Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is pretty obvious (to me, at least) that the need for the official
> packaging policy for the out-of-tree kernel modules is long overdue. As
> mentioned on the wiki page dedicated to it [0], the current situation is
> a mess. I would like to call for a formal discu
Jurij Smakov wrote:
> * Automatic rebuilds (configurable) on kernel updates. Nothing fancy, just
> a transparent way to figure out whether the currently installed
> kernel module source is compatible with the new kernel, and attempt
> rebuild and installation, if neccessary.
The thing I really
tags 358537 + fixed
thanks
* Jerry Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-22 23:16]:
> >BTW, can you please try if initramfs-tools works? (it should)
>
> I found that yaird 0.0.12-8 fixes the problem. Do you still want me to try
> the initramfs-tools as well?
If yaird work for you that's fine.
--
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Jerry Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-22 22:05]:
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
yaird error: bad value in /boot/config-2.6.16-1-k7:
CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xB000 (fatal)
mkinitrd.yaird failed to create init
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 358537 yaird
Bug#358537: linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7: Install fails on yaird error
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7' to `yaird'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
It looks like the quick fix is to require yaird >= 0.0.12-8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 358537 yaird
thanks
* Jerry Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-22 22:05]:
> Running depmod.
> Finding valid ramdisk creators.
> Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
> yaird error: bad value in /boot/config-2.6.16-1-k7:
> CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xB000 (fatal)
> mkinitrd.yaird failed
Hi,
It is pretty obvious (to me, at least) that the need for the official
packaging policy for the out-of-tree kernel modules is long overdue. As
mentioned on the wiki page dedicated to it [0], the current situation is a
mess. I would like to call for a formal discussion, which will eventually
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.57b
Followup-For: Bug #350510
I upgraded to the 2.6.16-1-686 that just landed in unstable, and I'd
like to report that this bug still exists under 2.6.16 at least for
uhci_hcd and ehci_hcd.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers u
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7
Version: 2.6.16-2
Severity: important
Installing this package failed as follows:
Setting up perl-doc (5.8.8-3) ...
Setting up rcconf (1.18) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include
* Mau [Thu, Mar 23 2006, 01:01:22AM]:
Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.16-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
probably a bug in this package - module-assistant says 'Warning,
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.
Your message dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:34:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351623: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7: seems to be fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 358510 initramfs-tools 358510
Bug#358510: linux-image: SCSI/SATA boot problem
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image' to `initramfs-tools'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: linux-image
Version: 2.6.?? i386 and amd64
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have 2 systems with SCSI system disks and SATA misc disks (P4 and
AMD64). At install, I put / on the SCSI and the grub MBR on (hd0)
(set to the SCSI in the BIOS).
The installer wrote /b
* Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-20 21:10]:
> >Anthony, do you still see this bug with 2.6.15 or (better yet) 2.6.16?
> >(will be uploaded tomorrow).
> >
> 2.6.15, yes. I'll check 2.6.16 when it hits unstable (I'm guessing,
> though I still need to test, that the ide-tape cleanu
#include
* Mau [Thu, Mar 23 2006, 01:01:22AM]:
> Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp
> Version: 2.6.16-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> probably a bug in this package - module-assistant says 'Warning,
> /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.16-1 seems to contain uncon
#include
* anarcat [Wed, Mar 22 2006, 01:11:37PM]:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp
> Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
> Severity: wishlist
There is no point in reporting wishlist bugs against Stable kernels,
they are not going to be fixed because Sarge is stable.
> The builtin sk98lin drive
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.53c
Followup-For: Bug #358153
By the time /scripts/local-top/md runs, there are no scsi devices created (at
least in
my machine with Adaptech cards).
The problem is related to udev, lasting many seconds to create /dev/sd*.
I solved the problem with a script
Package: linux-headers-2.6.16-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.16-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
probably a bug in this package - module-assistant says 'Warning,
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.16-1 seems to contain unconfigured kernel source!'
Thanks - Mau
-- System Information:
De
As per ubuntu bug 17388 linked to, this issue still exists for this
card in RAID5 mode, which uses the megaraid_mbox driver.
Using the Debian Etch nightly Installer from March 15, 2006, I was
able to install Etch on a Raid 5 volume, but the initramfs attempted
to load the root fs before the
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.16-1
Severity: wishlist
Not sure if there is a way to fix this or if its just "yeah, hardware
sucks" but 2.6.16 makes snd_had_intel's position_fix=1 param quite
needed. [Actually there was a little static, every once and a while, in
previous kerne
Hadmut Danisch wrote:
So before mounting /root the initram needs to scan for RAID,
setup encryption, scan the LVM device and then mount / .
The first two are already there with the patch, i.e. regular scanning
is first done (RAID, LVM, EVMS, etc) and encryption is then setup.
Currently, the
Hi,
I've attached a third version of the patch. The changes to the init
script have been removed and I intend to add the script/hooks files to
the cryptsetup package instead (separate wishlist bug to be filed soon).
Thus, the patch is reduced to a four-line change to scripts/functions, I
hop
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 334331
Bug#334331: LSI/Megaraid RAID controller
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> As per ubuntu bug 17388 linked to, this issue still exists for this
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> card in RAID5 mode, which uses the
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.16-1_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.16-1_s390.deb
kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.16-1_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.16-1_s390.deb
linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.16-1_s390.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linu
Accepted:
kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.16-2_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.16-2_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.16-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kern
linux-2.6_2.6.16-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.16-2.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.16-2.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.16_2.6.16-2_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.16_2.6.16-2_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.16_2.6.16-2_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.16_2.6.16-2_all.d
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge1
Severity: wishlist
The builtin sk98lin driver in that kernel cannot detect properly that
gigabit card.
sk98lin: No adapter found.
