On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 03:31:06PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-16 17:04]:
> > > I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
> > > object to a filing of bugs to
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-16 17:04]:
> > I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
> > object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch?
>
> For mips/mipsel, there's at lea
Hello,
I would like to schedule 2.6.16-14 to be uploaded next monday.
2.6.16.17 will be released tomorrow (friday), which I would like to have
added in this release.
If you have pending changes, please commit them and do test-builds and
-boots for your architecture after .17 has been merged.
As
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:18:29AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone
> > object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch?
>
> Mips/mipsel d-i hasn't fully switched to 2.6 yet. Is there a urgent
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 271033 bug in drivers/md/md.c related to multipath
Bug#271033: mdadm - is not able to properly assemble multipath device
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 271033 kernel
Bug#271033: bug in drivers/md/md.c related to multipath
Bug reassigned from pac
Your upload was successful. These packages are now available:
- initramfs-tools
If you think you found a bug or just want to contact us please send
an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for using our service.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:37:39AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> i've not seen any bit of that tree yet and there is already a lot
> of new features to backport. until that "stable" tree appears talks
> are pretty much speculations.
Yes, agreed; let's see what happens with it first before maki
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:25:11PM +0200, David Bertho wrote:
> >please post the errorr message when you get dropped into busybox.
> >are you using grub or lilo?
the next time when you recountering such a problem, please
a) report a new bug if the old is already closed
and you are not 100% sur
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:37:24AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]
wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Brad Boyer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:11:32PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > What is supposed to happen after 'Trying to im_free...' ?
> > >
> > > Attaching the full
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:12:06AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Naturally, udev is a mess, even in the case of 2.6->2.6 upgrades, and we
> >don't
> >need to handle the case of self built kernels, as the user will probably know
> >how to handle the upgrade and o it by
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:11:32PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > What is supposed to happen after 'Trying to im_free...' ?
> >
> > Attaching the full log. The isa stuff is probably related to the graphic
card.
> >
>
> > Serial: 8250/16550 d
maximilian attems a écrit :
tags 359922 moreinfo
stop
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:41:36AM +0200, David Bertho wrote:
Hi
I just updated/upgraded my fresh etch and I got this bug from
initramfs-tools. If I upgrade I can't boot anymore.
I read on the mailing archive that it has been fixed,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 359922 moreinfo
Bug#359922: initramfs-tools: ata drive via usb 'scsi' /dev/sda stops boot, gets
busybox
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
tags 359922 moreinfo
stop
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:41:36AM +0200, David Bertho wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just updated/upgraded my fresh etch and I got this bug from
> initramfs-tools. If I upgrade I can't boot anymore.
>
> I read on the mailing archive that it has been fixed, but I still got the
> b
Hi
I just updated/upgraded my fresh etch and I got this bug from initramfs-tools.
If I upgrade I can't boot anymore.
I read on the mailing archive that it has been fixed, but I still got the bug.
I'm using Debian Etch Netinst Beta2 on a Via SP13000 motherboard with an IDE
HDD.
I hope someone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Naturally, udev is a mess, even in the case of 2.6->2.6 upgrades, and we don't
>need to handle the case of self built kernels, as the user will probably know
>how to handle the upgrade and o it by hand.
We actually do handle self built kernels, the same way we handle debi
16 matches
Mail list logo
