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software community.
> We will place their interests first in our priorities. We will support the
> needs of our users for operation in man
The problem seams to have disappeared; I did not understand why.
Between the moment when the problem was existing and now.
I have downloaded image and header of kernel 2.6.12 (using apt-get from
kernel 2.6.12).
Modify /etc/lilo.conf and runned lilo, to active kernel 2.6.16.
Patched and compiled
Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.16
Version: 2.6.16-17
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.16/apply/debian script doesn't check
KPKG_SUBARCH variable. When i compile xen3 kernel image i must manually
apply script with "-a i386 -s xen" flags instead of "make-kpkg --arch
i386 --subarch xen ..."
make-kp
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:33:46PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry if I am posting this into wrong NG (or list, if you prefer), please,
> kick me in the right direction. I am not a developer, but while tinkering
> with suspend2 patch with my home brewn kernel (currently 2.6.18-rc4), after
Hi,
sorry if I am posting this into wrong NG (or list, if you prefer), please,
kick me in the right direction. I am not a developer, but while tinkering
with suspend2 patch with my home brewn kernel (currently 2.6.18-rc4), after
studying HACKING document, I tried to include into initramfs a tiny s
hello,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:20:26AM -0700, Allyn, Mark A wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have a patch for the 2.6.17 kernel sources that I got from the
> unstable
> release; this patch is for the Intel e1000 network device driver.
> The source for this patch is on the upstream source for the e1000
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:02:54 +0200 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 14:18, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > It is no bug: The logic is to ask again when new possible better
> > options comes around, or if your choice disappears.
>
> But Petter's claim was that you would not be asked twice
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:35:43 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> reassign 382016 initrd-tools
> ah there is the requested info sorry for not having connected your
> mails. that is an initrd-tools failure no idea why the initrd.img
> for 2.6.15 was generated with initrd-tools.
>
> yes initrd-tools is
Hello:
I have a patch for the 2.6.17 kernel sources that I got from the
unstable
release; this patch is for the Intel e1000 network device driver.
The source for this patch is on the upstream source for the e1000 driver
at e1000.sourceforge.net.
This is a patch of about 15000 lines.
What is
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:58:44PM +0200, Jean-Michel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Frans Pop a écrit :
> >reassign 382013 initramfs-tools
> >tags 382013 + moreinfo
> >thanks
> >
> What additional information is usefull? cpio and initramfs-tools version
> number?:
can you please post the full error you
Your message dated Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:37:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382053: linux 2.6.16 snd-hda-intel doesn't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382016 initrd-tools
Bug#382016: installation: kernel 2.6.15 does not work, after upgrading some
packages.
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `initrd-tools'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
reassign 382016 initrd-tools
stop
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:09:29PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 12:59, Jean-Michel wrote:
> > This continue the bugreport sent few minutes ago.
>
> Please do *NOT* follow up to an existing bug report by filing a new one!
> I'm forwarding th
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 12:59, Jean-Michel wrote:
This continue the bugreport sent few minutes ago.
Please do *NOT* follow up to an existing bug report by filing a new one!
I'm forwarding this information to your original report and closing this
new one.
I ag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382043 linux-2.6
Bug#382043: Typo in latest kernel package (2.6.17.8)
Warning: Unknown package '382043'
Warning: Unknown package 'for'
Warning: Unknown package '2.6.17.8'
Warning: Unknown package 'i386'
Bug reassigned from package `(kernel-pack
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.16-17
Tags: patch
I have a Dell Precision M65 laptop with an Intel sound card:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition
Audio Controller (rev 01)
As reported on multiple sites on the Internet, e.g.,
http://ww
Hello,
Frans Pop a écrit :
reassign 382013 initramfs-tools
tags 382013 + moreinfo
thanks
What additional information is usefull? cpio and initramfs-tools version
number?:
dpkg -l | grep "ramfs\|cpio"
ii cpio 2.6-16 GNU cpio -- a program to manage archives of
ii cramfsprogs 1.1-6 Tools for
Did a brute-force grep to see what might be the issue here, came up with
this:
torgo:/lib/modules/2.6.16-2-k7# grep evbug modules.alias
alias input:b*v*p*e*-e*k*r*a*m*l*s*f*w* evbug
Commenting this line out solved my evbug problems. This seems like an
awfully heavy alias line.
signature.asc
D
package: (kernel-package for 2.6.17.8, i386)
version: 2.6.17.8
Bug: in debian/pkg/image/postinst there is a typo in line 1251
instead of
if ($explicit_do_loader || (! ($postinst_hook && -x '/sbin/grub')) {
you should have
if ($explicit_do_loader || (! ($postinst_hook && -x '/sbin/grub'))) {
.
