More from debian-sparc:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> I don't have any trouble with sparc64 architecture, only with 2.6 and=20
>> sparc32 :-( Maybe this bug come from the same location than the bug I=20
>> have submitted in bugzilla.kernel.org (#6344)... DMA mis
More from debian-sparc:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>--=-=-=
>
> i have here 3 machines but never crashes. they are the whole day under
> very heavy load.
>its a t1125 e420r e220r every machine full equipped ram/processor/hd
>but no crashes in the last 12month (only po
Additional information from debian-sparc:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Blars Blarson a écrit :
>> I've submitted bug 361214 about the frequent sparc SMP crashes with 2.6
>> kernels.
>>
>> Is anyone running a sparc 2.6 SMP kernel and NOT having the system
>> crash unde
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 22:44:41 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:58:07PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
> > On Friday 07 April 2006 20:30, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:51:12PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
> > >
> > > if grub is around lilo isn't run.
>
Hi,
I've attached a fourth version of the ROOT-setting patch.
The only changes compared to the previous patch is that more
documentation is added, both as inline comments and to the relevant man
page.
I'm hoping that I can get some more feedback on whether this approach is
ok, or which alte
On Friday 07 April 2006 21:44, maximilian attems wrote:
> kernel-package wants to drop ability to run lilo on the postinstall.
> grub is the _default_.
>
> update-initramfs can easily check for an lilo.conf and warn in those cases.
A warning (preferably in the form of a prompt which must be acknow
severity 361270 critical
thanks
Hello,
please address this issue soon, it is breaking installations on upgrade.
Raising the severity to critical.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 361270 critical
Bug#361270: update-initrams doesn't call lilo, when grub is around
Severity set to `critical'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 361199 normal
Bug#361199: sparc64 tftpboot kernel driver failure during Gigaswift ethernet
(aka cassini) detection (#2)
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:58:07PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
> On Friday 07 April 2006 20:30, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:51:12PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
> >
> > if grub is around lilo isn't run.
> > if you really want lilo remove grub from your system and
> > update
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-486
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
2.6.15 kernel just fails to install (similarly to 2.6.16 from unstable):
==
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot$ LANG=C sudo aptitude install l
On Friday 07 April 2006 20:30, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:51:12PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
>
> if grub is around lilo isn't run.
> if you really want lilo remove grub from your system and
> update-initramfs will call lilo.
>
> ...
>
> i'll document the fact that if you
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 21:30:36 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:51:12PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
> > On Friday 07 April 2006 16:41, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > update-initramfs runs lilo, have you also grub around,
> >
> > I don't use grub, but as you will see below,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:51:12PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
> On Friday 07 April 2006 16:41, maximilian attems wrote:
> > update-initramfs runs lilo, have you also grub around,
>
> I don't use grub, but as you will see below, it is installed. (I have had to
> use it in the past for system recov
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> retitle 361270 update-initrams doesn't call lilo, when grub is around
Bug#361270: Upgrade of initramfs-tools made kernel unbootable with lilo
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, sto
On Friday 07 April 2006 16:41, maximilian attems wrote:
> update-initramfs runs lilo, have you also grub around,
I don't use grub, but as you will see below, it is installed. (I have had to
use it in the past for system recovery when my commercial boot manager
corrupted the MBR.)
> please post
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:24:11PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:33:28AM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >
> > >can you try acpi_cpufreq with 2.6.16?
> > >I don't remember where I read p4_clockmod refuses to load on some c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 361270 important
Bug#361270: Upgrade of initramfs-tools made kernel unbootable with lilo
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 361270 moreinfo
Bug#361270: Upgrade of initramfs-tools made kernel unbootable with lilo
There were no tags set.
Tags a
severity 361270 important
tags 361270 moreinfo
stop
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 04:43:26PM +0100, David Jarvie wrote:
>
> Upgrading initramfs-tools yesterday caused the current kernel 2.6.15-1
> to become unbootable, apparently because the upgrade process regenerated
> initrd.img-2.6.15-1-k7. The upg
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59b
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Upgrading initramfs-tools yesterday caused the current kernel 2.6.15-1
to become unbootable, apparently because the upgrade process regenerated
initrd.img-2.6.15-1-k7. The upgrade process should have
Matthias Klose a écrit :
Steve Langasek writes:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
would like to know what does this exactly mean:
- That users are advised not to use them?
- That we could dr
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - configure gcc with --disable-tls (on which architectures would that
> be (not) needed?)
amd64, maybe hppa. Anything with supports tla in sarge and don't ship
with 2.4 kernels.
> - build a libstdc++6 with a gcc, configured with
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
> > would like to know what does this exactly mean:
> > - That users are advised not to use them?
> > - That we could drop support
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone from the kernel team is intrested in getting
the 64bit kernels build again for i386. It should only be a matter of
adding the amd64 config files to i386 and build them with "--arch amd64
--cross-compile '-'". The kernel source takes care of adding -m64
where needed auto
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-sparc64-smp
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: important
This error repeatadly happens, and is the main reason sparc is no
longer considered a release architecture, but I could not find a bug
filed for it.
Running with a serial consoled logged to another system, I was able
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-5
Severity: important
when booting linux-image-2.6.16-1-686, version 2.6.16-5, the alsa driver
snd-cs4281 fails to probe the sound chip:
PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device :00:0b.0
...
never read ISV3 and ISV4 from AC'97
CS4281: probe of :00:0b.0
Package: kernel
Severity: critical
It is not possible to bring Gigaswift (aka Cassini) ethernet cards
online and therefore continue installation on SunFire V440
(UltraSparc IIIi) when I use boot.img placed in the following
directory of debian archives:
/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-spa
27 matches
Mail list logo
