Hi Blars,
According to Fabio Massimo Di Nitto, who is the Ubuntu sparc kernel
maintainer, quite a lot of fixes went into the sparc64 SMP code recently,
so the recent upstream snapshot is worth to try. I have built a 2.6.17-rc2
kernel from today's snapshot of Linus' git tree. It boots fine on m
I tried just removing the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 setting from
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd, and also from
/usr/share/initrd-tools/scripts/e2fsprogs, which also sets it, and
that seems to work ok on both 2.4 and 2.6 (generating initrd for 2.4
kernel).
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:00:08PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >2.6.16.10 is scheduled for tomorrow. More than one upload per day is not
> >good for the buildd network.
>
> I would say that more than one upload per *week* is too much for the
>
retitle 364338 LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is broken
tag 364338 d-i
severity 364338 serious
confirmed 364338
reassign 364338 initrd-tools
thanks
Here's a sh -x trace of mkinitrd running on a 2.4 kernel and failing:
++ LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4
++ ldd /sbin/modprobe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 364338 LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is broken
Bug#364338: kernel-image-2.4.27-3-k7: Failed to create initrd image.
Changed Bug title.
> tag 364338 d-i
Bug#364338: LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> severity 364338 serious
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
2.6.16.10 is scheduled for tomorrow. More than one upload per day is not
good for the buildd network.
I would say that more than one upload per *week* is too much for the
buildds, especially now, when stable releases often consist of a single
few-lin
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were
> > uploaded.
>
> There was.
Where?
> > 2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just
> > wanted to fix it.
>
> 2.6.16.10
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:53:36PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Don't upload 2.6.16-10 without any notice.
> I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded.
There was.
> 2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just wanted
> t
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 23:50:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364353: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: Fails to mount root file
system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> Don't upload 2.6.16-10 without any notice.
I can't remember notices before 2.6.16-8 and 2.6.16-9 were uploaded.
2.6.16-8 broke alpha builds, because 2.6.16.6 is buggy. I just wanted
to fix it.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-7bpo1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
It says "Waiting for root file system" and then it stalls.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-k7
Locale: LANG=en_DK, LC_CTYPE=e
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-3-k7
Version: 2.4.27-10sarge2
Severity: normal
Unpacking kernel-image-2.4.27-3-k7 (from
.../kernel-image-2.4.27-3-k7_2.4.27-10sarge2_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.4-k7.
Unpacking kernel-image-2.4-k7 (from
.../kernel-image-2.4-k7
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 364277 linux-2.6
Bug#364277: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: snd_via82xx unresolve symbol
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060422 11:17]:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:04:53PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > waldi why not add your patch to update-grub to the next stable release?
>
> Please keep in mind that you can't rely on a current sarge installati
Hi nobse
Don't upload 2.6.16-10 without any notice.
Bastian
--
... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get
to know each other.
-- Kirk, "Elaan of Troyius", stardate 4372.5
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:04:53PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > waldi why not add your patch to update-grub to the next stable release?
>
> Please keep in mind that you can't rely on a current sarge installation
> when it is upgraded to etc
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.60
Something I find extremely annoying at the moment is that initramfs-tools
is silent when it generates an initrd during upgrade of, for example,
udev.
What I get on e.g. my sparc is:
Setting up udev (0.090-1) ...
Installing new version of config file
linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-amiga_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-bvme6000_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6-hp_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux
linux-2.6_2.6.16-9_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.16-1-all_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1-all-m68k_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-1-amiga_2.6.16-9_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.1
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 05:04:53PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > waldi why not add your patch to update-grub to the next stable release?
Please keep in mind that you can't rely on a current sarge installation
when it is upgraded to etch, in other words, you can't depen
20 matches
Mail list logo
