even more relevantly, it would also be good to know:
o what defaults linux-source-* changed
thanks.
--
Webmaster: do you believe that people will (a) switch browsers to view
your "best viewed with" page or (b) go to your competitor?
Package: linux-source-2.6.16
Version: 2.6.16-13
Severity: normal
menuconfig provides defaults, and it also sometimes gives hints like
"if you're all like 'WTF?' then you can safely say Y here".
that's nice, but was that default there because of my old .config? or
is it a real default?
menuconf
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:16:37PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:46:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Kernel udeb creation process (possibly using k-p?)
> > > -
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:46:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
> > Kernel udeb creation process (possibly using k-p?)
> > -
> > If we build all of the *existing* udebs from a single source,
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:38:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:52:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Perhaps we disable new kernel features for etch 1/2? e.g., limit new
> > > feature to new hardware support. For example, we wouldn't want to
> > > turn on something
Title: Potential workaround
I did not receive all of the errors in the original report, but did receive some of them. This one (and related ones) were most prominent:
/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
An
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:52:53AM -0500, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha fails to build in unstable.
> Yes, I know. I have an update ready, but I didn't upload it yet
> because it's seems to be that we're removing 2.4 from etch.
Well, as the al
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:47:08AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:38:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:52:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > Perhaps we disable new kernel features for etch 1/2? e.g., limit new
> > > > feature to new har
linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.16-14_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.16-14_m68k.deb
(new) linux-headers-2.6-atari_2.6.16-14_m68k.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux kernel 2.6 on Atari machines
This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for th
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:10:54AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> [ keeping the cross-post and please keep it cross-posted ]
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
> > hey,
> > Frans Pop assembled an informal BoF at DebConf to discuss cross-team
> > issues related
[ keeping the cross-post and please keep it cross-posted ]
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
> hey,
> Frans Pop assembled an informal BoF at DebConf to discuss cross-team
> issues related to the kernel[1].
>
> We discussed the following topics:
> * Non-free modu
linux-2.6_2.6.16-14_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all_2.6.16-14_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all-m68k_2.6.16-14_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-2_2.6.16-14_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-2-amiga_2.6.16-14_m68k.deb
linux-headers-
12 matches
Mail list logo