> please post full not working dmesg.
Sorry about that, haven't done this before so had to check what is
available on busybox. Netcat saves the day from pen and paper.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Initializing CPU#0
PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 65536 bytes)
De
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 14:18, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> It is no bug: The logic is to ask again when new possible better
> options comes around, or if your choice disappears.
But Petter's claim was that you would not be asked twice during the same
installation. And my comments were only meant
tags 369517 +confirmed
thanks
* Andras Horvath wrote:
[...]
> but the -smp is still suffering from the same SCSI problems..
Confirmed, I'll investigate next weekend.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 369517 +confirmed
Bug#369517: linux-image-2.6.16-1-alpha-smp: undefined scsi symbols; fails to
allocate percpu data
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 12:59, Jean-Michel wrote:
> This continue the bugreport sent few minutes ago.
Please do *NOT* follow up to an existing bug report by filing a new one!
I'm forwarding this information to your original report and closing this
new one.
> After bootin on a 2.6.12 kernel, (t
reassign 382013 initramfs-tools
tags 382013 + moreinfo
thanks
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 12:36, Jean-Michel wrote:
> Yesterday evening, I'have done:
> apt-get install ttf-alee thunderbird-locale-fr bash apt binutils
> (I had seen they were available with apt-get -s update andapt-get -s
> upgrade).
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:04:38 +0200 Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 12:37, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > Perhaps there is something to learn from the dictionaries-common
> > package? I have not checked how they do it, but know the dictionary
> > packages only ask the user once to sel
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:54:11AM +0300, Tomi Pievilainen wrote:
>
> I have a BusLogic BT-946C scsi controller. lspci -v:
>
> :00:10.0 SCSI storage controller: BusLogic BT-946C (BA80C30)
> [MultiMaster 10] (rev 08)
>
> My system is installed on my scsi harddrives. Testing's and unstable's
>
> But you get a shell if you use initramfs-tools where you can check why
> it is not there.
no I don't -- not with the default initramfs (it's called initrd but the
kernel claims it's initramfs) nor with the one I built myself.
But! This one is fine:
ii linux-image-2.6.17-1-alpha-generic 2.6.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382013 initramfs-tools
Bug#382013: installation: ernel 2.6.15 does not work after installing ttf-alee
thunderbird-locale-fr bash apt and binutils
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `initramfs-tools'.
> tags 382013 + moreinfo
Bug#38
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 12:37, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Perhaps there is something to learn from the dictionaries-common
> package? I have not checked how they do it, but know the dictionary
> packages only ask the user once to select language, after all the
> language packages are installed
[Maximilian Attems]
> agreed,
> but that is an dpkg bug not having a "do this last and once" hook.
I know there is a long-term request for dpkg to get such support. But
I've seen no indication that such support is approaching soon, so I
believe it is best to solve this problem for update-initramf
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:37:02 +0200 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The existing packages will continue to work, while packages moving to
> this new approach need to add
>
> update-initramfs-intent packagename
>
> to their config script, and replace update-initramfs with
>
> update-initramfs-i
hello Petter,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:37:02AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> When installing debian-edu-artwork-usplash, the initrd is updated
> twice, once in the usplash postinst, and once in the
> debian-edu-artwork-usplash postinst. This seem like a waste of time
> to me. Could it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 381994 linux-2.6
Bug#381994: linux-image-2.6.16-17: SCSI storage controller: BusLogic BT-946C
doesn't work
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.16-17'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-17' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping proc
When installing debian-edu-artwork-usplash, the initrd is updated
twice, once in the usplash postinst, and once in the
debian-edu-artwork-usplash postinst. This seem like a waste of time
to me. Could it be possible to rewrite initramfs-tools to make sure
the initrd is only generated once, at the
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-17
Severity: normal
I have a BusLogic BT-946C scsi controller. lspci -v:
:00:10.0 SCSI storage controller: BusLogic BT-946C (BA80C30)
[MultiMaster 10] (rev 08)
My system is installed on my scsi harddrives. Testing's and unstable's
newest kernels fail to mount / wi
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:39:21AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 06:49:32AM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 04:46:09PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> > >
> > > > On Aug 08, Thomas
40 matches
Mail list logo
