Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script

2006-06-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:15:29PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Package: mkvmlinuz > Version: 22 > Severity: grave > Justification: make package in question unusable > > Hi, > > mkvmlinuz currently fails to work at all. There are a number of syntax > errors in the script, which would need to b

Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script

2006-06-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:38:42PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > severity 374185 important > tags 374185 moreinfo What type of info do you need? > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:15:29PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > mkvmlinuz currently fails to work at all. There are a number of syntax > > errors

Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script

2006-06-17 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 374185 important tags 374185 moreinfo On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 08:15:29PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > mkvmlinuz currently fails to work at all. There are a number of syntax > errors in the script, which would need to be fixed before it can ever > hope to run successfully. Did whoever u

Processed: Re: Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script

2006-06-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 374185 important Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script Severity set to `important' from `grave' > tags 374185 moreinfo Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006

Bug#374185: mkvmlinuz: syntax errors in script

2006-06-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: mkvmlinuz Version: 22 Severity: grave Justification: make package in question unusable Hi, mkvmlinuz currently fails to work at all. There are a number of syntax errors in the script, which would need to be fixed before it can ever hope to run successfully. Did whoever uploaded this actu

Re: Dropping the amd64-generic flavour

2006-06-17 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:42:26AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > -generic is odd and too long. I am considering to change the naming > scheme completely, and call the flavours 2.6.x-y-amd64 and > 2.6.x-y-em64t respectively. So if you use amd64 now, then what will you use when amd releases an a

Bug#374145: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686: lp in /etc/modules successful workaround

2006-06-17 Thread Arthur Marsh
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 Version: 2.6.16-14 Followup-For: Bug #374145 After adding the line: lp to /etc/modules, a reboot enabled /dev/lp0 to be just after printer detection: Jun 18 00:00:54 localhost kernel: parport: PnPBIOS parport detected. Jun 18 00:00:54 localhost kernel: parpor

Bug#374145: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686: parallel port detected but not reported until much later

2006-06-17 Thread Arthur Marsh
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 Version: 2.6.16-14 Severity: normal Recently I've run into the problem of the notification of the parallel port's existance not being passed onto udev until around half an hour after boot-up: Jun 17 22:24:05 localhost kernel: parport: PnPBIOS parport detected.