Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 359926 - patch
Bug#359926: initramfs-tools: diskless / nfsroot boot fails at nfsmount ... ,
works with mount -t nfs ...
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, s
Your message dated Sun, 2 Apr 2006 01:01:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close bug for real
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 358917 pending patch
Bug#358917: initramfs-tools: should look for "rootflags=" in kernel command line
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, patch
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 358649 pending
Bug#358649: initramfs-tools: Allow passing nfs root mount options on kernel
cmdline
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing he
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 359922 moreinfo
Bug#359922: initramfs-tools: ata drive via usb 'scsi' /dev/sda stops boot, gets
busybox
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> reassign 358607 udev
Bug#358607: /dev/input missing when used with older udev
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `udev'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 09:46:05AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Ok, I'm pretty lost here. If there are no headers now in
> linux-headers-$version (despite the name), where will the working headers
> now come from? Please describe it in detail, so that at least I can
> document it in kernel-handb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> tags 359922 - patch moreinfo
Bug#359922: initramfs-tools: ata drive via usb 'scsi' /dev/sda stops boot, gets
busybox
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch, moreinfo
>
End of message,
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 09:44:15AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> My question is why are you
> cross-compiling at all (and which arch).
i386, s390 and m68k.
> cross-compiling at all (and which arch). Of course, it is nice to be able
> to help slow arc
Hi!
I stumbled across the same problem, but consider the problem way more grave
than just "wishlist". I am using an XFS root with quotas enabled, but XFS
doesn't support a remount to enable quotas and thus the /-remount with
usrquota,grpquota fails. This leaves / mounted read-only which breaks
tags 359641 moreinfo
stop
[ please don't remove the bug report from your reply list,
such private mails can easily be lost. ]
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, studiolazzarini wrote:
> no idea how to reopen
> stop
the bug is already reopen as you can easily see at:
http://bugs.debian.org/359641
please ad
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
No. linux-headers-$version-$abiname-all-$arch are empty[tm] packages
which depends on any headers packages for the given architecture.
linux-headers-$version don't contain any header, it is only a container
for a verbatim copy of debian/{arch,lib,modules}
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
The whole linux-kbuild stuff only provides any gain if it is build
seperately. This way this package is built natively for the target
architecture.
Bastian
I still don't see a clear reason why this is required. I see that if you
are cross-compiling, t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 359919 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359919: kernel-2.6.16-4-ppc: alsa does not work
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Package: kernel
Severity: normal
After upgrading from 2.6.15 to 2.6.16 (both Debian stock kernels -k7-smp), X's
mga drm failed to initialize (using xserver-xorg 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5). This
was due to the 'OldDmaInit' workaround necessary for 2.6.15. Once I
disabled that, drm was initialized. However, w
Perhaps looking at existing kernel modules packaged for Debian?
>>>
>>>Maybe a good idea, but since the module did build before (using the
>>>upstream makefile), I thought it would be better to get the module to
>>>compile first, before trying to package it.
>>
>>
>>Still, recent off
I was wrong. I was trying to compile the fglrx-kernel-src from the ati web site,
not the one from the debian repository. The Makefile are different. I guess the
one from ati is not up to date.
I still get the "seems to contain unconfigured kernel source" warning.
Regards,
Jerome
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.16-4
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Up to the latest 2.6.15 kernel I've always had good temperature control
for my laptop with the fan starting up and slowing down as needed.
Now the fan will not start up anymore until the processor is already
overheated. The
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've got the etch-kernel 2.6.16-1-686.
I tried to activate the centrino-wlan with the hardware key and the
kernel crashed.
with the message "fatal exception in interrupt"
The computer freezes so if you need the complete errorlog , you have
to tell me
20 matches
Mail list logo
