On Thu, 4 May 2006, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to upload 2.6.17-rc3 to experimental next monday,
this leaves 4 days for preparations.
I have no chance to update the alpha configs before leaving to
debconf6, and I'm not sure if alpha available there, so I
Hi!
I encountered a very similar problem with Ubuntu. The tested kernels
were 2.6.12 and 2.6.15. My setup was:
reiserfs/ext3
--
lvm
--
dmcrypt
--
md raid5
--
3 hds
--
The whols story can be seen here:
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showt
Your message dated Thu, 4 May 2006 22:11:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354598: Bug seems to be fixed in 2.6.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Thu, 4 May 2006 22:21:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346123: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: modprobe of kernel
module asus_acpi failed -- Solved with linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:04:23AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: mkvmlinuz
> Version: 20
> Severity: minor
>
> mkvmlinuz doesn't clean up its temporary working directory; the line at
> the end of the script that would normally do this is commented out. I
> appreciate that this might someti
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:52:49AM -0500, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:12:56PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:41:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:38:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey, c
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:12:56PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:41:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:38:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey, cool. so ARCH=ppc will work both for apus and prep, and the rest
> > > > s
Hi,
I compiled and run 2.6.16.13 vanilla kernel on Sarge and this problem
has too! snd_cs4281 was succesfuly detected at least in one case, but
I can't tell why.
My notebook is a little outdated Fujitsu-Siemens C-6155.
I tried to exclude ACPI support from kernel, but without affect on
snd_cs4281 no
I tried the usb again, and the crash came back but this
time reset-nvram won't clear it.
For now, I am going to assume there is just something flaky
about this box, since the other xserves behave themselves.
But I don't want to risk using the usb ports on the other xserves
since that appears to
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:12:56PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:41:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:38:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey, cool. so ARCH=ppc will work both for apus and prep, and the rest
> > > > s
Hey.
This is our fourth and last final attempt to reach
you regarding your low rate acception.
Here are the suggestions Our Office has for you
ASAP :
http://ilron.com/10r
lNTEREST-ONLY : $523K at 1.12%
FlXED : $632K at 1.61%
VARlABLE : $483K at 2.26%
Be quick, our proposals will end TONIGHT.
merge 365730 364637
thanks
On Thursday 04 May 2006 13:52, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] wrote:
> Subsequent attempt to boot 5/3/06 daily image made it to the 'Trying to
> im_free...' hang from bug Bug#365844.
That should be #364637 (as #365844 was closed because it was a duplicate).
As it no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 365730 364637
Bug#364637: [powerpc64] boot hangs at 'Trying to im_free nonexistent area
(d800820d7000)
Bug#365730: [powerpc] [d-i] Oops when booting from usb flash drive
Merged 364637 365730.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-12_powerpc.deb: package says priority is
extra, override says optional.
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-12_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra,
o
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-12_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-12_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-12_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-12_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.16-12_powe
linux-2.6_2.6.16-12_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.16-12.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.16-12.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-12_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.16_2.6.16-12_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.16_2.6.16-12_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.16_2.6.1
Problem appears to be nvram corruption. Reset nvram from Open Firmware
reset-nvram
set-defaults
reset-all
(same procedure commonly used to 'repair' failing firewire and usb ports).
Subsequent attempt to boot 5/3/06 daily image made it to the 'Trying to
im_free...' hang from bug Bug#36584
Bug is still present as of the daily image from 5/3/06 (closed bug 365844)
---
Toni Harbaugh-Blackford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator
Advanced Biomedical Computing Center (ABCC)
National Cancer Institute
Con
This bug is still present in the daily image from 5/3/06 (closed bug 865859)
The crash occurs even when there is no usb device present. The console log
of an attempt to install the image to the same Xserve G5 box from an external
firewire drive ended in the following:
.
.
.
requesti
From: Jonas Smedegaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The severity tagging relates to the distribution as a whole,
> not to the individual user of a package.
> Please read the clarifications of the severities here:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Sorry, but I do not understand the
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:41:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:38:07PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Hey, cool. so ARCH=ppc will work both for apus and prep, and the rest
> > > should
> > > go with ARCH=powerpc. This is the case both for 2.6.16 and the
On Wed, 03 May 2006 23:03:33 +0200 Martin Hansen wrote:
> Package: kernel
> Severity: critical
The severity tagging relates to the distribution as a whole, not to the
individual user of a package.
You are not the first one to misinterpret this :-)
Please read the clarifications of the severitie
On Wed, 03 May 2006 23:31:29 +0200 Christian Pernegger wrote:
> This machine currently hangs instead of rebooting when I do a
> shutdown -r or similar. It will go down ok, but after the screen goes
> dark it does not beep and show the POST agian like it should - it
> just hangs there.
Perhaps you
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to upload 2.6.17-rc3 to experimental next monday,
> this leaves 4 days for preparations.
I have no chance to update the alpha configs before leaving to
debconf6, and I'm not sure if alpha available there, so I don't
know if I'm able to update the configs.
Hello,
2.6.17-rc3 is iavailable in trunk since a couple of days, and does
successfully autobuild on the snapshot buildds - logs are to be found
here: http://stats.buildserver.net/build.php?arch=&pkg=linux-2.6
The orig tarball is to be found here:
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-ker
Package: mkvmlinuz
Version: 20
Severity: minor
mkvmlinuz doesn't clean up its temporary working directory; the line at
the end of the script that would normally do this is commented out. I
appreciate that this might sometimes be useful for debugging, but could
this please be controlled by an optio
26 matches
Mail list logo
