Re: sarge3 kernel build & r3

2006-06-08 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:43:54PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:12:24 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > > And since udev is needed for initramfs-tools, which is needed by the > > kernels, ... > > Initramfs-tools is not needed by the official Debian kernels - just > favored.

Re: sarge3 kernel build & r3

2006-06-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:12:24 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > And since udev is needed for initramfs-tools, which is needed by the > kernels, ... Initramfs-tools is not needed by the official Debian kernels - just favored. I run gnome on etch without udev installed. Sure, it means I cannot use the gnom

Re: sarge3 kernel build & r3

2006-06-08 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:33:51PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:08, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > > Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to > > > have a current backported kernel and all o

Re: sarge3 kernel build & r3

2006-06-08 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:33:54PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > That said, currently, backports are not an easy solution because of udev, > > which cannot be taken as is without pulling in the whole gnome, so a bit of > > work is needed. > > >

kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 REMOVED from testing

2006-06-08 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.4.27-11 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 20060604; done 20060606 Bug #362319: FTBFS: UTS R

kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus REMOVED from testing

2006-06-08 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the kernel-patch-2.4.27-apus source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.4.27-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 20060604; done 20060606 Bug #362319: FTBFS: UTS Relea

kernel-latest-2.4-alpha REMOVED from testing

2006-06-08 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the kernel-latest-2.4-alpha source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 101 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 20060604; done 20060606 Bug #367518: FTBFS in unstable: UTS

kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha REMOVED from testing

2006-06-08 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.4.27-11 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 20060604; done 20060606 Bug #367518: FTBFS in unsta

Re: sarge3 kernel build & r3

2006-06-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That said, currently, backports are not an easy solution because of udev, > which cannot be taken as is without pulling in the whole gnome, so a bit of > work is needed. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther What do you mean? You don't seriously mean udev depends

Re: sarge3 kernel build & r3

2006-06-08 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:08, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known to > > have a current backported kernel and all other packages needed with > > that kernel, but without random backp

Re: sarge3 kernel build & r3

2006-06-08 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:16:57PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 08 June 2006 13:33, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > - increasing differences between the Sarge 2.6.8 and current kernels; > > > > That is a reason for. > > Only if we _would_ include some backports repository that is known

Processed: Re: Bug#370651: kernel-package: README.modules: "User instructions" are incomplete and misleading

2006-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 370651 -1 Bug#370651: kernel-package: README.modules: "User instructions" are incomplete and misleading Bug 370651 cloned as bug 372161. > retitle 370651 kernel-headers are missing infrastructure needed to build > modules with kernel-package Bu

Re: Bug#370651: kernel-package: README.modules: "User instructions" are incomplete and misleading

2006-06-08 Thread Frank Küster
clone 370651 -1 retitle 370651 kernel-headers are missing infrastructure needed to build modules with kernel-package severity -1 wishlist reassign -1 kernel-package # keep the old bug title thanks Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, for starters, ./debian seems to be miss

Processed: squashfs_1:3.0-5(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing files

2006-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 371867 by 342246 Bug#371867: squashfs_1:3.0-5(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing files Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 342246 > severity 342246 serious Bug#342246: [ia64 headers] arch/ia64/modules.lds: No such file or directory Seve

Processed: linux bugs

2006-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 364671 linux-2.6 Bug#364671: Tried to install linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64-k8 into a pbuilder instance Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64-k8' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64-k8' to `linux-2.6'. > reassi

Processed: 2.6.16 ABI 1 bugs

2006-06-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 350510 linux-2.6 Bug#350510: loads ohci-hcd; breaks resume from software suspend Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.16-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-1-686' to `linux-2.6'. > reassign 358288 linux-2.6 Bug#358288:

Re: ABI handling for linux-2.6

2006-06-08 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:24:49AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Right, move them into provides and get make-kpkg / module assistant to >> pick that provides as dependecy for out of tree modules. > > That is a most interesting proposition. It does

Bug#372116: ehci_hcd don't work

2006-06-08 Thread dario
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7 Version: 2.6.16-14 Loading ehci-hcd (modprobe ehci-hcd) result in kernel saying "localhost kernel: ehci_hcd :00:10.3: Unlink after no-IRQ? Controller is probably using the wrong IRQ." Plugging any USB device result in error -110 and continuos readdressing of

Bug#372094: linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686-smp: uname problem

2006-06-08 Thread Yasuhiko Takasugi
Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686-smp Version: 2.6.16-14 Severity: important 'uname' command returns invalid verion. On 2.6.16-1-686-smp, uname -r returns '2.6.16-1-686-smp'. But on 2.6.16-2-686-smp, uname -r returns '2.6.16-2-686'. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable AP