On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
- sparc headers packages lacks sparc64 headers, who is responsible for
sparc?
That should be fixed by the commit 6370. I'm running the test build now.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
can you try acpi_cpufreq with 2.6.16?
I don't remember where I read p4_clockmod refuses to load on some chips
in favour of acpi_cpufreq.
It didn't work:
alien:~# uname -a
Linux alien 2.6.16-1-686 #1 Mon Apr 3 12:53:40 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
alien:~#
Your message dated Tue, 04 Apr 2006 22:37:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel: NIC: Unknow symbol mii_*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: kernel
Version: N/A; reported 2006-04-04
Severity: important
Unable to recognize SATA drives on NVIDIA-2 chip sets if SCSI emulation
is turned on. Recompiling the kernel without SCSI support recognizes the
drives as /dev/hd?. The same drives are recognized and mapped to SCSI
drives under
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:49:45PM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
> Version: 2.6.16-5
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi. After upgrading to a 2.6.16 kernel the module p4-clockmod doesn't
> work anymore:
>
> # modprobe p4-clockmod
> FATAL: Error inserting p4_clockmod
Hey Bastian,
> To implement this solution, we need help from both the backport and the kernel
> team: we need autobuilders and we need someone for every arch to verify and
> approve the packages for the archive.
as I was on the kernel-archive team since the first minute, sure you can
count me in
#include
* Jurij Smakov [Tue, Apr 04 2006, 09:34:29AM]:
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:37:43PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> >
> >There is already one available on
> >svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-voip/zaptel-modules/trunk/debian.
> >or
> >http://svn.debian.o
* Bastian Blank wrote:
> The backports.org archive carries current versions of most needed
> packages to run new kernels on Sarge but some of them (eg
> initramfs-tools) are outdated,
That's because backports.org is based on testing, not unstable.
It's the same reason why 2.6.16 isn't available o
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:37:43PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
There is already one available on
svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-voip/zaptel-modules/trunk/debian.
or
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-voip/zaptel-modules/trunk/debian/
Great! I'll have a look, than
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-5
Severity: normal
Hi. After upgrading to a 2.6.16 kernel the module p4-clockmod doesn't
work anymore:
# modprobe p4-clockmod
FATAL: Error inserting p4_clockmod
(/lib/modules/2.6.16-1-686/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.ko):
No su
tags 360758 confirmed
thanks
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 03:48:38PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> After upgrading linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-k7 from 2.6.16-4 to 2.6.16-5
> I had to rebuild the third party modules.
I checked the changes and found a change in a core structure of the
vserver suppor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 360758 confirmed
Bug#360758: linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-k7: module binary incompatibility
between 2.6.16-4 and 2.6.16-5 ?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Hi folks
As requested and discussed several times since the release of Sarge, we are
planning to provide a complete solution for the issue of outdated kernels in
Sarge.
The backports.org archive carries current versions of most needed packages to
run new kernels on Sarge but some of them (eg init
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-686
Version: 2.6.16-5
Severity: minor
As the subject says: the package description of
linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-686 is exactly the same as the package
description of linux-image-2.6.16-1-686, giving no indication of what's
different in the vserver packag
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-k7
Version: 2.6.16-5
Severity: normal
After upgrading linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-k7 from 2.6.16-4 to 2.6.16-5
I had to rebuild the third party modules.
Errors reported when inserting the old modules were:
kernel: nvidia: disagrees about version of symbo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358580 normal
Bug#358580: linux-2.6: cannot build modules against 2.6.16
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 358580 linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686
Bug#358580: linux-2.6: cannot build modules against 2.6.16
Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6'
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:28:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
I just detected, that the modules support lacks some things.
> I intend to do the following changes:
- The modules source packages needs to build depend on linux-support-*
as they sometimes uses makefiles from there.
- The modules g
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:22:12PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> AFAICT, the linux-support package does not contain any arch-dependent
> files. Is there a good reason why it is 'Architecture: any', and not
> 'all'?
Read the commit logs. It is fixed in trunk and won't be backported to
sid.
Bastia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 358580 2.6.16-5
Bug#358580: linux-2.6: cannot build modules against 2.6.16
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.16-5, send any further explanations to
Richard Antony Burton <[
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:37:43PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the discussion I've seen so far most people tend to favor the system,
> in which each individual module package builds the binary packages
> matching the current kernels. Based on that I've written a very
> preliminary d
Your message dated Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:27:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fixed in 2.6.16-1-686
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
21 matches
Mail list logo
