In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have received a number of bug reports (353400, 358913, 359207) against
> kernel packages about the check for the Cumana partition table, commonly
> found on Acorn machines. Being too lax, this check occasionally
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:12:04PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> [..]
> > 2) do not build module .udebs from out-of-tree packages, and let it be the
> > responsability of the d-i team to extract choice modules from those
> > out-of-tree modules .debs to b
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
[..]
2) do not build module .udebs from out-of-tree packages, and let it be the
responsability of the d-i team to extract choice modules from those
out-of-tree modules .debs to be repackaged as .debs. I don't know if the d-i
team is ready to go that wa
[ Please follow-up to debian-kernel. ]
Hi,
We have received a number of bug reports (353400, 358913, 359207) against
kernel packages about the check for the Cumana partition table, commonly
found on Acorn machines. Being too lax, this check occasionally produces
false positives for VFAT parti
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:00:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#353111: 2.6.15 kernel can't find root disk /dev/sda1,
won't boot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-4
Severity: important
The 2.6.16-1-686 headers package does not allow the build of a simple
third-party module, in this case "tp_smapi".
The failure mode is particularly mystifying: it is an apparently
"successful" accomplishment of nothing at a
Hi,
I've been following the debian-kernel email since the release of the
2.6.16 kernel, as well as searched the unofficial archives, for the
cause of the basic problem, and have found no solutions.
My platform is a Dell PowerEdge 2500, dual CPU, 0.5 GB RAM, 5 SCSI hard
disks on the integrate
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kern
linux-2.6_2.6.16-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-headers-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
linux-image-2.6.16-1-486_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6.16-1-486_2.6.16-4_i386.deb
linux-image-486_2.6.16-4_i386.de
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb
kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.16-4_powerpc.d
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb: package says priority is
extra, override says optional.
kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.16-4_powerpc.deb: package says priority is extra,
ove
linux-2.6_2.6.16-4_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.16-4.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.16-4.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.16_2.6.16-4_al
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 358913 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4054
Bug#358913: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: USB flash stick created on Macintosh
doesn't work
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.59b.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59b.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.59b.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59b.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.59b_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.59b_all.deb
Announcing to debia
initramfs-tools_0.59b_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.59b.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.59b.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.59b_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 359207 linux-2.6
Bug#359207: Cant use some USB keys because of CONFIG_ACORN_PARTITION_CUMANA
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-1-686' to `linux-2.6'.
> reassign 358913 linux-2.6
Bug#358913: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: USB flash sti
I am confirming that. Boog is probably connected with initramfs-tool,
when you uninstall initramfs-tool and install yaird instead instalation
of kernel goes fine.
eloy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej
reassign 359207 linux-2.6
reassign 358913 linux-2.6
severity 358913 normal
forwarded 359207 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4054
thanks
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Christophe Chisogne wrote:
Another user submitted the same bug (358913) [1] as me (359207) [2]
I wasn't sure about the severi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 302523
Bug#302523: kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8: module dm_mod locks my IDE disks
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processi
Hi,
this bug is gone in kernels 2.6.15 and 2.6.16, therefore I'm going to
close it.
--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:56:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359725: initramfs-tools: set -eu causes broken shell when
not using bash?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59
Followup-For: Bug #359355
Hi!
I fixed this by adding empty initializers for supportet_{host,target}_version
into /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs-kpkg just before the getopt call.
Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
reassign 359720 yaird
thanks
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:09:45 -0400
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
> yaird error: Could not read output for /sbin/modprobe -v -n
> --show-depends --set-version 2.6.16-1-powerpc ide-generic (fatal)
> mkinitrd.y
reassign 359720 yaird
stop
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 12:09:45PM -0400, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc
> Version: 2.6.16-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
yaird bug, i thought that got fixed??
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Has
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: normal
Errors after an update to linux-image-2.6.16-1-686:
##
apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59
Severity: important
when upgrading kernels, I get the following error:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-686-smp (2.6.16-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
Other valid candidates: mkinitramfs-kp
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359355: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359666: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359681: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359613: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359355: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359620: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359620: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359620: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359613: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359355: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While trying to install linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-powerpc (2.6.16-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding vali
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:17:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359613: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.59b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-amd64-generic
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I had installed linux-image-2.6.16-amd64-generic and today
aptitude has detected a newer version of the package.
Unfortunately it has not been able to install it:
portatildebian
reassign 359355 initramfs-tools
reassign 359620 initramfs-tools
reassign 359613 initramfs-tools
reassign 359666 initramfs-tools
reassign 359681 initramfs-tools
stop no thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 359613 grave
Bug#359613: Fail to create initramfs image during kernel upgrade
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 359355 359613 359620
Bug#359355: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: postinst fails with "mkinitramfs-kpkg:
line 55: supported_host_version:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 359355 initramfs-tools
Bug#359355: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: postinst fails with "mkinitramfs-kpkg:
line 55: supported_host_version: unbound variable"
Bug reassigned from package `initramfs-tools' to `initramfs-tools'.
> reassign 359620 initr
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:43:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:23:47AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > This is not an initramfs-tools problem, but the result of powerpc daily
> > d-i builds, for which Sven himself is responsible, failing for the last
> > few days.
>
> I di
I don't see anything else that could be responsible for that on such an early
stage. Even if something else were responsible, I don't know where to search.
By the way, the same problem existed with the previous 2.6.8-2-686 kernel
package. The message certainly appeared after some update, but I
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: important
Upgrade fails. Details follow:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 359667 linux-2.6
Bug#359667: kernel-image-2.6.12: bttv.ko module causing a system hang
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.12'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.12' to `linux-2.6'.
> severity 359667 important
Bug#359667: ker
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-3
Upgrading linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 to version 2.6.16-3 stops on ramdisk
creation.
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-686 (2.6.16-3) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitramfs-kpkg to build the ramdisk.
/usr/sbin/mkinitram
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:52:55AM +0200, Ralf Rösch wrote:
> Dear Maximilian,
>
> this morning I would like to upgrade to 2.6.16 kernel, but your script
> currently fails and the installation can not be continued.
> Is there anything missing on my system?
as quick workaround comment "set -eu" o
Another user submitted the same bug (358913) [1] as me (359207) [2]
I wasn't sure about the severity level : he used "normal" and I used
"important". Perhaps it should be "normal" for both?
I think the two bug reports should be merged (with same severity).
As I dont know how I could do this, cou
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686
Version: 2.6.16-3
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [E
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 359355 grave
Bug#359355: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: postinst fails with "mkinitramfs-kpkg:
line 55: supported_host_version: unbound variable"
Severity set to `grave'.
> reassign 359355 initramfs-tools
Bug#359355: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686: post
Hi all,
what linux-2.6 kernel to install on dell dimension 9150 with sata ?
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 4
model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz
stepping: 4
cpu MHz : 2793.392
cache siz
Thanks for the feedback.
First of all, note that I've split this bug into two with the changes to the
regular initramfs-tools scripts (the only change being the sourcing of files
generated by subscripts) going into this bug and the new hook and
local-premount script going into a bug against crypts
53 matches
Mail list logo