Using the manufacturer driver works, however, and the card is properly
detected:
http://www.marve
severity 358360 important
thanks
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 02:27:55PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> you seem to be running a mixture of testing and sid,
> that is _not_ supported.
The dependencies say something else.
Bastian
--
Beam me up, Scotty!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 0.0.12-4
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> notfound 2.6.16-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reassign 358365 yaird 0.0.12-3
Bug#358365: installation: creating initrd with yaird fails
Bug reassigned from
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-8
Followup-For: Bug #351623
Hello all,
I've got no reiserfs problems with version 2.6.15-8. From the changelog,
it looks like this is the relevant patch:
* Add stable Release 2.6.15.5:
- reiserfs: disable automatic enabling of reiserfs inode
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:00:43 +0100
Bas van Schaik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, I'm trying to package enbd (Enhanced Network Block Device)
> for Debian. This also includes building a module against the kernel
> headers for the client-side of the block device. Building the module
> on the
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:27:55 +0100
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> severity 358360 normal
Please clarify your reasoning when changing severity of bugreports.
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:09:35PM +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > ii udev 0.084-1/dev/ an
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.57b
Severity: grave
Hi,
The package fails to install (failure to check if the image is
modifiable), is the first part. Failure to install makes is
unuseable.
,
| Errors were encountered while processing:
| initramfs-tools
| E: Sub-process /usr/
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-k7
Version: 2.6.16-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
After installing linux-image-2.6.16-1-vserver-k7 my http server
working in a vserver stopped to serving static content (dynamic is
served ok). strace shows the static content is served with sendfile64
which suggest th
Hi all,
Currently, I'm trying to package enbd (Enhanced Network Block Device)
for Debian. This also includes building a module against the kernel
headers for the client-side of the block device. Building the module on
the current sarge kernels succeeds without any problems, however, on the
current
Hi guys! I don't know if you are working on the ata_piix bug that
prevents me from using the IDE CDROM with the ATA HD... but it's making me
going crazy! :)
I've following the recommendations of making a new initrd file with the
modules ide-generic ata_piix sd_mod and ordered in this way. Now, dur
* Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-22 14:36]:
> should we upload 2.6.16-2 today, to get ia64 and hppa into the archive?
And mips/mipsel, which had a failure in -1 I couldn't predict.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358354 important
Bug#358354: 0.56 incompatible with busybox 1.01-4?
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 358354 moreinfo
Bug#358354: 0.56 incompatible with busybox 1.01-4?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop as works for lots o
severity 358354 important
tags 358354 moreinfo
stop as works for lots others
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 12:20:01PM +0100, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> After upgrading from initramfs-tools 0.55b to 0.56 my 2.6.15-1-686-smp system
> would no longer boot, and drop me into a busybox shell. Among the boot
>
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.53
Severity: minor
| See /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs(8) for further details.
This is not very helpful... makes cut&paste hard. Can you please
simply say "mkinitramfs(8)".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 02:11:15PM +0100, David Förster wrote:
>
> Installation fails with the following output:
>
> Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7 (2.6.16-1) ...
> Running depmod.
> Finding valid ramdisk creators.
> Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
> yaird error: bad value in /boot
tags 358360 morinfo unreproducible
severity 358360 normal
stop
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 01:09:35PM +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
>
> The description of this bug is the same as for #344754. The only
> difference is the version of package. The solution presented in
> #344754 works in my case as well. T
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 358360 morinfo unreproducible
Unknown tag/s: morinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-u
Hello,
should we upload 2.6.16-2 today, to get ia64 and hppa into the archive?
Only m68k would be left then, and could be scheduled as 2.6.16-3 upload
when it's done.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7
Version: 2.6.16-1
Severity: important
Installation fails with the following output:
Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7 (2.6.16-1) ...
Running depmod.
Finding valid ramdisk creators.
Using mkinitrd.yaird to build the ramdisk.
yaird error: bad value in /boot/config
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.57b
Severity: important
The description of this bug is the same as for #344754. The only
difference is the version of package. The solution presented in
#344754 works in my case as well. The problem appears with standard
Debian kernel 2.6.15-1-686-smp. I haven't
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.56
Severity: grave
After upgrading from initramfs-tools 0.55b to 0.56 my 2.6.15-1-686-smp system
would no longer boot, and drop me into a busybox shell. Among the boot messages
busybox had printed a help message for mknod (at a glance identical to the
output of
> Linux kernel version 2.6.16 broke cpufreq support for me. I can no
> longer load the module acpi-cpufreq, which means that software such as
> cpufreqd doesn't work.
I had the same problem on a MSI s260 (Medion version). Loading the
modules speedstep-centrino instead of acpi-cpufreq solved it for
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 12:08:03PM +1100, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Security focus list a remote buffer overflow vulnerability.
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17178
This is wrong. The buffer overflow is limited to local users with
CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
The relevant commit in the upstream repository is
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
> * maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 14:37]:
>
> > > The raid1 kernel module appears to be in the initrd image, but is not
> > > loaded. Loading it manually does not create /dev/md{012}. Grub has set
> > > root=/dev/md0.
> >
> > can yo
Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Security focus list a remote buffer overflow vulnerability.
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17178
>
> I can't find a CVE for it yet, so I cant see if you've got it under
> control on your subversion patch tracking page.
It's the first time I've heard of that. Solar Desig
52 matches
Mail list logo
